The study was done on sedentary overweight individuals. I doubt they actually lost any fat rather they gained more “lbm” which skews the ratio of muscle/fat %. Nice try. I proof read that one years before it was even public.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
If all pros use higher test why you claim low test is better ?
- Thread starter MONSTRO1977
- Start date
PeterBond
Member
Both my reply, as well as the paper, clearly talk about an inverse correlation between testosterone levels and change in fat mass. Not change in fat mass %. Moreover, while technically fulfilling the criteria for being overweight, as the average BMI was 25 kg/m2 in the 50, 125, 300 and 600 mg groups, so are bodybuilders. Their fat percentages were 15, 16, 14, and 14 %, respectively, in these groups. Finally, sedentary individuals are even more prone to gaining weight than active individuals. As such, this isn't really helping your argument. (Note that the study nowhere mentions that these individuals were sedentary. They were only asked to not undertake strength training or moderate-to-heavy endurance exercise during the study.)
Also, feel free to share any publication which came to findings opposite to this one.
Last edited:
PeterBond
Member
Currently working on a second edition. Although it will probably take a couple of years before it's done. Updating and revising some of the existing sections, but mostly adding new stuff.
I'm 100% certain its an MIT "annoyance bot" top of the line test BETA. It's sole purpose is to aggravate. Its a good one too. You can't even ban that it will just resurface in different forms... Best to just call it a BOT for the sake of newcomers.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8pVZ5hTGJQ&list=PLam8Qe7irsYQVRpynRi1-C-zX480C3fjR&index=84
You "proof read it before it was public"? It was published in 2001. You indicate your age as 30 years old. You must have been a prodigy to review shit like that in your early childhood. Retard.
Youngrobert1
New Member
Guys I just realized with his I'm from beverly hills offended post hes playing with us. He cant be that dumb. He legitimately trolled. Thats the only sense I can make out of this. And the op is a shill. For an ifbb pro he needs to do diet and prep plans and stop trying to start megadose threads in hopes we'll ask where can we get these g2g steroids you take so much of.
Forthewin1123
Member
Yes we know those compounds are stronger bit they cant be ran without test.. and.depend9ng on dose and the individual person.. 250 test is usually not enough.. you get deca dick anxiety low libido and so on..
Last edited:
Forthewin1123
Member
@Exister0 go run 350 npp and 250 tren ace log it and in 4 weeks add 250 test prop.. log it
.and at 8 weeks raise.test.to 500 test prop.. log it.. let's see how.you feel in each phase and how much you gain in each phase..
On paper your theory makes sense.. But in the human body alot more things are effected then just muscle.. pros have tried everything possible to get an edge on.their competitors . If low test was better we would have already read tons of.cycle logs and so on..
Have you yourself ran a.cycle with low test other then low test and primo?
.and at 8 weeks raise.test.to 500 test prop.. log it.. let's see how.you feel in each phase and how much you gain in each phase..
On paper your theory makes sense.. But in the human body alot more things are effected then just muscle.. pros have tried everything possible to get an edge on.their competitors . If low test was better we would have already read tons of.cycle logs and so on..
Have you yourself ran a.cycle with low test other then low test and primo?
GuerillaPete
Member
Why does the page load only half way? Does this site require to be logged to see full content?
PeterBond
Member
It's open access, should work. But journal sites usually suck on mobile devices. Any chance you're trying to access it on your phone?
GuerillaPete
Member
Yes i usually use the phone but thanks for the heads up gonna read up on it on pc.
GuerillaPete
Member
Not to ride the dudes dick or anything but Steve is a long time coach with bloodwork done on hundreds of clients on cycle at different dosages so his knowledge for me is as good as any study out there.
I don’t think the bloodwork is real.
Why what makes you doubt that?
Just feel like it isn’t
GuerillaPete
Member
Good for you buddy in this day and age is good to question everything but i dont think we are talking about the same thing here.
Thanks for taking over, gents.
Not in my case brother.
So you just get a sick thrill out of generating negative attention?
You already got caught in a lie earlier: “I reviewed that study even before it was published.” When if that was the case you would have been 5 years old.
You clearly don’t know shit about any of this. Training. Diet. Drugs. Nothing.
And you throw out the ridiculous “I’m 6’3” and 140 pounds”.
You’re just a troll. Simple as that. You’re fucked up. Get a life. Do something positive and quit being such a piece of shit.
Crap, I’m sure you’re jerking off to this post right now. Fuck it. Have a few more good tugs you sick dumb fuck.
Bumpygooch
Member
Affordable as well, and, an easy read despite the subject matter.
