• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Steroid Profiles
  • Steroid Articles
    • Contributors
  • Steroid Forum
MESO-Rx

MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

  • Anabolic Steroids
    • Anadrol
    • Anavar
    • Deca Durabolin
    • Dianabol
    • Equipoise
    • Masteron
    • Oral Turinabol
    • Primobolan Depot
    • Sustanon 250
    • Testosterone
    • Trenbolone Acetate
    • Winstrol Depot
  • hGH & Peptides
    • CJC-1295
    • GHRP-6
    • hGH
    • hCG
    • IGF-1
    • Melanotan II
    • MGF
    • Mod GRF 1-29
    • TB-500
  • Anti-Estrogens
    • Arimidex
    • Aromasin
    • Clomid
    • Letrozole
    • Nolvadex
  • Fat Loss
    • AICAR
    • Albuterol
    • Clenbuterol
    • DNP
    • Ephedrine
    • T3
    • Telmisartan
You are here: Home / Steroid News / Abuses by the Justice Department in Mitchell Report Steroid Scandal

Abuses by the Justice Department in Mitchell Report Steroid Scandal

January 25, 2008 by Millard Leave a Comment

The $20 million dollar Mitchell Report on anabolic steroids in professional baseball relied largely on the testimony of two former baseball trainers, Kirk Radomski and Brian McNamee. And the only reason the Mitchell Report contained such such evidence of steroid use by baseball players was because the Department of Justice forced Radomski and McNamee to cooperate with investigators from the Mitchell Report as a condition of their plea agreements. Was this an abuse of the government’s criminal powers? Was this legal? Was this ethical?

Frank Bowman, a former prosecutor and current law professor at the University of Missouri-Columbia, posted some interesting thoughts on the matter on Slate. The Justice Department’s behavior is problematic when it comes to “grand jury secrecy laws” and its policy on “uncharged third parties”:

A mere allegation of criminal wrongdoing coming from government sources can wreck a life or a career. If formal charges are filed, the defendant will at least have his day in court to admit or attempt to disprove the government’s case. But if the allegation comes in a report issued by the private sector, but engineered by the government, the reputational damage is done, and the defendant has no forum in which to contest it.

For precisely this reason, by law, federal grand jury proceedings are secret to protect the reputations of those who are investigated but never prosecuted. Historically, Department of Justice policy has been even more sensitive to these interests. In public filings and proceedings, the DoJ’s Principles of Federal Prosecution require prosecutors to “remain sensitive to the privacy and reputation interests of uncharged third-parties,” which “means that, in the absence of some significant justification, it is not appropriate to identify … or cause a defendant to identify, a third-party wrongdoer unless that party has been officially charged with the misconduct at issue.” (The italics are mine.)

Technically, the deals requiring McNamee and Radomski to cooperate with Mitchell probably don’t violate grand jury secrecy laws, because those laws bind prosecutors, agents, and grand jurors, but not witnesses like McNamee and Radomski. And technically, those deals might not have violated DoJ policy on uncharged third parties, inasmuch as Clemens and other players weren’t actually named in official filings or in a federal courtroom. But using plea bargaining leverage to require witnesses to divulge to Mitchell the names of people the Justice Department never intended to prosecute surely violated the purposes of both grand jury secrecy law and DoJ policy.

The requirement for Radomski and McNamee to cooperate with Mitchell was clearly outlined in their plea agreements: 

I will cooperate with non-governmental anti-doping agencies at the direction of the government. I understand that this cooperation may include interviews, statements, or other proceedings.

Frank Bowman goes on to suggest that this potential abuse of government powers is serious enough for Congress to call a formal investigation.

Now, if you think that Professor Bowman is somehow sympathetic to Major League Baseball players who have used anabolic steroids or growth hormone, think again. Bowman believes the “hierarchy of the performance-enhancing drug market for professional athletes” is such that federal prosecutors should primarily target the “athletes” and not the “dealers” which is contrary to the customary prosecutorial practice of pursuing dealers instead of users.

Even if you agree with government involvement in anti-doping efforts of private sporting leagues, there should always be limitations on government behavior to prevent abuses of power.

Source: Slate

About the author

Millard
Millard
MESO-Rx | Website

Millard writes about anabolic steroids and performance enhancing drugs and their use and impact in sport and society. He discusses the medical and non-medical uses of anabolic-androgenic steroids while advocating a harm reduction approach to steroid education.

Filed Under: Steroid News Tagged With: anabolic steroids

No replies yet

Start the discussion →

Loading new replies...

Join the full discussion at the MESO-Rx →

Primary Sidebar

Sponsors

Popular Articles

Testosterone enanthate and trenbolone acetate (Pharmacom Labs)

Should Trenbolone Be Stacked with Testosterone?

Q: How do you feel about using trenbolone by itself? Many people say this is a bad idea. But what is the rationale for stacking trenbolone with testosterone? How would you suggest combining trenbolone and … [Read More...] about Should Trenbolone Be Stacked with Testosterone?

Ask Charles Staley training questions

Ask Charles Staley #9

Q: Dear Charles, I would like information on how to develop arm strength for Little Leaguers. My son is 11 and daughter is 8. Is there a difference in the development in a girl's arm than a boy's arm? Also what … [Read More...] about Ask Charles Staley #9

Proviron

The Most Common Mistakes Seen in Anabolic Steroid Cycles

Q: “What compounds are usually or always mistakes to include in a cycle? Or are common mistakes in some instances, but useful in others.” A: Proviron is never useful during a cycle. The closest it could be to being … [Read More...] about The Most Common Mistakes Seen in Anabolic Steroid Cycles

DNP (2,4 dinitrophenol), bodybuilding and fat loss

DNP Instead of Anabolic Steroids

Dear Lyle, I read your DNP experiences from MFW.  I started doing some research and I have come to the conclusion that DNP is not something I want to mess with. I have almost the exact same lean body mass as … [Read More...] about DNP Instead of Anabolic Steroids

Oral Turinabol (Pharmacom Labs)

Do Halotestin, Oral-Turinabol and Methyltestosterone Have Any Advantages Over Dianabol, Anadrol, Anavar and Winstrol?

Q: “Why limit the oral choices in my cycles to Dianabol, Anadrol, oxandrolone, or Winstrol? I can get methyltestosterone, Halotestin, or Oral-Turinabol as well.” A: I think it's really not a question of … [Read More...] about Do Halotestin, Oral-Turinabol and Methyltestosterone Have Any Advantages Over Dianabol, Anadrol, Anavar and Winstrol?

Footer

MESO-Rx International

MESO-Rx articles are also available in the following languages:

Deutsch, English, Español, Français, Português, Русский

Questions? Comments?

Use the following link to send us an e-mail. We will respond as soon as we can.

Contact us.

Search

Copyright © 1997–2025 MESO-Rx. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.