• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Steroid Profiles
  • Steroid Articles
    • Contributors
  • Steroid Forum
MESO-Rx

MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

  • Anabolic Steroids
    • Anadrol
    • Anavar
    • Deca Durabolin
    • Dianabol
    • Equipoise
    • Masteron
    • Oral Turinabol
    • Primobolan Depot
    • Sustanon 250
    • Testosterone
    • Trenbolone Acetate
    • Winstrol Depot
  • hGH & Peptides
    • CJC-1295
    • GHRP-6
    • hGH
    • hCG
    • IGF-1
    • Melanotan II
    • MGF
    • Mod GRF 1-29
    • TB-500
  • Anti-Estrogens
    • Arimidex
    • Aromasin
    • Clomid
    • Letrozole
    • Nolvadex
  • Fat Loss
    • AICAR
    • Albuterol
    • Clenbuterol
    • DNP
    • Ephedrine
    • T3
    • Telmisartan
You are here: Home / Steroid News / Syringe Containing Roger Clemens’ Blood Mixed with Anabolic Steroids

Syringe Containing Roger Clemens’ Blood Mixed with Anabolic Steroids

February 7, 2008 by Millard 12 Comments

Roger Clemens and alleged evidence of anabolic steroid use (including ampules, vials, syringes and blood) provided by Brian McNamee

Brian McNamee has turned over steroid syringes, vials and gauze pads to federal investigators that allegedly contain physical evidence supporting McNamee’s claim that he injected baseball player Roger Clemens with anabolic steroids and growth hormone. I didn’t see that coming.

It is simply bizarre that McNamee would have saved such items for seven years; I am sure there will be considerable speculation as to his motives. But the evidence could increase McNamee’s credibility if the physical evidence is consistent with his allegations of steroid use and growth hormone by Clemens. Steroid Nation explains how the physical evidence would support the allegations:

DNA matching could prove the Clemens connection.  When an injection is performed a small amount the the recipient’s blood is back-washed into the syringe.  That would allow DNA testing to verify Rocket-DNA; forensic analysis could also identify anabolic steroids.

While the physical evidence could corroborate McNamee’s statements, legal experts debate whether the evidence is admissible in court and the likelihood that such evidence would successfully be discredited by defense attorneys.

I also found it somewhat bizarre as well that the New York Times tried to suggest a similarity between the bloody syringe and Roger Clemens with the controversial retroactive testing of Lance Armstrong’s urine sample a few years ago:

The newest development in the Clemens case is similar to an issue that cyclist Lance Armstrong, long under suspicion of using performance-enhancing drugs, confronted in 2006. In that instance, the International Cycling Union discounted a reported link between Armstrong and the banned substance EPO because they concluded that testers had not followed proper procedures in retroactively testing Armstrong’s 1999 urine samples five years later.

Roger Clemens and alleged evidence of anabolic steroid use (including ampules, vials, syringes and blood) provided by Brian McNamee
Roger Clemens and alleged evidence of anabolic steroid use (including ampules, vials, syringes and blood) provided by Brian McNamee
Roger Clemens and anabolic steroids ampules (Organon Durateston)
Roger Clemens and anabolic steroids ampules (Organon Durateston)

About the author

Millard
Millard
MESO-Rx | Website

Millard writes about anabolic steroids and performance enhancing drugs and their use and impact in sport and society. He discusses the medical and non-medical uses of anabolic-androgenic steroids while advocating a harm reduction approach to steroid education.

Filed Under: Steroid News Tagged With: anabolic steroids, steroids

12 replies

Join the discussion →

Loading new replies...

Avatar of mr.nitro mr.nitro Feb 08, 2008 #1

why would their be blood in the syringe. sounds fishy to me. this isn't iv drugs we are dealing with

Reply Like

Avatar of MaxRep MaxRep Feb 09, 2008 #2

Blood "back washes" into the syringe after every steroid injection???

Not any injection I've ever given.

There may be a very small amount of blood that comes from the injection site after the injection but I can't ever remember seeing blood in the syringe after an injection. It's not like after the injection you pull back on the plunger for any reason.

And yes, that is ultra-bizarre that he would keep old syringes for 7 years... the guy's a freak.

MaxRep

Reply Like

click to expand...
Avatar of role model role model Feb 12, 2008 #3

Nobody would keep a syringe that long unless he had ulterior motives right from the very beginning.
Like blackmail for instance.

Reply Like

Avatar of LifeSize LifeSize Feb 12, 2008 #4

If it's true, you're correct.

Reply Like

Avatar of Millard Millard Feb 13, 2008 #5

i've seen it happen - well at least to the base of the needle (almost to the syringe). this would possibly happen when the needle is withdrawn slowly and passes through a vessel on the way out

Reply Like

Avatar of role model role model Feb 13, 2008 #6

Roger Clemens is either completely innocent or completely stupid.

There really isn't another option, not after Clemens has so aggressively defended himself against performance-enhancing drug charges that he has, perhaps unwittingly, raised the stakes to felony levels.

On Wednesday he and his former trainer and chief accuser, Brian McNamee, will testify in front of a Congressional committee. It's a moment we may just find out what Rocket Roger really is a man lashing out at false charges or a fool begging for a prison cell.

Clemens may be as guilty of doping as McNamee and a fair amount of common sense say. But he is, at the very least, acting like he is innocent, his lawyer all but daring federal agents to take him on.

Time will tell whether he regrets turning a sports controversy into a federal case.

Clemens' defense was slow to start, but now he's done everything imaginable to assert his innocence.

He's filed a defamation lawsuit. He's gone on "60 Minutes." He's held a news conference. He's taped a phone call. He's voluntarily testified under oath. He's welcomed his day in Washington. He's met privately with politicians. He's prepared statistical arguments. He's challenged the slightest of charges with evidence. He's had his lawyers make all sorts of crazy comments.

He's showed how you attempt to prove a negative, with a full-bore attack.

It certainly hasn't been perfect and it certainly hasn't proven anything, but it's nonetheless been impressive for its scope and intensity.

The problem for Clemens is that, despite his complaints, the court of public opinion was a far better place for an iconic athlete like himself to fight than a pseudo court of law (and probably eventually a real one), which is where he's pushed this.

For all the outrageous back and forth in this cat fight old beer cans, golf receipts, his wife in a bathing suit, allegedly enhanced by HGH Clemens was perfectly capable of muddying the water enough to win support. He has plenty of willing apologists from the press box to the box seats.

But they hardly matter now. Everything changed when he willingly swore to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help him God.

That's why his public relations and legal campaign is so compelling.

The natural reaction is to say Clemens might be innocent because he's acting innocent forcing all the cards on the table like he has nothing to hide. It's everything we haven't seen out of baseball players, who usually just complain how unfair the accusations are and do nothing.

This isn't Mark McGwire refusing to talk about the past and then hiding out in a gated community in California. This isn't Barry Bonds, defiant in some circles and silent in others.

But we also know that perjury is a slow-forming crime, a witness so backed into a corner, so concerned about the damage the truth can bring, that he just continues to lie even as the risks grow greater.

It is what we saw out of sprinter Marion Jones, who loudly and boldly proclaimed her innocence until she was broke, humiliated and en route to six months in the federal clink.

We also know McNamee has been equally aggressive, that he's a former cop who had little to gain by risking prison time for lying, and that his stories are so detailed or over the top they don't sound like lies (you don't just bring Clemens' wife into it out of nowhere). We also know he told the truth about Clemens' friend Andy Pettitte taking HGH.

The smart play for Clemens, assuming he is guilty, might have been to do what Pettitte did give an admission with qualifiers that will be accepted and excused by most.

But Clemens may not be capable of such clear thinking, no matter how carefully his high-powered legal and public relations team explained the consequences to him.

Or, indeed, he may be innocent.

Either way, here's Roger, aggressively attacking anyone in his way, with a series of brush-back pitches that sometimes seem ill-advised.

Was it really smart to have lawyer Rusty Hardin trash talk IRS special agent Jeff Novitzky, warning him not to show up Wednesday and claiming if he makes a move on Clemens, "Roger will eat his lunch"? That was enough for Rep. Henry Waxman to chastise Hardin for what could "be seen as an attempt to intimidate a federal law enforcement official."

Was it really a good idea to commission a statistical defense of his career resurgence, one that four Ivy League professors ripped to shreds in the New York Times, concluding that the numbers actually, "strongly hint that some unusual factors may have been at play in producing his excellent late-career statistics"?

And mostly, was it really a good idea to testify under oath about this, a move that could turn the scandal from embarrassing to criminal?

We'll see. At this point, the dice have been thrown, and someone is in a lot of trouble.

Clemens spent last week meeting individually with Congressional committee members, trying to use his star power, engaging personality and intimidating presence to gain favor with our easily dazzled and ethically challenged lawmakers. He did all but write campaign checks.

Unfortunately for Clemens, now that a perjury charge, either against McNamee or him, seems inevitable, winning over gushing lawmakers won't help much.

That's the chance he took in his all-out blitz; one more chip he pushed into the pile in his all-in gamble to prove his innocence.

If Clemens is clean, then he deserves credit for fighting this fight and proving it. If not, he'll have plenty of time in a prison cell to curse his reckless stupidity.

Reply Like

click to expand...
Avatar of LifeSize LifeSize Feb 13, 2008 #7

You guys watching? I've been keeping an eye on the testimony on CNN.. I'd hate to be in that seat.. : Best of luck to him.

Reply Like

Avatar of role model role model Feb 13, 2008 #8

I agree, I'm 90% sure he used but not 100% for sure.

Reply Like

Avatar of LifeSize LifeSize Feb 13, 2008 #9

He seemed like he was being 'sorta honest'.. Like he wants to defend himself, but not so much to seem like he used.. Then at the same time he is being pretty nice about the dude ratting him out.. Dunno.. On a lighter note, looks like it's going to be McCain vs Obama..

Reply Like

Avatar of role model role model Feb 13, 2008 #10

Andy Pettit said he used under oath so its hard to deny that one.

I hope McCain wins, cuz we don't know to much about Obama and his connections in the middle east. Maybe I'm just paranoid.

Reply Like

c cmotted Feb 14, 2008 #11

Doesn't our congress have better things to do than hold hearings (at the tax payer expense) about a person using steroids 7 years ago. They haven't done shit since being elected except argue over everything. Who gives a shit. Tell baseball to tighten up on testing and for god sake, congress, get on with running our country. WTF!!!!!!!

Reply Like

Avatar of role model role model Feb 14, 2008 #12

I still remember when Bill Romanowski said that over 50% of pro athletes use something at some time.

Reply Like

Join the full discussion at the MESO-Rx →

Primary Sidebar

Sponsors

Popular Articles

Ask Charles Staley training questions

Ask Charles Staley #8

Charles, My mother just turned 70 years old. She has been sedentary all of her life and seems to be paying for it now, exerting great effort just to get out of her recliner. Is it just too late to start figuring out … [Read More...] about Ask Charles Staley #8

androgen receptors

Androgen Action and the Androgen Receptor

Introductory Physiology and Pharmacology of Androgens Endogenous androgens are well known for their many functions in promoting sexual differentiation and the induction of the male phenotype. In the male, the two … [Read More...] about Androgen Action and the Androgen Receptor

hormone replacement therapy women

Introduction to Hormone Replacement Therapy Part 2 – Hormone Balancing for Women

Many post-menopausal women in the United States are on some sort of hormone replacement therapy program. However, I believe that hormone replacement therapy the way it is commonly done may cause more harm than good … [Read More...] about Introduction to Hormone Replacement Therapy Part 2 – Hormone Balancing for Women

anabolic steroids and aggression

Anabolic Steroids and Aggression, Part 2: Does the Evidence Support a Causal Inference?

Findings regarding the AAS use and aggression relationship are inconsistent and vary with the nature of the study and design. Although widely accepted as fact, a review finds little, if any, strong evidence for a … [Read More...] about Anabolic Steroids and Aggression, Part 2: Does the Evidence Support a Causal Inference?

Carl Lewis

A “BIZARRE” Look at Steroid Contradictions

The perfect way to open this article is to tell you about my conversations with the many university and college Health/Physical Education department heads I talked to in order to guest lecture at their respective … [Read More...] about A “BIZARRE” Look at Steroid Contradictions

Footer

MESO-Rx International

MESO-Rx articles are also available in the following languages:

Deutsch, English, Español, Français, Português, Русский

Questions? Comments?

Use the following link to send us an e-mail. We will respond as soon as we can.

Contact us.

Search

Copyright © 1997–2025 MESO-Rx. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.