• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Steroid Profiles
  • Steroid Articles
    • Contributors
  • Steroid Forum
MESO-Rx

MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

  • Anabolic Steroids
    • Anadrol
    • Anavar
    • Deca Durabolin
    • Dianabol
    • Equipoise
    • Masteron
    • Oral Turinabol
    • Primobolan Depot
    • Sustanon 250
    • Testosterone
    • Trenbolone Acetate
    • Winstrol Depot
  • hGH & Peptides
    • CJC-1295
    • GHRP-6
    • hGH
    • hCG
    • IGF-1
    • Melanotan II
    • MGF
    • Mod GRF 1-29
    • TB-500
  • Anti-Estrogens
    • Arimidex
    • Aromasin
    • Clomid
    • Letrozole
    • Nolvadex
  • Fat Loss
    • AICAR
    • Albuterol
    • Clenbuterol
    • DNP
    • Ephedrine
    • T3
    • Telmisartan
You are here: Home / Steroid News / Julie Coram Case Exposes Unfairness of FAME Natural Bodybuilding

Julie Coram Case Exposes Unfairness of FAME Natural Bodybuilding

August 2, 2008 by Millard Leave a Comment

The Julie Coram case has exposed the incompetence and unfairness of the “natural” bodybuilding competitions sponsored by FAME and the World Natural Sports Organization (WNSO). Coram was stripped of her WNSO pro card after testing positive for metabolites of three different anabolic steroids, boldenone, oxandrolone and DHEA after winning the Ainsley McSorley FAME Model Search Championships in Winnipeg.

Coram has now been stripped of her title and banned from the organization due to her choices as we are serious when it comes to our drug testing procedures and want to keep not only a natural stage but a healthy stage too.

Rick Collins and Mike DiMaggio of Collins, McDonald and Gann recently reported the drug test results of Julie Coram conducted by a legitimate anti-doping organization.

…Julie Coram was subjected to an impromptu drug test by the Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport (CCES), the testing body responsible for administering drug testing under the Canadian BodyBuilding Federation’s (CBBF) anti-doping program. The results are in, and Ms. Coram tested negative for all prohibited methods and substances.

Collins compares and contrasts the fairness and reliability of the CBBF testing protocols with those of FAME.

We are grateful that the CBBF subjected Julie Coram to a prompt, fair and reliable drug test, said Rick Collins, an authority in the field of doping legalities and Ms. Coram’s lawyer. The results were not at all surprising to us.  She tested absolutely clean “ she had no traces whatsoever of any banned substances in her sample. Julie has been exonerated.  Collins said that the result is particularly significant because the testing protocol of CBBF is stricter and more sophisticated than the test that FAME conducted.  It is also significant in light of the substances that Julie was alleged to have tested positive for, which included a metabolite of a horse steroid that is reportedly detectable for up to five months.

Drug testing expert Dr. Mauro DiPasquale weighs in on the lack of crediblity of FAME’s anti-doping procedures.

The CBBF result casts serious doubt on credibility of the FAME test.  World renowned doping control expert Dr. Mauro DiPasquale, who was not involved in the case but read the media coverage of Ms. Coram’s alleged positive test, commented: Inferior drug testing protocols can yield inaccurate results; however, the reliability of the CCES drug testing protocol is in line with the World Anti-Doping Agency, which is considered the gold standard for drug testing.

FAME asserts it is “serious” about drug testing. In actuality, FAME is seriously incompetent. Rather than follow the “gold standard” of athletic anti-doping procedures consistent with WADA, they have chosen ridiculous procedures such as “Physique Screening” and “Voice Stress Analysis.”

Neither is FAME serious about maintaining a “natural” competition. Their rules permit everything that can be purchased over the counter at a supplement store. Prohormones and prosteroid formulations sold over the counter (including 22 OTC dietary supplements that contain anabolic steroids) are technically allowed under FAME/WNSO. In other words, FAME/WNSO rules permit competitors to use some anabolic steroids. In addition, FAME/WNSO openly admits the inefficacy of the urinalysis and the problem with false positives from over the counter supplements.

One thing that is clearly worse than no drug testing in bodybuilding is incompetent, unfair, and unreliable drug testing.

Rick Collins still has hope for FAME.

Or better yet, perhaps natural bodybuilders should just abandon FAME in favor of a real natural bodybuilding organization like the World Natural Bodybuilding Federation (WNBF) who is serious about drug testing and conducts its anti-doping procedures in a manner consistent with the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA).

About the author

Millard
Millard
MESO-Rx | Website

Millard writes about anabolic steroids and performance enhancing drugs and their use and impact in sport and society. He discusses the medical and non-medical uses of anabolic-androgenic steroids while advocating a harm reduction approach to steroid education.

Filed Under: Steroid News Tagged With: boldenone, equipoise, steroids

No replies yet

Start the discussion →

Loading new replies...

Join the full discussion at the MESO-Rx →

Primary Sidebar

Sponsors

Popular Articles

Balkan Pharmaceuticals Clenbuterol

Clenbuterol Sabotages Adaptation to Training

Attenuating the decline in ATP arrests the exercise training-induced increases in muscle GLUT4 protein and citrate synthase activity. Researchers: Yaspelkis BB 3rd, Castle AL, Ding Z, Ivy JL Department of … [Read More...] about Clenbuterol Sabotages Adaptation to Training

Women and Short-Acting Versus Long-Acting Injectable Anabolic Steroids

Q: “Which is better for a woman to use, long-acting injectable steroid esters, or short-acting? I mean in terms of risk of virilization versus anabolic benefit. And, should women front-load anabolic steroids at the … [Read More...] about Women and Short-Acting Versus Long-Acting Injectable Anabolic Steroids

Ask Patrick Arnold - steroid chemist who created THG

Ask Patrick Arnold #3

Dear Pat, I have been told that Substrate Solution's Norandrostenediol is the ineffective 19Nor-5androstene-3, 17Diol version and not the 19Nor-4 androstene-3, 17Diol version. Is this true? Answer: You have … [Read More...] about Ask Patrick Arnold #3

MENT insights

MENT Insights: Unique Characteristics of Anabolic-Androgenic Steroids – Part 4

Introduction MENT (trestolone; methylnortestosterone; 7α-methyl-19-nortestosterone; 7α-CH₃-NorT) is a non-5α-reducible androst-4-ene-3-one, potently progestagenic and estrogenic anabolic-androgenic steroid (AAS). … [Read More...] about MENT Insights: Unique Characteristics of Anabolic-Androgenic Steroids – Part 4

SERMs vs. Anti-Aromatase During an Anabolic Steroid Cycle

SERMs vs. Anti-Aromatase During an Anabolic Steroid Cycle

Q: “Over many years I've used a number of steroid cycle plans you've published, as well as completely different advice from others. So I have a lot of different personal results to compare. Your more recent advice … [Read More...] about SERMs vs. Anti-Aromatase During an Anabolic Steroid Cycle

Footer

MESO-Rx International

MESO-Rx articles are also available in the following languages:

Deutsch, English, Español, Français, Português, Русский

Questions? Comments?

Use the following link to send us an e-mail. We will respond as soon as we can.

Contact us.

Search

Copyright © 1997–2025 MESO-Rx. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.