Q: “I started reading your articles back in 1998 and had the chance to interact with you some on the forums as well. From each person’s case being different, there was a lot of variety in your recommendations. But anytime anyone asked your favorite for your personal use, I remember always trenbolone and Dianabol. Is that still your personal favorite or are you doing differently now?”
A: If I had an immediate goal of best physique improvement while using what I feel best on, that would still be my choice. Not that other things actually won’t work as well: best effect absolutely can also be achieved in other ways.
While I always kept health in mind and didn’t at any time do ridiculous things, now at 51 my view is a little different than when in my 30s. I expect that, as my natural bodyweight in lean condition without weight training would be only about 147 lb, in my case it could be too much load on the body to try to permanently maintain as much lean weight as I aimed for in the past. I’m thinking of perhaps being a pound lighter per year, so for example as a 70 year old, there would be no need to be more than say 170 lean, or even actually a muscular 160 could be fine then. Also, though at my present weight of 190 I can’t lift as much (obviously) as before, let alone when 225 and not that fat, overall I’m more athletic when lighter. For example, for example now it’s more important to me to be able to paddle out to the break in difficult conditions when surfing than to have the very highest numbers possible for me in lifting.
So I’m keeping it simple and light now, most of the time. My personal favorite now is simply Masteron and HCG. Very “clean,” very nice.
However, when wanting more effect as occasionally I will, it’s necessary to add something to that, typically testosterone or Dianabol.
I do still occasionally include trenbolone also, simply because I like to.
About the author
Bill Roberts is an internationally-recognized expert on anabolic steroids and performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs). He received a bachelor degree in Microbiology and Cell Science and completed the educational and research requirements for a PhD in Medicinal Chemistry at a major American university.
Bill entered the nutritional supplement industry prior to completing his doctoral thesis but his education was invaluable so far as being able to design/improve nutritional supplement compounds, since it was in the field of designing drug molecules and secondarily some work in transdermal delivery.
His education was not specifically "geared" toward anabolic steroids other than expertise with pharmacological principles having broad applications. This has allowed Bill to provide unique insight into the field of anabolic pharmacology with knowledge of points which he would not have known otherwise.
Rustypelican says
I’ve tried the HCG/Mast E cycle. I really didn’t get much out of it, running 700 mg/wk Mast with 750 mg/wk of HCG, other than some good vascularity and a modest increase in strength. I have also paired it with 500 mg/wk of Sust and experienced similar results as with the HCG, but more acne and estrogenic side effects of course. However, when I added Tren A to that stack, I saw some real results.
Johnny Condo says
Hey Bill! Do you keep the HCG if you add d-bol to that cycle?
I’m learning much from your approach to AAS and I really appreciate the info!
BR
SA says
Bill,
Great to hear you surf. I am getting back into after a layoff and intense bodybuilding.
Dropping weight so I can surf my shortboard. Dang! I am cramping up in the water allot!. Lats and quads. Do you experience that?
Steve