• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Steroid Profiles
  • Steroid Articles
    • Contributors
  • Steroid Forum
MESO-Rx

MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

  • Anabolic Steroids
    • Anadrol
    • Anavar
    • Deca Durabolin
    • Dianabol
    • Equipoise
    • Masteron
    • Oral Turinabol
    • Primobolan Depot
    • Sustanon 250
    • Testosterone
    • Trenbolone Acetate
    • Winstrol Depot
  • hGH & Peptides
    • CJC-1295
    • GHRP-6
    • hGH
    • hCG
    • IGF-1
    • Melanotan II
    • MGF
    • Mod GRF 1-29
    • TB-500
  • Anti-Estrogens
    • Arimidex
    • Aromasin
    • Clomid
    • Letrozole
    • Nolvadex
  • Fat Loss
    • AICAR
    • Albuterol
    • Clenbuterol
    • DNP
    • Ephedrine
    • T3
    • Telmisartan
You are here: Home / Steroid Articles / The Benefits of Boldenone Propionate When Compared to Other Short-Acting Steroid Esters

The Benefits of Boldenone Propionate When Compared to Other Short-Acting Steroid Esters

March 16, 2015 by Bill Roberts Leave a Comment

The Benefits of Boldenone Propionate When Compared to Other Short-Acting Steroid Esters

Q: “I ‘m interested in boldenone propionate. What advantages could it give me compared to other short acting esters? I don’t want to use trenbolone acetate again, as at even 50 mg/day I’m really a bastard to my girlfriend, even more so than usual. More importantly, I don’t sleep well. And I’m not a fan of testosterone propionate due to post-injection pain. I’ve never used boldenone at all, so can you tell me about it?”

A: The idea of boldenone propionate is great, as personal opinion. Boldenone has a relatively favorable side effect profile compared to most other anabolic steroids. Conversion to estrogen is low, and if anything the modest amount of conversion can be beneficial if no other aromatizing steroid is being used. Unlike testosterone, it’s not potentiated in the skin or scalp. Boldenone typically has little in the way of adverse effect on mood. The most common problems are increased appetite (in cases where that’s experienced as a problem) and at higher doses, sometimes a feverish feeling. But in general, it’s very well tolerated at modest dosages such as up to 400-500 mg/week and sometimes more.

Problem, however, can result from the long half life of the undecylenate ester form typically used for boldenone, as in the Equipoise product. The half life of up to about 2 weeks results in very slow transition from anabolically-useful high androgen levels to recovery-permitting low androgen levels.

For example, let’s say that 500 mg/week Equipoise is being taken as the injectable part of a steroid stack. That, particularly in combination with an oral, can be very effective.

A week after the last injection, really we would like recovery to be occurring. It won’t be, however. Blood levels of boldenone will be comparable to ongoing use of about 350 mg/week of Equipoise. Such a level on its own might provide a slow degree of anabolic effectiveness relative to a starting natural state, but after the gains of a cycle have already been made, this is far too little for still-further gains. Recovery won’t occur and neither willgains. Time of HPTA suppression, however, will accumulate.

How about 2 weeks after the last injection? Levels are now comparable to ongoing use of about 250 mg/week. Same story.

Typically, in practice with an Equipoise cycle it’s about a month before good recovery can begin (it can be less with lower dosages.)

Boldenone propionate, in contrast, has a half-life of probably only about two days. It would provide a very sharp transition of blood levels. So you would be either making progress anabolically, or be starting your recovery.

The theory offers promise.

In practice, boldenone propionate injections are exceptionally painful. Personally, I find even 25 mg/mL concentration to be unacceptable for use. Others also have had findings of greater pain with this injection than any other.

Hypothetically, either the phenylpropionate or acetate ester of boldenone might well provide the benefit of short half-life and pain-free injection, but so far as I know these are not available.

I would suggest either trying testosterone propionate at only a 50 mg/mL concentration, which can be painless, or testosterone acetate at that same concentration, or no more than 100 mg/mL.

The Benefits of Boldenone Propionate When Compared to Other Short-Acting Steroid Esters
The Benefits of Boldenone Propionate When Compared to Other Short-Acting Steroid Esters

About the author

Bill Roberts
Medicinal chemist

Bill Roberts is an internationally-recognized expert on anabolic steroids and performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs). He received a bachelor degree in Microbiology and Cell Science and completed the educational and research requirements for a PhD in Medicinal Chemistry at a major American university.

Bill entered the nutritional supplement industry prior to completing his doctoral thesis but his education was invaluable so far as being able to design/improve nutritional supplement compounds, since it was in the field of designing drug molecules and secondarily some work in transdermal delivery.

His education was not specifically "geared" toward anabolic steroids other than expertise with pharmacological principles having broad applications. This has allowed Bill to provide unique insight into the field of anabolic pharmacology with knowledge of points which he would not have known otherwise.

Filed Under: Steroid Articles Tagged With: Ask Bill Roberts, boldenone

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Sponsors

Popular Articles

Lisinopril

Ask Bill Roberts #5

ACE Inhibitors During a Steroid Cycle Dear Bill,I saw your answer last month on using ACE inhibitors like Capoten during a steroid cycle. I can't seem to get any from my usual black market sources. And how much … [Read More...] about Ask Bill Roberts #5

Ask Lyle McDonald - training, nutrition, cyclical ketogenic diet, dieting

Ask Lyle McDonald #3

Dear Lyle, My name is Kirk. I'm a 29 year old amateur. kickboxer. I suffered a nerve injury and wasn't able to train. In this time I put on a lot of weight and have not been able to take it off. I, like yourself … [Read More...] about Ask Lyle McDonald #3

Ask Charles Staley training questions

Ask Charles Staley #7

Mr. Staley, I am a competitive bodybuilder and personal trainer with a degree in exercise physiology. I have learned a great deal from your website and articles. Recently a friend of mine who is a high school … [Read More...] about Ask Charles Staley #7

Mark McGwire's Little Helper: The Androstenedione Debate

Mark McGwire’s Little Helper: The Androstenedione Debate

In 1935 -- the year testosterone was first synthesized in the laboratory -- the Food and Drug Administration established a unit to monitor the quality of the numerous "glandular" products on the market that were … [Read More...] about Mark McGwire’s Little Helper: The Androstenedione Debate

Center for Social Development and Education (CSDE), anti-steroid advocacy and steroid use by adolescents

American Public Believes Teenagers Have Bigger Problems Than Steroids – And They’re Right

The American public believes that teenagers are facing much more serious problems in high schools today than the threat of anabolic steroids. This was the finding of a recent national survey study published by the … [Read More...] about American Public Believes Teenagers Have Bigger Problems Than Steroids – And They’re Right

Footer

MESO-Rx International

MESO-Rx articles are also available in the following languages:

Deutsch, English, Español, Français, Português, Русский

Questions? Comments?

Use the following link to send us an e-mail. We will respond as soon as we can.

Contact us.

Search

Copyright © 1997–2025 MESO-Rx. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.