• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Steroid Profiles
  • Steroid Articles
    • Contributors
  • Steroid Forum
MESO-Rx

MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

  • Anabolic Steroids
    • Anadrol
    • Anavar
    • Deca Durabolin
    • Dianabol
    • Equipoise
    • Masteron
    • Oral Turinabol
    • Primobolan Depot
    • Sustanon 250
    • Testosterone
    • Trenbolone Acetate
    • Winstrol Depot
  • hGH & Peptides
    • CJC-1295
    • GHRP-6
    • hGH
    • hCG
    • IGF-1
    • Melanotan II
    • MGF
    • Mod GRF 1-29
    • TB-500
  • Anti-Estrogens
    • Arimidex
    • Aromasin
    • Clomid
    • Letrozole
    • Nolvadex
  • Fat Loss
    • AICAR
    • Albuterol
    • Clenbuterol
    • DNP
    • Ephedrine
    • T3
    • Telmisartan
You are here: Home / Steroid Articles / Are Gains More Permanent with Oral Steroid Cycles?

Are Gains More Permanent with Oral Steroid Cycles?

May 21, 2010 by William Llewellyn Leave a Comment

Dianabol tablets, methandienone, methandrostenolone

Hi William: I’ve been on and off steroids for years. I respond well to them even at pretty low doses (300-600mg/week), but always crash afterwards no matter what I do. Lately I’ve been trying something different. For the past 12 weeks I’ve been taking 100mg of orals (Winstrol, Dianabol, Anadrol) per week, and have slowly been gaining size (about 5 pounds of lean mass) and strength. I am hoping this will produce more permanent gains; less estrogen conversion to worry about and it shouldn’t suppress my natural testosterone. Do you have any knowledge of the efficacy of low-dose long-term use of anabolics?

A: Given that most of the oral anabolics have less estrogenicity than the standard of reference (testosterone), you should find that size is better maintained at the conclusion of a cycle compared to injectable testosterones, as you are holding, and as a result will be excreting, less water weight. When all is said and done, you’ll seem to hold more of the weight you gained on oral anabolics simply because more of what you gained was quality muscle (not water bulk) in the first place. Anadrol is an exception among your list as it is highly estrogenic. Given the doses you are using, however, I suspect you will not notice this trait much, and (in line with what you stated) should be noticing some modest but measurable gains in strength and lean muscle mass. In the end you’ll probably gain more lean mass on a formidable dose of testosterone, but again, the difference between your on-cycle bulk weight and your off-cycle retained mass weight will be more noticeable on a cycle like this too.

If my math is correct, you are taking about 15 milligrams of oral anabolics per day. I don’t want you to be mistaken into thinking this is a “very low” dose. O.K., by some of the standards of excess today it may be considered low, but in a clinical sense it most certainly is not. Winstrol is given at a dose of 6 milligrams per day or less most commonly. When Dianabol was widely prescribed in the U.S., the common application was 5 milligrams per day. Aside from Anadrol, the doses you are taking are outside of the therapeutic range, and enough to present significant gains in lean tissue, as you have noticed. In fact, during the 1960’s and ‘70s fifteen milligrams per day was a common dose for athletes and bodybuilders. This level of use is also more than sufficient to suppress natural testosterone production, so you still going to have to deal with some type of crash at the conclusion of this cycle, even if it is less pronounced due to less water retention. As such, a proper PCT (Post-Cycle Therapy) program is probably a good idea to look at.

The main concern I have with this practice is the fact that you are applying a sufficient dose of c-17 alpha alkylated oral steroids each day, and it is continuing for a significant amount of time. The usual cutoff point is 6-8 weeks. Immediately, I would question what your serum lipids are doing. How are you HDL (good) and LDL (bad) cholesterol levels responding to this cycle? As you may know, oral c-17 alpha alkylated steroids present much more toxicity to the body than injectable testosterones (and related non-alkylated steroids). They tend to greatly shift the HDL:LDL balance in an unfavorable direction (increasing the risk of cardiovascular disease), and place some strain on the liver. While I wouldn’t be go so far as to say this type of practice is outright dangerous to your immediate health, I would most certainly recommend that you take caution. With any oral cycle, especially one going on for a prolonged period of time, you should be getting periodic checks on your lipids, liver enzymes, blood pressure, and general markers of health. If you find the drugs are placing too much strain on your body, they probably aren’t worth it. If you find such is true in your situation, you’d likely be much better off looking back at the old standby injectables like testosterone and nandrolone, which present no significant liver stress and have a much lower negative effect on serum lipids – crash and water retention be damned.

Dianabol aka Dbol (methandrostenolone, methandienone); Brand: Acdhon Methandon
Dianabol aka Dbol (methandrostenolone, methandienone); Brand: Acdhon Methandon

About the author

William Llewellyn

William Llewellyn is a research scientist and writer in the field of human performance enhancement. He is the author of several books including Underground Anabolics and Anabolics 10th Edition, one of the most widely read titles on the subject of performance enhancing substances.

Filed Under: Steroid Articles

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Sponsors

Popular Articles

Older man using anabolic steroids

From Midlife to Muscle: Understanding Steroid Use Among Older Men

Introduction Among readers of MESO-Rx, it's well-known that men over 40 form a significant portion of the anabolic androgenic steroid (AAS) user base. Historically, the primary demographics of the site's users … [Read More...] about From Midlife to Muscle: Understanding Steroid Use Among Older Men

Trenbolone unique aspects

Trenbolone Insights: Unique Characteristics of Anabolic-Androgenic Steroids – Part 1

Introduction This is part one of an eleven-part series (1 / 11) that will delve into the unique features of anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS) by compound or drug. It’s an exciting opportunity – (and to be frank, … [Read More...] about Trenbolone Insights: Unique Characteristics of Anabolic-Androgenic Steroids – Part 1

The anabolic-androgenic ratio and steroid research

The Anabolic to Androgenic Ratio is Worthless and Hinders the Quest for Safer Steroids & SARMs

Anabolic to androgenic ratio: an introduction Anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS) have anabolic and androgenic properties, hence the name. In general, the anabolic properties are considered to be the … [Read More...] about The Anabolic to Androgenic Ratio is Worthless and Hinders the Quest for Safer Steroids & SARMs

Ask Charles Staley training questions

Ask Charles Staley #10

Soviet Peaking Cycle Q: Charles, I vaguely remember a soviet six week peaking cycle from an old issue of Muscle & Fitness— it's different from the 6 week squat routine that you recently spoke about in … [Read More...] about Ask Charles Staley #10

The Science of Trenbolone, Part 4

The Science of Trenbolone, Part 4

As we close out this article series, there are still some important aspects of trenbolone left to cover. So, in this final installment, we are going to start off discussing how androgens impact fat stores. We’ll … [Read More...] about The Science of Trenbolone, Part 4

Footer

MESO-Rx International

MESO-Rx articles are also available in the following languages:

Deutsch, English, Español, Français, Português, Русский

Questions? Comments?

Use the following link to send us an e-mail. We will respond as soon as we can.

Contact us.

Search

Copyright © 1997–2026 MESO-Rx. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.