• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Steroid Profiles
  • Steroid Articles
    • Contributors
  • Steroid Forum
MESO-Rx

MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

  • Anabolic Steroids
    • Anadrol
    • Anavar
    • Deca Durabolin
    • Dianabol
    • Equipoise
    • Masteron
    • Oral Turinabol
    • Primobolan Depot
    • Sustanon 250
    • Testosterone
    • Trenbolone Acetate
    • Winstrol Depot
  • hGH & Peptides
    • CJC-1295
    • GHRP-6
    • hGH
    • hCG
    • IGF-1
    • Melanotan II
    • MGF
    • Mod GRF 1-29
    • TB-500
  • Anti-Estrogens
    • Arimidex
    • Aromasin
    • Clomid
    • Letrozole
    • Nolvadex
  • Fat Loss
    • AICAR
    • Albuterol
    • Clenbuterol
    • DNP
    • Ephedrine
    • T3
    • Telmisartan
You are here: Home / Steroid Articles / Safety and Effectiveness of Testosterone at 1000 Milligrams per Week

Safety and Effectiveness of Testosterone at 1000 Milligrams per Week

November 5, 2019 by Bill Roberts

Sustanon (Balkan Pharma)

Q: You talked about a gram per week of testosterone. Isn’t that ridiculous? What about say 200 mg?

A: It is my view that the farther one is from one’s natural, untrained state, the harder it is to gain more muscle. There comes a point where the body essentially finds a new balance and may remain at the same muscular weight (give or take a pound or two) for a year or more, even with excellent training, if hormonal conditions remain the same.

Under different hormonal conditions – for example, more testosterone – growth can resume and a new balance point, if reached, will be at a considerably higher muscular weight. At that point, even if one were to stay on that dose of drug continually, little gains would be seen. But with higher yet levels of testosterone, rapid growth could again resume.

So a person who has already made a lot of gains is probably not going to see much, if anything, from 200 mg/week testosterone. And if he used steroids to get there, and is already more muscular than he’d be as a natural trainer, he may see nothing at all, just maintenance.

A true beginner, on the other hand, can make plenty of gains with natural levels of testosterone.

From the medical standpoint, 600 mg/week has been shown to be quite safe. Furthermore, in double blind studies and so forth, doses of less than 300 mg/week generally have resulted in nothing. These studies have usually been with athletes training the same during the cycle as they were beforehand. They’re generally useless for our purposes but they do make a point here. If the dose is 300 mg/week and an athlete trains and eats the same as before, no miracle results.

Yes, I know I’ll come under criticism: you or your buddy did great on 250 mg/week. But in every case I have ever seen, such trainers were guys who were not that dedicated to lifting until they went on their cycle. They weren’t in their peak condition at the start of the cycle, and so they had some muscle memory to help them. Or they were fairly novice lifters. They trained and ate better than they ever did before. They probably would have regained 10 lb. of muscle and gained a new 10 lb. just on Placebobolan, thanks to the training, nutrition, intensity, and muscle memory. Those who ate enough to get fat will also attribute some of the fat weight as being muscle weight.

Now there is one regard where a low dose can be quite effective. This is in fat loss. Many people, especially natural endomorphs, can enjoy easy fat loss for the first time in their lives on quite moderate doses such as 250 mg/week.

I would say that 500 mg/week is a reasonable minimum for muscle gains, except for an advanced trainer, who may need a gram a week to make much further gains. To advance to today’s pro bodybuilder status, even if one has the genetics, requires more yet, not just in quantity but in supplementary drugs such as growth hormone (GH) and insulin, which I will not be discussing.

Supertest testosterone blend (SP Labs)
Testosterone blend (SP Labs)
Testanon 400 testosterone blend (SIS Labs)
Testosterone blend (SIS Labs)

About the author

Bill Roberts
Medicinal chemist

Bill Roberts is an internationally-recognized expert on anabolic steroids and performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs). He received a bachelor degree in Microbiology and Cell Science and completed the educational and research requirements for a PhD in Medicinal Chemistry at a major American university.

Bill entered the nutritional supplement industry prior to completing his doctoral thesis but his education was invaluable so far as being able to design/improve nutritional supplement compounds, since it was in the field of designing drug molecules and secondarily some work in transdermal delivery.

His education was not specifically "geared" toward anabolic steroids other than expertise with pharmacological principles having broad applications. This has allowed Bill to provide unique insight into the field of anabolic pharmacology with knowledge of points which he would not have known otherwise.

Filed Under: Steroid Articles Tagged With: Ask Bill Roberts, testosterone

Primary Sidebar

Sponsors

Popular Articles

Steroids, Sluggers, and the War on Drugs

Steroids, Sluggers, and the War on Drugs

Last week's US congressional hearings on steroids in baseball should be seen as the dying gasp of a failed exercise in social engineering. The idea that America's national pastime can help to remedy our social ills … [Read More...] about Steroids, Sluggers, and the War on Drugs

fitness revolution

Fitness Culture and IPEDs: Crisis, revolution, and the digital push, 1990-2020

The history of doping is also a history of modernity and the plastic and changeable body. Through ideas about performing bodies, various sports have been successfully modernized since the mid-1800s (Dimeo, 2007). … [Read More...] about Fitness Culture and IPEDs: Crisis, revolution, and the digital push, 1990-2020

Is Dianabol a Good Choice for a Steroid Bridge?

Is Dianabol a Good Choice for a Steroid Bridge?

Question: Is Dianabol a good anabolic for a "steroid bridge" since it's not really suppressive of natural testosterone production? Answer: Dianabol adversely affects the HPTA. There is a lot of commentary, both in … [Read More...] about Is Dianabol a Good Choice for a Steroid Bridge?

World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), anabolic steroids and doping

Steroids + Narcotics = Fuzzy Math

Just when you thought social control agencies had run out of ways to demonize anabolic steroids, along comes a new study out of Stockholm, Sweden. Funded in part by grants from the intensely anti-steroid World … [Read More...] about Steroids + Narcotics = Fuzzy Math

Don’t Confuse Me with the Facts: Doctors Have Their Own Opinions on Steroids!

This was a difficult article for me to write. My intent is not to accuse the medical community, as a whole, of grossly misleading the general public about the effects of anabolic steroids. This is mainly because … [Read More...] about Don’t Confuse Me with the Facts: Doctors Have Their Own Opinions on Steroids!

Footer

MESO-Rx International

MESO-Rx articles are also available in the following languages:

Deutsch, English, Español, Français, Português, Русский

Questions? Comments?

Use the following link to send us an e-mail. We will respond as soon as we can.

Contact us.

Search

Copyright © 1997–2026 MESO-Rx. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.