• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Steroid Profiles
  • Steroid Articles
    • Contributors
  • Steroid Forum
MESO-Rx

MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

  • Anabolic Steroids
    • Anadrol
    • Anavar
    • Deca Durabolin
    • Dianabol
    • Equipoise
    • Masteron
    • Oral Turinabol
    • Primobolan Depot
    • Sustanon 250
    • Testosterone
    • Trenbolone Acetate
    • Winstrol Depot
  • hGH & Peptides
    • CJC-1295
    • GHRP-6
    • hGH
    • hCG
    • IGF-1
    • Melanotan II
    • MGF
    • Mod GRF 1-29
    • TB-500
  • Anti-Estrogens
    • Arimidex
    • Aromasin
    • Clomid
    • Letrozole
    • Nolvadex
  • Fat Loss
    • AICAR
    • Albuterol
    • Clenbuterol
    • DNP
    • Ephedrine
    • T3
    • Telmisartan
You are here: Home / Steroid Articles / Anabolicus Maximus? Bodybuilder Disagreements About Insulin

Anabolicus Maximus? Bodybuilder Disagreements About Insulin

February 7, 2022 by Mair Underwood 115 Comments

insulin

Disclaimer: These are bodybuilder opinions about insulin, some of which are wrong. Please do not take these opinions as advice. Stay tuned for the paper where we evaluate bodybuilder knowledge and present the facts about insulin.

One of the most misunderstood and debated drugs in bodybuilding is insulin. This is because we have no science to act as a foundation for the ways that bodybuilders use insulin. This makes all bodybuilder knowledge about insulin use broscience. By using this term ‘broscience’ I am not meaning to discredit this knowledge. Experiential knowledge is very important, and often the athletes are ahead of the science, and can even be right when the science is wrong (Holt 2009). But sometimes what bodybuilders spout about insulin is complete bullshit. So how do you know who to listen to?

Bodybuilder practice of insulin is based on heaps of n=1 studies, and a bunch of gurus who spout science-y sounding explanations. Few of these guys have any scientific or medical training, let alone expertise in endocrinology. Some of them have no fucking clue what they are talking about, but act like they do. There may be some gems of knowledge in this body of knowledge but most people (including myself) have no idea how to separate the gems from the shit.

What I am hoping to do is to change that. As a social scientist I am not qualified to judge bodybuilder knowledge myself. Many bodybuilders have a much better grasp of how insulin works and how it should be used than I do. Instead what I bring to the table is years of research in bodybuilding communities and a whole heap of different bodybuilder perspectives on insulin for bodybuilding collected from 20 interviews with insulin users with experience of insulin ranging from months to decades, over 30 hours of bodybuilder YouTube videos on insulin, and forum and social media posts on insulin use for bodybuilding. I also have an endocrinologist colleague who is going to help me make sense of this data. And not just any endocrinologist, but one who is happy to admit when athletes are right and science is wrong (indeed I cited him above). It is time to turn the insulin broscience into science, and correct some potentially dangerous myths.

So, in this paper I want to present some of the disagreements about insulin that I am hoping to resolve with the help of my colleague, Richard Holt. I am writing this paper not only to demonstrate the diverse, and even contradictory, views that bodybuilders hold about insulin, but also hopefully to inspire you to add your two cents. How do you use insulin and why? Which of the views presented here do you agree with and which don’t you agree with? The fuller the picture of bodybuilder knowledge I get, the better able we will be to evaluate this knowledge.

As an anthropologist I am trained not to judge, and to not view one kind of knowledge as superior to another. Bodybuilders know stuff that medicos could never know because they have a different focus and different priorities. Therefore, I usually just collect and present this knowledge and leave it for others to judge. But whilst I was collecting this insulin data I had a few bodybuilders ask me: ‘so, who is correct?’. By that they mean, ‘whose views most align with the available scientific evidence?’. Since the age of enlightenment in bodybuilding (which I have discussed in a previous paper on here) bodybuilders want to practice bodybuilding in a way that is scientifically informed. This is why this time I plan to go beyond just reporting bodybuilder knowledge and practice, and have enlisted someone who can perform a scientific evaluation of this bodybuilder knowledge.

I won’t say which bodybuilders I interviewed, whose videos I reviewed, and whose words I collected from forums, as I have an ethical agreement with my university to not reveal the identities of people who participate in my research so as to avoid any risk of harm to them. Therefore, all names are pseudonyms. Suffice is to say that I interviewed some individuals who are recognised as world experts in the use of insulin for bodybuilding. I also included your average Joe bodybuilders. This is what I found.

How anabolic is insulin?

Bodybuilders disagree about how anabolic insulin is. A minority state that exogenous insulin is not directly anabolic. Some suggest insulin only induces anabolism by increasing appetite.

A very small minority of bodybuilders suggest that the impact of exogenous insulin is mainly, or purely, cosmetic, in that insulin primarily makes the muscle look ‘fuller’ (rather than actually increasing the muscle size) by increasing water retention.

In contrast many bodybuilders claim that insulin is the strongest anabolic hormone.

Some participants described insulin use as resulting in muscular increases of 3-6 kg per week over and above what could be attained through anabolic androgenic steroid (AAS) use alone, or AAS and growth hormone (GH) use combined. However, these claims were disputed by other participants. Two participants felt the benefits of insulin were not sufficient, and they did not plan to use insulin again. One of these no longer recommends insulin use to his clients.

While some bodybuilders suggest that insulin use alone is anabolic, others suggest that insulin is only significantly anabolic in synergy with AAS and hGH (described as the ‘anabolic triumvirate’ in a video).

How does insulin work as an anabolic agent?

Most bodybuilders agree about how insulin works but have more or less science in their explanations.

Bodybuilders typically describe insulin as “shuttling” or “driving” nutrients into muscle cells. Insulin is described as a “key” that unlocks the cells, or a “bus” that delivers nutrients. Some bodybuilders cite scientific literature when describing the action of insulin:

It seems that insulin has at least a permissive effect on protein synthesis, such that its basal levels are needed for normal myofibrillar protein synthesis (MPS), but elevating insulin after a meal may not increase MPS (Greenhaff et al., 2008). However, insulin promotes muscle anabolism (protive protein balance) via its inhibitory effect on muscle protein breakdown (MPB) (Deutz and Wolf 2013). Still, insulin may increase MPS via greater (essential) amino acid presentation to skeletal muscle that is brought on by increased vasodilatation-associated blood flow (Biolo et al., 1995; Fujita et al., 2006; Timmerman et al., 2010). [Chad via email].

Most agree that:

  1. insulin is very effective at shuttling nutrients into muscle cells, but it also shuttles nutrients into fat cells.
  2. insulin is anabolic because of its role in nutrition partitioning as it works in concert with GH and IGF-I.
  3. insulin promotes muscle anabolism via its inhibitory effect on muscle protein breakdown.
  4. insulin (as well as AAS and GH) promotes muscle protein synthesis only in the presence of an adequate supply of amino acids.
  5. insulin plays a role in the physiological control of reproduction by effects on Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)/ luteinising hormone (LH) secretion.

Insulin is also described by some bodybuilders as anti-catabolic.

One high-profile bodybuilder stated that insulin should only be used if an individual is insulin deficient:

Sometimes it’s a good idea to take insulin just to help the pancreas do its job. … if your body was producing enough of its own, why would you need to take any exogenous insulin? It does – in other words, it’s not going to do anything beneficial. It’s only going to help if you’re not producing enough insulin. So you have to first establish if you’re not producing enough insulin. Get a glucometer, check your blood sugars. … So insulin should only be used if you have a deficiency of insulin, because you’re using a lot of GH or because you’re eating an exorbitant amount of carbs [Alan].

One bodybuilder also stated that insulin’s anabolic effects are due to its osmotic actions, and another to its ability to open “all of the receptors in your body”.

How dangerous is insulin?

While some bodybuilders warn others off insulin because it can put you in a coma or kill you, most feel that the risks of insulin have been overstated, and some suggest that death from insulin use is extremely unlikely. Many have sentiments along the lines of “you’d have to be a dickhead to kill yourself with insulin”.

While the deaths of several high-profile bodybuilders during the course of my research were initially suggested by members of the bodybuilding community to be insulin related, insulin was not implicated in the official causes of their deaths. I have not come across a confirmed case of death, or significant harm, as a result of insulin use for bodybuilding, although some bodybuilders have stated that they know someone who has died as a result of insulin use (and one did have a serious car accident as a result of going hypo on a motorway but luckily no one was injured). There are two instances of bodybuilders going into hypoglycaemic comas reported in the medical literature (Heidet et al., 2019; Petrovic et al., 2015). Whether the lack of confirmed deaths is because insulin is not dangerous, or because it is not commonly tested for, or difficult to detect, I do not know.

One bodybuilder suggested that premature deaths resulting from insulin use may not be only due to hypoglycaemia, but suggested that increased levels of insulin over the lifetime shortens lifespan, and thus bodybuilders were putting themselves at risk in that regard.

Some bodybuilders suggest that insulin is one of the safest drugs in their arsenal particularly as compared to DNP and trenbolone (I have described the harms of tren as described by bodybuilders previously). Some even suggest that insulin is safer than any AAS.

While all bodybuilders described at least mild symptoms of hypoglycaemia at some points in their insulin use, most hypoglycaemic episodes were during the early stages of use when they were working out their insulin dosing, or were attributed to their stupidity (e.g. forgetting to eat). All bodybuilders stated that hypoglycaemia was easily managed by consuming sugars.

How necessary is insulin for professional bodybuilding?

Many suggest that to be competitive as a pro bodybuilder you must use insulin. However, others suggest it is not necessary.

Insulin is a part of bodybuilding now, it’s a part of it. It’s like whitened teeth. Everybody whitens their teeth, everybody has these gleaming white teeth. If you have one guy that doesn’t have them, yo go “what’s wrong with you?” … if you’re not doing insulin, which some pros do not, some people don’t need it, then that look is a little bit different from other bodybuilders and you could stand out in a bad way .

Did insulin ruin bodybuilding?

Many attribute the significant increase in muscularity of the mass monsters to insulin and/or growth hormone. Some suggest that therefore insulin ruined bodybuilding as the focus shifted from aesthetics to size at the expense of aesthetics. Others have additional critiques of the insulin look:

Before insulin come in, go back to the early days of Bertil Fox, Tom Platts, Arnold, Sergio, their muscle had this hard granite look, looked like it was carved out of stone. Now you get these guys, sure they are big and freaky like the Ramy’s and all these guys, they’re big but they don’t have that dense hard look .

But then others suggest that Dorian Yates was the first to bring an insulin-enhanced physique to the Olympia stage and he is often described as having a granite-like look.

Some suggest that insulin (and/or growth hormone) causes ‘bubble gut’ or ‘Palumboism’, and one source stated that insulin caused organomegaly. For these reasons some state that insulin has ruined the bodybuilding aesthetic.

How much insulin?

There’s a wide range of insulin dosing being practiced among bodybuilders. I have spoken to bodybuilders who use a maximum of 4iu per day, and others who have used a max of 360iu per day! However, inline with past academic research which reported dosing of between 10-20iu per day (Dawson and Harrison 1997; Evans 1997; Hildebrandt et al., 2007), and surveys conducted within the community, I found that most bodybuilders use doses at the lower end of the spectrum. But my sample tended to use more than has previously been reported in the academic literature and in the community, with a median daily dose of 40 units, and a median dose of 0.39 units per kilogram of bodyweight.

What type of insulin?

Most bodybuilders only use one form of insulin (fast or rapid-acting), although a quarter of those interviewed (n=20) also used a long-acting insulin.

How much carbs with insulin?

We all know that the most frequently mentioned ratio of barbs to insulin is 10 grams of carbohydrate to 1 unit of insulin. But not all bodybuilders adhere to this ratio. Several participants had no set ratio of carbohydrate to insulin, whilst the remainder used a range of ratios (5-20 grams per unit of insulin) with a mean and median of 9 grams of carbohydrates to every unit of insulin.

When is the best time to take insulin?

Most bodybuilders took insulin with meals, but considering that bodybuilders are always eating that doesn’t tell us much. There was a great deal of debate about the most effective time to use insulin with some suggesting that pre-workout is the most effective time, and others stating that this was irresponsible use as it is difficult to determine how much carbohydrate will be burnt during the workout, and thus pre-workout insulin use could be dangerous. Some bodybuilders use insulin pre- and post-workout, and others only post-workout.

Does insulin use cause diabetes or protect against it?

Some bodybuilders suggest that recreational insulin use puts bodybuilders at risk of developing diabetes. Other bodybuilders suggest that their use of insulin reduces the risk of diabetes as it lessens the impact of bodybuilding diets.

What do you think?

Do you agree with the above or disagree? Is there anything you would like to add? Join the conversation in the forum to add your voice so as to ensure that we get the most effective evaluation of bodybuilder knowledge. That way we finally have an academic resource we can use to counter the bullshit that is spread about insulin. Watch this space for a future paper which evaluates this knowledge from a scientific perspective and puts some of the myths to rest.

Disclaimer: These are bodybuilder opinions about insulin, some of which are wrong. Please do not take these opinions as advice. Stay tuned for the paper where we evaluate bodybuilder knowledge and present the facts about insulin.

References cited

Biolo G, Declan Fleming RY and Wolfe RR. (1995) Physiologic hyperinsulinemia stimulates protein synthesis and enhances transport of selected amino acids in human skeletal muscle. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 95: 811-819.

Dawson RT and Harrison MW. (1997) Use of insulin as an anabolic agent. British Journal of Sports Medicine 31: 259.

Deutz NE and Wolfe RR. (2013) Is there a maximal anabolic response to protein intake with a meal? Clinical Nutrition 32: 309-313.

Evans NA. (1997) Gym and tonic: a profile of 100 male steroid users. British Journal of Sports Medicine 31: 54.

Fujita S, Rasmussen BB, Cadenas JG, et al. (2006) Effect of insulin on human skeletal muscle protein synthesis is modulated by insulin-induced changes in muscle blood flow and amino acid availability. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism 291: E745-E754.

Greenhaff PL, Karagounis LG, Peirce N, et al. (2008) Disassociation between the effects of amino acids and insulin on signaling, ubiquitin ligases, and protein turnover in human muscle. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism 295: E595-E604.

Heidet M, Abdel Wahab A, Ebadi V, et al. (2019) Severe Hypoglycemia Due to Cryptic Insulin Use in a Bodybuilder. Journal of Emergency Medicine 56: 279-281.

Hildebrandt T, Langenbucher JW, Carr SJ, et al. (2007) Modeling Population Heterogeneity in Appearance- and Performance-Enhancing Drug (APED) Use: Applications of Mixture Modeling in 400 Regular APED Users. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 116: 717-733.

Holt RIG. (2009) Is human growth hormone an ergogenic aid? Drug Testing and Analysis 1: 412-418.

Petrovic I, Petrovic S, Vujanac K, et al. (2015) Clinical Presentation Of The Abuse Of Insulin: Hypoglycaemic Coma And Aspiration Pneumonia In Non-Professional Bodybuilders. Serbian Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research 16: 347-351.

Timmerman KL, Lee JL, Fujita S, et al. (2010) Pharmacological Vasodilation Improves Insulin-Stimulated Muscle Protein Anabolism but Not Glucose Utilization in Older Adults. Diabetes 59: 2764-2771.

insulin

About the author

Mair Underwood
Mair Underwood
Senior Lecturer at University of Queensland

Mair Underwood is an anthropologist who explores body cultures. She has been living in online bodybuilding communities for the last 6 years (she has even been inspired to start lifting). Through forums and social media she has learnt about bodybuilding culture. She has been particularly focussed on enhancement drug use, and she works to increase understanding of, and support for, people who use enhancement drugs.

Filed Under: Steroid Articles

115 replies

Join the discussion →

Loading new replies...

Avatar of Habib Habib Feb 07, 2022 #1

Well, my mom's never gonna let me touch this stuff. Too dangerous and I'm not at that level yet.

But I still eat Clen and Tren hard

Reply 2 likes

Avatar of JuicyJ JuicyJ Feb 07, 2022 #2

It took me over a decade of using PEDs to decide to try insulin. After doing my own research I decided it was beneficial as I regularly take HGH and wanted to counter some of the effects of gH. After a few months of experimenting with my glucose monitor and regular insulin injections I found my sweet spot which is roughly 1-2 IU for every 2 UI of gH.

By micro dosing my insulin with my gH, I feel like Im getting more out of the protein and carbohydrates in my diet. Low dosing hasn't affected my insulin sensitivity much at all. Most notably, my pumps have been next level compared to any other bodybuilding hack for maximizing pump. For responsible users, insulin is very safe and in the five years I've used it I have never had any concerning incidents

Reply 3 likes

click to expand...
I Isrrike Feb 07, 2022 #3

Wouldn’t touch it without pharma hgh in system. Tried it with generics it’s not the same. Even 5iu and 5g/iu spills over if quality growth isn’t in the mix. Crazy pump tho

Reply 1 like

Avatar of Type-IIx Type-IIx Feb 08, 2022 #4

Please view this as fair criticism! But God, this is very thin on citations for an article that purports to be quasi-scientific. I have more cites (by several-fold) from my own informal note-taking on Insulin. Where were Holt's contributions, if any, besides the statement that bodybuilders are often ahead of the science?

No mention of the cardiac harms from Insulin use. These are very real and the most likely contributor to early deaths in bodybuilding.

Did you ever read this thread: Who SHOULDN'T take slin?

It just seems to me this article, on the one hand, gave away too much detail with respect to dosages, and at the same time, was very thin on detail with respect to harms.

Reply 2 likes

click to expand...
Avatar of MairUnderwood(Researcher) MairUnderwood(Researcher) Feb 08, 2022 #5

Yes I have heard that insulin pumps are insane! I didn't put much about the experience of insulin in this paper but when I publish the full paper in an academic journal I will be sure to.
I am really interested in this matching of your slin dose to your gH dose - is this commonly done? also, what would be your maximum gH dose and therefore slin dose?

Reply Like

Avatar of MairUnderwood(Researcher) MairUnderwood(Researcher) Feb 08, 2022 #6

Thanks for the feedback but I think you missed the point of the article which wasn't to summarise the existing science, but to summarise bodybuilder perspectives, and particularly the issues of debate, and to inspire people to add their two cents so I have good data to analyse before I publish the full paper later. Rest assured that the full paper will contain the science - that's what Richard Holt will contribute. I contribute the 'broscience' for him to evaluate. Thanks for the link. I have found Dave Palumbo spouts a lot of misinformation about insulin

Reply 1 like

click to expand...
Avatar of MairUnderwood(Researcher) MairUnderwood(Researcher) Feb 08, 2022 #7

I would love to hear more about how you use the science and your take on insulin for my research. This is the type of data I am currently gathering for the future paper

Reply 1 like

h hometeam Feb 08, 2022 #8

There's a reason for the debate and issues. It has to do with how much they're eating and how advanced they are. There's a point where you're taking a whole lot of anabolics but just won't grow until you're eating more. Then there's a point where you're stuffing your stomach with as much food as physically possible and the only way to grow more is by using insulin as a nutrient multiplier.

People who have gotten to that point will have a whole different view on it than people who haven't. And ya know, how many people really want to be Ronnie Coleman?

But what about insulin sensitivity? Has that been addressed?

Reply 2 likes

click to expand...
s steckdose0 Feb 08, 2022 #9

gave me a type of fullness i've never got before, but i would have to compare it to nandrolone fullness. although i never pinned insulin pre workout (only in the morning and post workout), i still had sick pumps from that morning pin.

i remember once after a 2 month break from lifting, the first two weeks i pinned 10iu humalog 3x a day and i blew the fuck up within 10 days it was crazy. after every shot i chugged 60-75g dextrose. 15 min later i'd down a 4 scoop protein shake. hour and a half later 3 cans of tuna or 3 cups egg whites with some potatoes. that's it. gotta keep it super super strict on humalog. not sure how it goes with other super long insulins.

now i'm not sure if i'd do that again. i felt like a ginny pig in a science experiment. i got great results but when i do insulin i start feeling like maybe i've taken my hobby a bit too far...

Reply 1 like

click to expand...
Avatar of Habib Habib Feb 08, 2022 #10

I heard it's always good to take 2ius of insulin with an HGH shot to peak IGF-1 levels. And taking HGH, 15 minutes, then insulin post workout is the best noobie protocol.

Reply Like

Avatar of Megadick3000 Megadick3000 Feb 08, 2022 #11

Insulin (humalog) was the first PED i ever used in working out.

I had two friends growing up who were diabetic and i watched them use insulin many times even in their early teens so maybe that desensitized me to being afraid of insulin (if those half baked idiots could safely use it im sure i could).

The pursuit of using it never occured to me despite at the time me using simple carbs to spike my endogenous insulin pre/post workout. One day i learned that in Canada where i lived insulin could be bought right from the pharmacy without a prescription, and it was cheap. The same day i learned that i went and bought some humalog. I already knew i should ingest 10g of carbs per 1iu used. I was about 17 years old at the time and began using insulin, primarily post workout but experimented with various protocols.

Ive since used it on and off various times, with my heaviest and most consistent use being between ages 30-33 when i was pairing it with rHGH. I have not touched insulin for little over 4 years now.

I have never gone hypo from using insulin but i have always ingested 10g carbs per iu, with my primary carb used being dextrose powder id buy from a beer&wine brewing shop for like $10/5kg bags. I also always, even as a teenager, kept a big box of NERDS candies near me within a few hour window after administration incase i did start going hypo. Not only do i love NERDS candies but their primary ingredient is dextrose, and given they are easily portable they were my safety item when id be out and about. Id always keep a box in the center console of my car.

Insulin can pack weight on you fast. In conjunction with rHGH its even faster. Is it muscle? Well given how fast it packs on thats unlikely and its primarily glycogen build up and water. Being an ectomorphic body type i never really gained fat from insulin ever even using it solely by itself. It can help you break through plateaus both in weight and strength. You will get better pumps and better recovery when using it correctly.

I would never consider using insulin on a cut or in a caloric deficit or on a ketogenic diet. This is for bulking on a carb heavy caloric surplus only. I always maintained a minimum intake of 10g carbs per iu, i never tried reducing my carb to iu ratio, but ive read of guys getting away with considerably less carbs per iu, but i dont see why you would want to use insulin with minimal carbs as it would rob you of the results and increase your risk for hypo.

I should also add, during the peak of my use i was using humalog 14 days on/off with Metformin during the 14 day off period. When i used insulin as a teen i was not using metformin but never used the slin for more than a few weeks at a time.

I just had blood work yesterday as a matter of fact, and my fasting blood sugar was 5.0 mmol/L with a lab reference range of 4.1-5.9 mmol/L considered normal.

Reply 4 likes

click to expand...
Avatar of Type-IIx Type-IIx Feb 08, 2022 #12

OK, I acknowledge that your article is intended to summarize the (often erroneous) beliefs about insulin among bodybuilders, but please recognize that you've written an article that is rich in persuasive writing techniques - I would presume unintentionally, i.e., without forethought (as a summary of even anthropological data is in my experience usually presented in a more science writing or technical writing style). I was expecting, a couple of paragraphs in, that this article (that you refer to more than once as a "paper") was the product of discourse or input from the expert authority you refer to, Richard Hold.

Just a sample of some of the persuasive writing techniques (bolded text is not my emphasis):

Pathos: "One of the most misunderstood and debated drugs in bodybuilding is insulin. This is because we have no science to act as a foundation for the ways that bodybuilders use insulin. This makes all bodybuilder knowledge about insulin use broscience. By using this term ‘broscience’ I am not meaning to discredit this knowledge. Experiential knowledge is very important, and often the athletes are ahead of the science, and can even be right when the science is wrong (Holt 2009). But sometimes what bodybuilders spout about insulin is complete bullshit. So how do you know who to listen to?

"Bodybuilder practice of insulin is based on heaps of n=1 studies, and a bunch of gurus who spout science-y sounding explanations. Few of these guys have any scientific or medical training, let alone expertise in endocrinology. Some of them have no fucking clue what they are talking about, but act like they do. There may be some gems of knowledge in this body of knowledge but most people (including myself) have no idea how to separate the gems from the shit."

Ethos: "Instead what I bring to the table is years of research in bodybuilding communities and a whole heap of different bodybuilder perspectives on insulin for bodybuilding collected from 20 interviews with insulin users with experience of insulin ranging from months to decades, over 30 hours of bodybuilder YouTube videos on insulin, and forum and social media posts on insulin use for bodybuilding. I also have an endocrinologist colleague who is going to help me make sense of this data."

Now I'm a voracious reader, and it's just really difficult for me to view the objective of this article as nothing more than a summary of self-reports or responses to questionnaire ("perspectives" or "debatable issues") from 20 subjects.

But the real worry I have about this article is that it is on Meso, a steroid harm reduction source, and it doesn't present the scientific or expert rebuttals to the many misconceptions therein (hopefully these are forthcoming); and consequently this article might be referenced by an average reader in support of the reader's erroneous views. For example, a guy might read the following:

"Some bodybuilders suggest that insulin is one of the safest drugs in their arsenal particularly as compared to DNP and trenbolone...
"All bodybuilders stated that hypoglycaemia was easily managed by consuming sugars..."

And be unable to discern between truth and falsehood. Bodybuilder self-reports or answers to questionnaire ("perspectives" or "debatable issues") are just going to be interpreted as authoritative by most of the readership, especially when universally held or majority views.

Just please consider editing this article appropriately when there are (presumably forthcoming) rebuttals from an expert to counter the misconceptions therein.

As a voracious reader, even I usually skip the last couple sentences of an article, as this portion of a writing is typically a conclusion/summary. Without reading the very last sentence, this entire article read like THIS WAS the paper to resolve insulin disagreements with help from your colleague, Richard Holt. I was legitimately wondering where his input was to be found.

Note that as the author of this article, its organization and presentation presents an argument, and this is especially potent in a persuasive writing. By omission of the cardiovascular risks, insulin toxicity/hyperinsulinaemia-induced insulin resistance; by presentation of dosages used, you do have a responsibility arising out of the product of your editing.

I am looking forward to the followup article, though, Mair. You're doing good work on the anthropological and interview side and conferring with good experts. I only take some issue with the way in which the data is being reported to us here (quite apart from anything that you might publish in the literature).

Reply 4 likes

click to expand...
Avatar of Type-IIx Type-IIx Feb 08, 2022 #13

Sure: my use of the science on insulin is to interpret it and decide whether to use it (and how; how much; etc.), or, if too risky, decide not to use it. In the case of insulin, the research led me to recognize its dangerousness, and therefore to not use it myself; and warn others that are amenable, providing references to relevant data.

For example, cardiovascular risks from insulin use I discuss a bit in that "Who SHOULDN'T take slin?" thread. I definitely agree that Palumbo is a dangerous fool btw. Rather, I provided the link because I referenced from my notes an important study:
[19] Herman, M. E., O’Keefe, J. H., Bell, D. S. H., & Schwartz, S. S. (2017). Insulin Therapy Increases Cardiovascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 60(3), 422–434. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2017.09.001

and answered a couple questions about it in that thread.

There's also a strong correlation between increased circulating insulin concentrations and morbidity (but this is largely inferred from epidemiological data).

Further, I think it's worth emphasizing that adding insulin use atop AAS use really is like providing an accelerant to a fire in progression towards type II diabetes as elevated triglycerides, dyslipidemia, endothelial dysfunction, atherosclerosis, hypertension, and prothrombotic activity (all well characterized effects of androgens) are all contributors. Decreased insulin sensitivity a la hyperinsulinemia/insulin toxicity occurs via mechanisms like decreased IR autophosphorylation & consequent GLUT-4 translocation.

All of these distinct risks posed by exogenous insulin use VERY likely contribute to bodybuilders reaching an early grave.

Reply 4 likes

click to expand...
Avatar of Habib Habib Feb 08, 2022 #14

The part about us being ahead of the science is so true. While the side about us spewing bullshit is also true af.

Reply Like

Avatar of Habib Habib Feb 08, 2022 #15

Any comments on the interaction of DNP and Insulin?

"I'm really not going to bore you with long and complicated explanations of how both DNP and insulin work in the body, but I do need to touch on the subject. Many of the articles written about DNP refer to it’s abilities to block the actions of insulin. This is true only in a limited sense. Insulin is released by pancreatic beta cells in response to elevated ATP/ADP ratios. Briefly, when your blood sugar levels rise, your ATP/ADP levels become elevated, inhibiting ATP sensitive potassium ion channels (KATP), altering the membrane potential of the pancreatic cells and causing insulin release. The key point here is that insulin will not be released unless ATP levels within the cells increase. DNP interferes with the protein complex ATP synthase, which allows for the synthesis of ATP from ADP and Pi (inorganic phosphate). Since DNP interferes with a key step in ATP production, obviously ATP levels never elevate within any cell, including pancreatic beta cells. Hence, the feedback system through the KATP channels (at least in regards to insulin release), is disabled, and you effectively make yourself a diabetic while on DNP.
The primary action of insulin in the body is to drive glucose into muscle and liver cells (stored as glycogen) which is converted into ATP. ATP again? Since DNP reduces ATP production significantly, it again interferes with insulin by preventing a significant amount of the glucose that is pushed into cells by insulin from ever being used as energy (at least by the cell). So, what is happening to all of this energy that is being expended through the electron transport chain to turn ADP and Pi into ATP? It’s thrown off as heat, and lots of it. In fact, because the amount of heat produced is a direct correlation of how much DNP is consumed, taking too much DNP will cook you from the inside out. Let me repeat this. Taking too much DNP will fry you like an egg. It doesn’t sound like a pleasant way to die, does it? DNP is not one of those, hey a little did me good, more will do me better kind of substances. A little will do you good and more will burn your ass up.
So, now we understand the ways in which DNP interferes with some of the actions of insulin. Another action of insulin (thank you God) is that it promotes transport of amino acids from the bloodstream into muscles and other cells. Insulin also increases the rate at which amino acids are incorporated into protein. Although DNP does block the release of insulin and prevents a key component of the electron transport chain (ATP synthase, remember?), it does nothing to prevent the aforementioned extremely anabolic affect of insulin. Therefore, when you use DNP, you should be administering insulin at the same time. The exogenous insulin will still work its anabolic magic while the DNP burns off reams of body fat through the resultant metabolic increase." - Jason Mueller.

Reply Like

click to expand...
Avatar of Type-IIx Type-IIx Feb 08, 2022 #16

Well, DNP certainly does block the anabolic effects of exogenous insulin as it sabotages the proton pump and interferes with Pi groups' uptake into the mitochondrial matrix, reducing substrates for ATPase.

Growth requires ATP. The practical purpose of exogenous insulin is growth. DNP works at cross-purposes with this (its purpose is fat loss and it's a very blunt instrument at that).

Insulin promotes skeletal muscle hypertrophy by increased muscle protein synthesis, b) reduced proteolysis, and c) transmembrane transport of AAs (non-BCAAs).

Only one of these (b) is particularly useful in skeletal muscle with the use of DNP for the preservation of muscle and strength. I'd suggest that androgens accomplish anticatabolism in skeletal muscle at low doses better than insulin.

Reply 3 likes

click to expand...

Join the full discussion at the MESO-Rx →

Primary Sidebar

Sponsors

Popular Articles

Anadrol - Oxymetholone - Balkan Anapolon

Can I Make Good Gains with a Winstrol and Anadrol Stack?

Hi Bill, I'm very limited in my choices for a cycle. A friend has a pretty good amount of tablets left over that he'll let me have, but his source has disappeared and I don't know where else to go. All there is is … [Read More...] about Can I Make Good Gains with a Winstrol and Anadrol Stack?

Ask Patrick Arnold - steroid chemist who created THG

Ask Patrick Arnold #4

Prohormones and Fertility Dear Pat, I'm planning on adding a child to the equation soon. Will taking the prohormones mess that up at all? It seems based on the short half-life that there isn't a problem beyond … [Read More...] about Ask Patrick Arnold #4

Deca Durabolin (Nandrolone Decanoate)

How Safe is a Testosterone Plus Deca Durabolin Stack?

Question: Would a 10-week steroid cycle of 600 mg of Testosterone Enanthate and 200mgs of Nandrolone Decanoate weekly be relatively safe with regard to blood lipids? These two studies suggest to me that it would be … [Read More...] about How Safe is a Testosterone Plus Deca Durabolin Stack?

androgen receptors

Androgen Receptors Downregulate Don’t They? Part 1

There is as much misinformation about steroids as there is good information had among bodybuilding enthusiasts. Go to any gym and you will hear some kid spouting off to his buddies about how steroids do this, or how … [Read More...] about Androgen Receptors Downregulate Don’t They? Part 1

Women and weight training

Women and Iron

Too often and much to my dismay, I hear women protest against using any appreciable weight in their weight training program. Moreover, many young women completely refrain from resistance training; instead spending … [Read More...] about Women and Iron

Footer

MESO-Rx International

MESO-Rx articles are also available in the following languages:

Deutsch, English, Español, Français, Português, Русский

Questions? Comments?

Use the following link to send us an e-mail. We will respond as soon as we can.

Contact us.

Search

Copyright © 1997–2025 MESO-Rx. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.