07-01-2010, 09:01 AM
| || |
Points: 26,095, Level: 70
| || |
Join Date: Mar 2007
| | Re: Quackwatch Being Sued by Doctor's Data
I for one, had a heavy metals "panel" done a few years back at the MD's. It was only ordered because I figured out that the lead in the paint I was griding away at was a lot higher than I expected, and I wanted to be sure I did not get any. I think it included 5-7 metals, AND THERE WASN'T ANY URINE INVOLVED. It was done on a blood draw. I haven't given a urine sample since I was about 3 years old.
So, I guess now you are thinking, well that must be what is wrong with him, and thus proof of the necessity of urine testing
Seriously, I would further like to add, that all lead lawsuits from a brief exposure MUST be bullshit. I had two lines of green paint running up my nose for about 2 weeks straight, and with plenty to report on the "post cleanout shnarf-up" every day in the shower....
Yet no lead contamination....
Disclaimer: My thoughts are fictional ramblings only. The pupose of my participation here is to stimulate fuel for thought. EVERYONE should take everything here will a large grain of salt. Use this information for your own furthe reseach ONLY.
The Wopper Popper