What happened to READALOT?

[SkankHunt]

Oh yeah, your behavior definitely didnt get you banned

Find me a post of me referencing "Scruf".

Oh yeah, I really needed him.

Thread 'Cridi887's/Rido's Lab Testing'

Mar 31, 2023

Goodlyfe TEST U GSO.


Modvigil in my store


Vidalista

• Rido
• Replies: 59
• Forum: Analytical Lab Testing

• 
• 

I also got ideas from @SkankHunt for indian pharma when he had a shop. There is so much evidence here for safe sources to buy from. I dont need one solo user that started posting after I have(I mean no disrespect to @scruff)


Commitment to Meso members? I have paid back this community by sharing tests of Raw's, Semaglutide, Tirzepatide, and HGH with no money to be made by posting it here.

Also, if I wanted to really make money from Oils I brewed, I would have started as a shop where people already trusted me.

I can do whatever I want with my money. Atleast I didnt repeat how spend XYZ in the name of harm reduction over and over again asking for people to love me.

do you want to buy some primo? I got it lab tested.

 

[readalot]

He said there were reasons for him not being given it or something.
I am not interested in that.

But I would have thought that you would have achieved that status at some point, before your ban.
You had posted a lot of good info.
I assumed you got banned and it was taken away ( like for Narta) but no

Frankly, it would only matter for the few people that are really useful here, you being one.

Here's some discussion (see below that post for Millard's feedback)...

R

Post in thread 'New MESO-Rx member ranking system'

Oct 13, 2023

My reaction score is 74 with 184 messages. Is the harm reduction/value creation in each post somehow assessed via the information content and scientific validity in that post? Or is each post scored solely on reactions received?

At this rate I will need to live to 697 (+/- 156) years old to attain guru status (lol) if my extrapolation model is accurate. But there is always a risk with extrapolation without the appropriate constitutive framework to help inform outside the existing data domain.

Has anyone compared high achieving members' reaction scores over time with the old vs...

• readalot

I have no quantitative info on the algorithm. Thanks for your feedback.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

@Ghoul please respond about your accusation ? Or is this gonna be like ignoring @Zebedee ?

I guess he can't even admit he was wrong.

"How to admit being wrong?" On chat GPT would be a solid start.

 

[readalot]

Less about what source you’d use I mean what the threshold or what needs to be true for you to go to the dark side of ugl.

At some point everyone who does it has to assume the risk, right?

I just try to minimize surprises but that's just me.

Good question. I am sorry I can't answer in more detail.

 

[iris]

Less about what source you’d use I mean what the threshold or what needs to be true for you to go to the dark side of ugl.

Someone on the testing thread is saying that Indian pct vendors should provide up to date tests of some of the products they sell.

What do you think about that?

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

Someone on the testing thread is saying that Indian pct vendors should provide up to date tests of some of the products they sell.

What do you think about that?

They don't need to.

Its pharma there, well regulated. Dont buy UGL Indian.


You know what they do? Alll of them give 120 credit per item for testing.


People need to test their shit.

 

[iris]

They don't need to.

Its pharma there, well regulated. Dont buy UGL Indian.


You know what they do? Alll of them give 120 credit per item for testing.


People need to test their shit.

On the pct thread there was a post about t3 or t4 (don't remember which one) from a brand they sell that tested badly, iirc.
I have not followed so idk how that ended.
Maybe a manufacturing error?

Great someone tested that.
A lot of people use that stuff.
A brilliant example of testing and practical harm reduction that is, as you say, available for everyone to do.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

On the pct thread there was a post about t3 or t4 (don't remember which one) from a brand they sell that tested badly, iirc.
I have not followed so idk how that ended.
Maybe a manufacturing error?

Great someone tested that.
A lot of people use that stuff.
A brilliant example of testing and practical harm reduction that is, as you say, available for everyone to do.

It's an Indian UGL .

That was evolve, not a pharma company. People need to research what they are purchasing.

 

[iris]

It's an Indian UGL .

That was evolve, not a pharma company. People need to research what they are purchasing.

Most people buy it as a pharma product because of what those vendors sell/where they get it from.
Chilton had it too, although I don't remember how he listed it on his site.
I learnt here it was ugl, when someone posted about it, otherwise I would have assumed the same.

 

[musclesiege]

Most people buy it as a pharma product because of what those vendors sell/where they get it from.
Chilton had it too, although I don't remember how he listed it on his site.
I learnt here it was ugl, when someone posted about it, otherwise I would have assumed the same.

Yeah it’s tricky. Space is correct and has a lot of experience with it. UGL India is hit garbage but pharma grade is obviously great you just need to make sure you research that vendor to make sure it’s the latter. If UGL is be hard pressed to trust it even if it had testing as they are known for under dosing or giving a different product all together.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

Most people buy it as a pharma product because of what those vendors sell/where they get it from.
Chilton had it too, although I don't remember how he listed it on his site.
I learnt here it was ugl, when someone posted about it, otherwise I would have assumed the same.

Customers can research the brand they offer.

Evolve, Matrix, (Shree can be iffy). these are the ones to watch out for.

there are 1000+ products from those companies. This is where it would be nice for everything to be tested, but its not realistic.


These are regulated by Indian pharma. If someone can't Google the brands, they shouldn't be buying stuff...

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

I guess he can't even admit he was wrong.

"How to admit being wrong?" On chat GPT would be a solid start.

@Ghoul

Last attempt to address this, coward

You want to make accusations against me?


You are so obsessed with AI functions/google you lost the ability to generate a logical thought. Or even admit fault.

 

[readalot]

7 days of 1.5 IU/day Serostim complete. Raised to 1.8 IU/day last night. I may wait till 2 IU/day until I get IGF-1 test.

So far no change in BP or RHR.

Was staying pretty constant at 280 mg/week Test C over last 8 weeks. May drop that down some before introducing new stuff.

 

[musclesiege]

7 days of 1.5 IU/day Serostim complete. Raised to 1.8 IU/day last night. I may wait till 2 IU/day until I get IGF-1 test.

So far no change in BP or RHR.

Was staying pretty constant at 280 mg/week Test C over last 8 weeks. May drop that down some before introducing new stuff.

Why the 0.2-0.3 increments? Good to establish a base and slowly go up but those increments seem random vs 0.5 for example. Are you concerned with igf being too high or hoping such small increments may help you avoid CTS?

 

[readalot]

Why the 0.2-0.3 increments? Good to establish a base and slowly go up but those increments seem random vs 0.5 for example. Are you concerned with igf being too high or hoping such small increments may help you avoid CTS?

Random, nah. Reconstituted a 6 mg vial with 2 ml of bac water...9 IU/ml. Started at ~0.17 ml/day (1.5 IU/d) and so just bumped to 0.2 ml/day (1.8 IU/day). Just taking it slow to ensure no surprises on RHR or BP. 1.5 to 1.8 IU/day within the recommended starting dose as per manufacturer recommendation (1.3 to 1.8).

Appreciate you asking.

 

[readalot]

Absolutely no bubbles, foam with Serostim. Proper reconstitution technique. Immediately dissolves crystal clear whether using room temp or refrigerated bac water from Hospira.

Next week bumping up to 2 IU/d. No site reactions after injection. No BP or RHR elevations yet.

 

[Sicsemptyran]

Absolutely no bubbles, foam with Serostim. Proper reconstitution technique. Immediately dissolves crystal clear whether using room temp or refrigerated bac water from Hospira.

Next week bumping up to 2 IU/d. No site reactions after injection. No BP or RHR elevations yet.

Had meant to ask how this had been going for you. Given by what I can infer about you, I've assumed you're fairly on top of your health and would be surprised if you started running into many sides at the lower doses.

I've noticed quite a correlation between those who are generally unhealthy (usually fat) and side effects to things.

 

[readalot]

Coming to tail end of week 3 (2 IU/d). No changes to RHR, BP. No numbness or bloating. Will hold at 2 IU/day and get blood work. Dropped Test Cyp down to 100 mg/week last week to assess a "TRT" baseline on IGF-1.

 

[readalot]

Stats...

R

Post in thread 'RHR and correlation to PED dosages.. My Experience'

Feb 25, 2025

What's your protocol?

Week 1: 1.5 IU/day bedtime
Week 2: 2 IU/day bedtime

Just started week 3.
Week 3: 2 IU/day bedtime.

All administered IM.

Will pull IGF-1 test at 2 IU/day soon.

Sleep score is trash so GH hasn't affected it much. Typically 77/100 (+/- 2).

BP 125/70 (+/- 3)
RHR 58 (+/- 2)

Just took Test Cyp down from 280 mg/week to 125 as I can't even do a science experiment properly and have to change at least 2 DOF every time.

• readalot

• 

 

[Sicsemptyran]

The demon on your shoulder telling you to show us what IGF looks like on a vial of sero a day