• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Steroid Profiles
  • Steroid Articles
    • Contributors
  • Steroid Forum
MESO-Rx

MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

  • Anabolic Steroids
    • Anadrol
    • Anavar
    • Deca Durabolin
    • Dianabol
    • Equipoise
    • Masteron
    • Oral Turinabol
    • Primobolan Depot
    • Sustanon 250
    • Testosterone
    • Trenbolone Acetate
    • Winstrol Depot
  • hGH & Peptides
    • CJC-1295
    • GHRP-6
    • hGH
    • hCG
    • IGF-1
    • Melanotan II
    • MGF
    • Mod GRF 1-29
    • TB-500
  • Anti-Estrogens
    • Arimidex
    • Aromasin
    • Clomid
    • Letrozole
    • Nolvadex
  • Fat Loss
    • AICAR
    • Albuterol
    • Clenbuterol
    • DNP
    • Ephedrine
    • T3
    • Telmisartan
You are here: Home / Steroid News / Steroid Testing Student Athletes is Unconstitutional in State of Washington

Steroid Testing Student Athletes is Unconstitutional in State of Washington

March 14, 2008 by Millard Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court in the State of Washington ruled that random drug testing of student athletes (which presumably would include steroid testing) was unconstitutional.

Other states allow it. The U.S. Constitution allows it. But the Washington Supreme Court said today that random drug testing of student athletes is not allowed under the state constitution.

If random testing student athletes for steroids and other drugs is consistent with the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, then why does the Washington state constitution prohibit random testing? Quite simply, residents of Washington have more privacy protections than those granted by the U.S. Constitution (“They Ain’t Gonna Pee-Pee in No Cup,” March 14).

The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld random testing not only of athletes but of students participating in other extracurricular activities as well, and its logic (such as it is) suggests that random testing of all students also would be consistent with the Fourth Amendment. But Washington’s constitution has a privacy guarantee that goes beyond the prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures, saying, “No person shall be disturbed in his private affairs, or his home invaded, without authority of law.” The state Supreme Court has read this clause as providing more protection than the Fourth Amendment…

According to Reason, the State of Washington is not the only state whose residents are granted greater privacy protections than the U.S. Constitution (which I suspect would likely also prohibit random steroid testing in student athletes).

Washington is not the only state where residents enjoy more privacy protection than the Fourth Amendment (as currently read) guarantees. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, for example, has taken a dimmer view of student drug testing than the U.S. Supreme Court. The Alaska Supreme Court has interpreted the state constitution’s privacy clause, which says the “right of the people to privacy is recognized and shall not be infringed,” as prohibiting prosecution of people for possessing small amounts of marijuana at home.

The steroid testing trend in public high schools sweeping the nation appears to be permanently stalled in at least a few states.

About the author

Millard
Millard
MESO-Rx | Website

Millard writes about anabolic steroids and performance enhancing drugs and their use and impact in sport and society. He discusses the medical and non-medical uses of anabolic-androgenic steroids while advocating a harm reduction approach to steroid education.

Filed Under: Steroid News Tagged With: drug testing, steroids

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Sponsors

Popular Articles

Guide to Making Your Own Injectable Anabolic Steroids

The Guide to Making Your Own Injectable Anabolic Steroids

Q: "How do I prepare my own injectables from steroid powder that I'm confident is good?" A tremendous amount of money can be saved by preparing one's own injectables, and the process actually can be quite simple. … [Read More...] about The Guide to Making Your Own Injectable Anabolic Steroids

Anabolic steroids, libido and sexual function

Androgens, Libido, and Sexual Function

Androgenic hormones such as testosterone and anabolic steroids (as well as prohormones) have long been used by athletes for their effects on increasing muscle mass and strength. The anabolic effect on muscle is … [Read More...] about Androgens, Libido, and Sexual Function

Are Legal Prohormones Effective Additions to Pharmaceutical Steroid Cycles?

Are Legal Prohormones Effective Additions to Pharmaceutical Steroid Cycles?

Q: “Are any of the prohormone products good additions to a steroid cycle?” A: There's no real reason to add any of them to a properly designed cycle using the standard pharmaceutical anabolic steroids, by which I … [Read More...] about Are Legal Prohormones Effective Additions to Pharmaceutical Steroid Cycles?

Should Testosterone Always Be Used as the Base of a Steroid Cycle?

Should Testosterone Always Be Used as the Base of a Steroid Cycle?

Q: “A lot of advice says testosterone must be used every cycle. But definitely some get great results without it. Does it really need to be used for best results? Why isn't it like with most drugs, for example the … [Read More...] about Should Testosterone Always Be Used as the Base of a Steroid Cycle?

Testosterone enanthate (Pharmacom Labs)

Do You Recommend Testosterone Only Cycles?

Q: I have two 10ml bottles of testosterone enanthate (200mg/ml). Is this enough for a cycle? I read that you should always use testosterone as a base, but that you need to stack it with other drugs too. How do you … [Read More...] about Do You Recommend Testosterone Only Cycles?

Footer

MESO-Rx International

MESO-Rx articles are also available in the following languages:

Deutsch, English, Español, Français, Português, Русский

Questions? Comments?

Use the following link to send us an e-mail. We will respond as soon as we can.

Contact us.

Search

Copyright © 1997–2026 MESO-Rx. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.