• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Steroid Profiles
  • Steroid Articles
    • Contributors
  • Steroid Forum
MESO-Rx

MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

  • Anabolic Steroids
    • Anadrol
    • Anavar
    • Deca Durabolin
    • Dianabol
    • Equipoise
    • Masteron
    • Oral Turinabol
    • Primobolan Depot
    • Sustanon 250
    • Testosterone
    • Trenbolone Acetate
    • Winstrol Depot
  • hGH & Peptides
    • CJC-1295
    • GHRP-6
    • hGH
    • hCG
    • IGF-1
    • Melanotan II
    • MGF
    • Mod GRF 1-29
    • TB-500
  • Anti-Estrogens
    • Arimidex
    • Aromasin
    • Clomid
    • Letrozole
    • Nolvadex
  • Fat Loss
    • AICAR
    • Albuterol
    • Clenbuterol
    • DNP
    • Ephedrine
    • T3
    • Telmisartan
You are here: Home / Steroid News / Common Doping Test for Athletes is Unfair (and Racist)

Common Doping Test for Athletes is Unfair (and Racist)

March 23, 2008 by Millard Leave a Comment

The testosterone:epitestosterone ratio (T:E ratio) test is a commonly used test designed to catch athletes who artificially manipulate their testosterone levels (usually with exogenous testosterone). The T:E ratio is routinely used in doping protocols around the world at all levels of sport.

Unfortunately, the T:E ratio is not very effective. This has been common knowledge among drug tested athletes for some time. Dan Duchaine first alerted athletes decades ago with Victor Conte concurring more recently. Anti-doping experts such as Charles Yesalis and Don Catlin have reluctantly acknowledged that this is true.

It is not very reliable. It is flawed. The T:E ratio test results in a lot of false negatives (athletes use testosterone but don’t get caught) as well as false positives (innocent athletes test positive for steroid use).

A recent study that we learned about on Trust But Verify and reported on at Steroid Report explains why the test is unreliable and ineffective.

It appears that certain genotypes are more likely to have false negatives (athletes use testosterone but don’t get caught)and other genotypes are more likely to have false positives (innocent athletes test positive for steroid use) (Doping Test in Sports Confounded by Common Genetic Trait, March 21).

If you’re a genetically gifted athlete (i.e. you lack the gene that produces the enzyme UGT2B17), you can take an whopping injection of at least 360 milligrams of testosterone without getting caught by the testosterone:epitestosterone ratio test (T:E ratio). This testosterone loophole in drug testing has been known by athletes for decades (anecdotally). It is nice to have solid scientific evidence to confirm it.

The 360 mg corresponds to a 500 mg intramuscular injection of testosterone enanthate. Yes, many athletes can take this quantity of the anabolic-androgenic steroid testosterone and still pass current WADA doping controls.

The T:E ratio test discriminates based on the ethnicity of the athlete subjected to the doping protocol. This little bit of information is impossible to overlook.

So, which ethnic groups are most likely to have false negatives on the T:E ratio test?

The latest study suggests as many as 40% of athletes with UGT2B17 homozygous deletion/deletion genotype can take at least 500 mg of testosterone enanthate and still maintain a 4:1 T:E ratio. The following lists various ethnic groups with the estimated percentage that possess the “doping friendly” genotype (data extracted from here and here).

  • 78.0% – Mulatto (Brazilian)
  • 66.7% – Eastern Asian (Korean)
  • 57.3% – Cape Colored (Cape Town, South Africa)
  • 37.6% – Mexican Mestizo
  • 30.4% – Asian Pacific (Southeast Asian/Southern Chinese, Asian Indian, Japanese)
  • 29.1% – Black (African Americans, African Blacks, South/Central American Blacks)
  • 9.3% – White Caucasian (Swedish)
  • 3.5% – White Caucasian (primarily European)

Yes, athletes with UGT2B17 homozygous deletion/deletion genotype are much more likely to pass a doping test if they choose to cheat (false negative). And yes, certain ethnic groups are much more likely to possess this genotype.

What should WADA do about this? Is this a problem for professional sports or high school districts that routinely use the T:E ratio test?

About the author

Millard
Millard
MESO-Rx | Website

Millard writes about anabolic steroids and performance enhancing drugs and their use and impact in sport and society. He discusses the medical and non-medical uses of anabolic-androgenic steroids while advocating a harm reduction approach to steroid education.

Filed Under: Steroid News Tagged With: anti-doping, doping, testosterone

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Sponsors

Popular Articles

hgh fragments

Synthesized Fragments of Hormones Make their Debut

Our body is an enigmatic soup of many hormones and growth factors that determine how we develop, grow and age. One of the hormones primarily responsible for much of our early growth is aptly named ‘growth hormone.’ … [Read More...] about Synthesized Fragments of Hormones Make their Debut

Viagra (sildenafil) as a performance-enhancing drugs

Lesser Known Pharmacological Ergogens

The use and abuse of performance-enhancing substances by athletes has been an issue in sports since the ancient Greeks. Not until the advent of modern health science in the twentieth century though has performance … [Read More...] about Lesser Known Pharmacological Ergogens

Aromasin - Exemestane

Rationale for the Use of Aromasin with Tamoxifen During Post Cycle Therapy

Aromasin (Exemestane) is one of those weird compounds that nobody really knows what to do with. What we generally hear about it makes it very uninteresting…It’s a third generation Aromatase Inhibitor (AI) just like … [Read More...] about Rationale for the Use of Aromasin with Tamoxifen During Post Cycle Therapy

primbolan

Ask Bill Roberts #15

What to stack with Primo? Dear Mr. Roberts, For my first cycle, can I use Primobolan injections alone? I know that with Primo, I will have little to no negative side effects, and only make moderate gains, but … [Read More...] about Ask Bill Roberts #15

Why Do You Recommend Against Spot Injections?

Why Do You Recommend Against Spot Injections?

Hi Bill, I've read that you do not recommend spot injections. How come? I’ve injected in my biceps, triceps, and calves without problems. Are you going soft on us? A: No, I don’t think I am. Maybe it could be said I … [Read More...] about Why Do You Recommend Against Spot Injections?

Footer

MESO-Rx International

MESO-Rx articles are also available in the following languages:

Deutsch, English, Español, Français, Português, Русский

Questions? Comments?

Use the following link to send us an e-mail. We will respond as soon as we can.

Contact us.

Search

Copyright © 1997–2026 MESO-Rx. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.