• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Steroid Profiles
  • Steroid Articles
    • Contributors
  • Steroid Forum
MESO-Rx

MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

  • Anabolic Steroids
    • Anadrol
    • Anavar
    • Deca Durabolin
    • Dianabol
    • Equipoise
    • Masteron
    • Oral Turinabol
    • Primobolan Depot
    • Sustanon 250
    • Testosterone
    • Trenbolone Acetate
    • Winstrol Depot
  • hGH & Peptides
    • CJC-1295
    • GHRP-6
    • hGH
    • hCG
    • IGF-1
    • Melanotan II
    • MGF
    • Mod GRF 1-29
    • TB-500
  • Anti-Estrogens
    • Arimidex
    • Aromasin
    • Clomid
    • Letrozole
    • Nolvadex
  • Fat Loss
    • AICAR
    • Albuterol
    • Clenbuterol
    • DNP
    • Ephedrine
    • T3
    • Telmisartan
You are here: Home / Steroid Articles / Ban Athletes Who Don’t Use Steroids

Ban Athletes Who Don’t Use Steroids

September 15, 2006 by Sidney Gendin, Ph.D. Leave a Comment

banned

Isn’t it time for the brainwashed public to know the truth about steroids? In their ideological zeal to ban “performance enhancing” drugs, national governments and the various local and international sports federations have ignorantly and self-righteously declared that steroid use is cheating, dangerous, and stupid. In fact, in general, it is neither dangerous nor stupid and it is cheating only because it has been capriciously commanded to be so.

In the first place, with respect to the alleged danger, people ought to know that there are dozens of steroids and it would be absurd to imagine that their risks are identical. Moreover, steroids come in two broad classes – the orals and the injectables. It is true that most of the orals have associated hazards but not a single one of them is as hazardous as smoking or drinking. The principle dangers of the injectables result from overdosing and, even so, they are mainly such alarming matters as acne and severe headache. Every legally obtainable prescription drug comes with a warning of dozens of worse side effects.

But what is that to you and me? Why should we legislate what risks people should run unless they can interfere with the rest of us? In our democratic, capitalist society many persons risk their last few dollars to start up businesses which will probably fail. We do not stop them. If and when they become multimillionaires we congratulate them. We don’t permit people to drive without seatbelts because their accidents drive up insurance rates for the rest of us but we let people engage in the far riskier business of climbing mountains since the danger is mainly self-regarding. So enough virtue-parading preaching.

As for the so-called cheating, who really are the cheaters? The average steroid user spends about $100-150 per month while the supplement industries grow rich on suckering in the hundreds of thousands, possibly millions, of foolish people spending up to $1000 per month on a variety of mumbo jumbo: androstenedione, 4-androstenedione, 19-androstenedione, androstenediol and the several 4, 5, 17, and 19 varieties of androstenediol, tribulus terrestris, enzymatic conversion accelerators, growth hormone stimulators, hormone-releasing peptides, testosterone “boosters”, dozens of magical herbs and a ridiculous number of “non drugs” with unpronouncable names so they are always abbreviated such as HMB and DHEA. On top of all this, these folks who tend to be more affluent than steroid users, are pumping protein powders into their milk – $9 per day – and gobbling down protein candy bars – up to $3 each – while saving a bit of energy for screaming “Foul! Cheater!” at the poor steroid user. They are told by the manufacturers and distributors of these outlandish products that they look like steroids, feel like steroids and work like steroids. So? Why not ban them like steroids?

But I say ban them and only them. For one thing, they don’t work as well as steroids. More importantly, what care I as a fan that someone sets a remarkable record because he used steroids? I pay money to see sporting events and I am entitled to an athlete’s very best. Isaac Stern can afford a violin that few violinists and no high school orchestra player can afford. Is he taking unfair advantage of them? If I pay $60 to hear Stern and learn his tone was not up to par because he was too lazy to bring his own violin and borrowed a $50 one from a high school kid, I justifiably want my money back. What care I that he usually plays upon a $200,000 instrument? I am not bothered by this; I want his very best. Likewise, I want the very best an athlete can give me. I don’t want to watch athletes who could have done better if only they had used steroids. Talk of steroid performance as unnatural is as ridiculous as complaining about artificial hearts. As for me I plan to have a T-shirt made for me that will read on its front: “Use steroids or go home. Enough of crying and whining.”

About the author

Sidney Gendin
Sidney Gendin, Ph.D.
Professor of Philosophy at Eastern Michigan University

35 years experience as professor of philosophy. Several publications, mainly in ethics and philosophy of law. Co-editor of the massive FREUD ENCYCLOPEDIA. Dozens of lectures at philosophy conferences, at universities and at animal rights meetings.

Filed Under: Steroid Articles

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Sponsors

Popular Articles

How to use Femara (Letrozole)

How to Use Letrozole (Femara)

Femara (letrozole) is a type II (non-steroidal) third generation aromatase inhibitor. Clinically it is used to treat postmenopausal women with either estrogen receptor positive or estrogen receptor unknown breast … [Read More...] about How to Use Letrozole (Femara)

Bodybuilding

Is Bodybuilding Good or Bad for Mental Health?

When academics write about bodybuilders they tend to imply that bodybuilders are a bit weird, or even completely fucked in the head. I started studying bodybuilding because I wanted to correct this. I wanted to talk … [Read More...] about Is Bodybuilding Good or Bad for Mental Health?

Are SARMs Effective for Post Cycle Therapy?

The Use of SARMs During Steroid Cycles or PCT

Q: “How should I incorporate SARMs (selective androgen receptor modulators) into my steroid cycle or into PCT?” You should not do so. Various authors in the scientific literature have tried to make it appear … [Read More...] about The Use of SARMs During Steroid Cycles or PCT

Anabolic Steroids and Aggression

The following is a brief synopsis of a talk given at the 115th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association (APA) in San Francisco, CA on August 19, 2007. Existing research on substance use has had … [Read More...] about Anabolic Steroids and Aggression

Steroid Use and "steroidogenic hibernation"

Are Steroids Your Key to Preventing Andropause?

Long-term suppression of leydig cell steroidogenesis prevents leydig cell aging Researchers: Chen H, Zirkin BR Division of Reproductive Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns Hopkins … [Read More...] about Are Steroids Your Key to Preventing Andropause?

Footer

MESO-Rx International

MESO-Rx articles are also available in the following languages:

Deutsch, English, Español, Français, Português, Русский

Questions? Comments?

Use the following link to send us an e-mail. We will respond as soon as we can.

Contact us.

Search

Copyright © 1997–2026 MESO-Rx. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.