No Iron for a month before cycle

Then your truly a pathological fool, who will and has NEVER admitted being wrong about substantive issues on this forum!

Jim remember the old axiom the pot calling the kettle black.....

If this is your version of an apology you leave a lot to be desired. I wonder what your bedside manners are like?
 
Here I'll use your verbiage "so you have been reading have you"
Wait on it,
Wait on it,
Wait on it,
It's coming lol!


Hey how about you locate ONE post you admitted to being WRONG about substantive matters while waiting DD or will this issue be the only one. No way even with the evidence ill post you will admit ZIPPO!
 
I'd never argue the moon is made of ch**se, I HATE ch**se Jim.
I'm waiting for an apology Jimbo....tick tock tick tock

Then your truly a pathological fool, who will and has NEVER admitted to being wrong about substantive issues on this forum!

WTF where did the : popcorn: emoji go?:(

smiley-face-popcorn.gif
 
HEY DOC LET'S SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT NOW. IS DE-NOVO LIPOGENESIS "A MYTH" IN HUMANS (your words) or HAVE YOU ONCE AGAIN ALTERED YOUR POSITION AND NOW CONTEND "IT'S NOT COMMON"!

GIVE ME A "STRAIGHT AND SERIOUS" ANSWER !

Shit you could even state here and now what factors alter the rate of NDL! I'm sure it's on the tip of your tongue right, IF you can keep up, lol
 
Jim when "doctors" make mistakes it's not a laughing matter. Patients deserve better than second class treatment

Nice try but this is an AAS forum where people like you spew bullshit that MUST be corrected, and not a doctors office.
 
HEY DOC LET'S SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT NOW. IS DE-NOVO LIPOGENESIS "A MYTH" IN HUMANS (your words) or HAVE YOU ONCE AGAIN ALTERED YOUR POSITION AND NOW CONTEND "IT'S NOT COMMON"!

GIVE ME A "STRAIGHT AND SERIOUS" ANSWER !

Shit you could even state here and now what factors alter the rate of NDL! I'm sure it's on the tip of your tongue right, IF you can keep up, lol

Jim setting the record straight involves you answering this question:

Did I say the conversion of fat to glucose is a myth?

It's hard to "keep up" with you Jim when your reading comprehension is so poor you make a 3rd grader look like a Nobel prize winner.
 
LET'S HEAR YOUR ANSWER DD IS DNL A MYTH OR AN UNCOMMON OCCURRENCE ! (Apparently you already realize Gluconeogenesis is NO MYTH so have abandoned that line of crap)

See I know what slippery fools like you will try to do, so before I post the articles
 
LET'S HEAR YOUR ANSWER DD IS DNL A MYTH OR AN UNCOMMON OCCURRENCE ! (Apparently you already realize Gluconeogenesis is NO MYTH so have abandoned that line of crap)

See I know what slippery fools like you will try to do, so before I post the articles

You're a fool bc you're still not able to point me to where I said GNG doesn't happen. It's ok Jim, I've helped with special ed classes, this is nothing new to me
 
Jim setting the record straight involves you answering this question:

Did I say the conversion of fat to glucose is a myth?

It's hard to "keep up" with you Jim when your reading comprehension is so poor you make a 3rd grader look like a Nobel prize winner.

Nope but what difference does that make, bc you did say glucose being stored as fat is a myth , did you not.

See that's how you changed the focus to comply with your own limited fund of knowledge.

Because you KNOW YOUR WRONG glucose BEING CONVERTED INTO FAT IS NO MYTH IS IT!
 
Why should I post evidence if your unable or unwilling to commit to a point of contention. Here one more time IS "GLUCOSE BEING STROED AS FAT" A MYTH.

See here is the problem, you done some reading and have located the evidence that statement is WRONG.

So until you are willing to commit to anything I'm not going to waste my time posting the same or similar evidence you have likely discovered.
 
Nope but what difference does that make, bc you did say glucose being stored as fat is a myth , did you not.

See that's how you changed the focus to comply with your own limited fund of knowledge.

Because you KNOW YOUR WRONG glucose BEING CONVERTED INTO FAT IS NO MYTH IS IT!

Is that it?!?! I waited all that time for this? I hope you're more generous with your sexual partners than this Jimbo.

And as to DNL being a myth, I addressed that with the other poster. It happens to a non-clinically significant degree in humans.

The limited fund of knowledge bug must have bit you Jim there's a big difference between converting fat to glucose and storing glucose as fat. Only an idiot, excuse me, someone with a limited fund of knowledge would think they're the same.
 
Why should I post evidence if your unable or unwilling to commit to a point of contention. Here one more time IS "GLUCOSE BEING STROED AS FAT" A MYTH.

See here is the problem, you done some reading and have located the evidence that statement is WRONG.

So until you are willing to commit to anything I'm not going to waste my time posting the same or similar evidence you have likely discovered.

You're wasting enough time posting your nonsense already Jim. That excuse won't cut it
 
Most people understand that's your way of saying the conversion of glucose into fat occurs in HUMANS and is in fact NO MYTH! However if you fell it necessary to justify an erroneous initial reply by correcting it thru select qualifiers to save face, rather than simply admit YOU WERE WRONG, I'm not surprised.

Now if you choose, we can discuss under what set of circumstances the conversion of glucose into fat becomes QUITE RELEVANT. They are called provisions or conditions DD try using them more frequently in the future, OR you will BE WRONG AGAIN.
 
THE STORAGE OF GLUCOSE AS FAT IS LAREGLY A MYTH BC IT IS BASED ON RAT NOT HUMAN MODELS AND THEY OROCESS CARBOHYDRATES DIFFERENTLY THAN HUMANS DO. IN HUMANS, DE NOVO LIPOGENESIS IS NOT A COMMIN OCCURENCE AKA THE STORAGE OF GLUCOSE INTO FAT OR THE SYNTHESIS OF OF FATTY ACIDS FROM DIETARY CARBOHYDRATES OR THE ENZYMATIC PROCESS FOR CONVERTING DIETARY CARBOHYDRATES INTO FAT IN HUMANS IS LAREGLY A MYTH.



Every time you get backed into a corner, your resort to personal attacks. Where's your evidence? All I've seen is you parroting the words of others and putting up a few links to Lyle's blog. Unfortunately, as much as I like Lyle, his OPINION is NOT evidence.

If you have evidence, post it. If not, give it a rest and admit you're wrong.
 
You're wasting enough time posting your nonsense already Jim. That excuse won't cut it

Oh I suspected that would be the case from the beginning bc I'm dealing with someone who allows others to think for him rather than posting and searching for his own supportive data.

Shit you still won't admit lipogenesis from glucose occurs in humans and if you haven't located evidence to that effect, either you can't read, are blind or delusional.

But Ill still post the evidence DD for others on this forum so they can reach their own conclusions rather you OR me or LYLE McDonald who doesn't even have an advanced degree! (Fact is I've located nothing that shows he even has an undergraduate degree)

His claim to fame, being a very convincing speaker to those who are often misinformed and selling books as a consequence!
 
Last edited:
Glucose being stored as fat is a myth based on that models and glucose infusion models. Rats process carbs very differently from humans and we don't do IVs of glucose either.

This is your original claim. You can drop the "fat into glucose" deflection - it was obviously a typo. The fact that you're holding on to it for dear life isn't surprising - it's what you do when you're cornered.

Let's see if you can put your money where your mouth is and back up your empty words for once. Post your evidence!
 
Most people understand that's your way of saying the conversion of glucose into fat occurs in HUMANS and is in fact NO MYTH! However if you fell it necessary to justify an erroneous initial reply by correcting it thru select qualifiers to save face, rather than simply admit YOU WERE WRONG, I'm not surprised.

Now if you choose, we can discuss under what set of circumstances the conversion of glucose into fat becomes QUITE RELEVANT. They are called provisions or conditions DD try using them more frequently in the future, OR you will BE WRONG AGAIN.

Jim I'm still waiting to admit you were wrong qualifiers or not. However if you feel it necessary to justify your wrong initial reply with tomfoolery to save face, rather than simply admit you were wrong, I'm not surprised. Jim if a self purported doctor was wrong about this, I, a mere mortal, being wrong is the least of my worries. My main worry would be where these doctors are getting their education from.
 
Back
Top