Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Chris is not here anymore you can find him at.roro said:Chris,
When you say low, how low? lower than the "norms" or low normal?
Iv'e been checked twice at 13.8 and 17 nmol/l
chris_az said:Dear Doctor J and interested parties,
In the UK I have noticed a strong correlation between fellow
patient's poor response to testosterone and low SHBG.
The widely held belief is that high not low SHBG is a problem.
>From my understanding this is because SHBG is of course the binding
protein (binding 98% of testosterone in the typical male), binding
with greater affinity to testosterone than to E2, therefore high
SHBG adversely affects the testosterone to E2 ratio.
Of course high SHBG can be a problem, but I believe it is more than
a coincidence that many, many men who respond poorly to TRT have low
SHBG, I believe that this too is a problem.
>From what I can see the logic goes that low SHBG will result in a
higher level of free testosterone as less is bound and that this can
only be a good thing. However I think that the problem here is that
SHBG is only being viewed in relation to testosterone.
Low SHBG will also cause an increase in free E2.
Now if this is viewed in the context of testosterone it can be said
that the rise in free testosterone is greater than the rise in free
E2 meaning low SHBG is not a problem because of the binding
affinities.
But like I said this is if SHBG and E2 are viewed in the context of
testosterone. But high E2 in itself is surely likely to cause its
own problems.
I believe those with low SHBG are suffering from high E2, more
specifically high free E2 on TRT and that that is the reason for
poor response to TRT.
My thoughts are merely that, I have no prove whatsoever just a hunch.
Symptomatically those with low SHBG on TRT tend to develop
gynecomastia and see no improvement, in fact sometimes a decrease in
libido on commencement of TRT.
Serum E2 is usually toward the top of the range with no test
available for free E2.
Use of A.Is and anti estrogens seem to have had little benefit to
such men, having had very mixed results.
I am one of these men.
My SHBG is 10nmol/l with a range of 13-75nmol/l.
P.S
There maybe another mechanism of action and my theory maybe wrong, it could be that those with low SHBG share an underlying condition that relates to poor response to TRT, but again this is speculating.
Whatever the mechanism, men with low SHBG who are supposedly those that will do best on TRT are paradoxically those who seem to be fairing the worst.
I would very much like to get to the bottom of why this is. I feel by doing so and finding an answer/reason for this may perhaps pave the way to good health via a TRT protocol which would more appropriate for me and men like me.
A penny for your thoughts?
Regards,
Chris
marianco said:TRT with Low SHBG is not simple to do because there are many other complicating factors such as:
1. SHBG is reduced further by the increase in testosterone.
2. Insulin resistance. Low SHBG is one sign of insulin resistance/diabetes. Insulin resistance can cause other hormone imbalances and impair nerve signal transmission.
3. Hypothyroidism. Low SHBG may be a sign of inadequate thyroid hormone levels. Hypothyroidism is often present clinically though the lab tests are normal.
4. The duration action of testosterone is shortened by low SHBG - making one prone to a roller coaster experiences.
5. Testosterone can reduce thyroid hormone activity - resulting in anxiety or depressive symptoms depending on the severity of the reduction. There are multiple mechanisms of action which can cause this.
6. Low SHBG may result in high free Testosterone. High Free testosterone is not necessarily good. For example, if estradiol levels and progesterone levels are normal, the high free testosterone may result in high blood pressure. Testosterone can either lower or raise blood pressure depending on its relationship to the other hormones.
7. etc.
Testosterone functions depend on its relationship with other hormones, neurotransmitters, and cytokines - these all are chemical messengers in the body. Low SHBG complicates matters but is not an unsolvable problem in most people.
Axl said:Marianco,
I've have had low SHBG all my life, before AND after TRT.
Here are my two latets labs values, always taken right before my next shot.
april 2006 - august 2006 - (Ref Range)
TSH 0,8 mIU/L - ? (0,3 - 4,0)
FT3 4,8 pmol/L - ? (2,6 - 5,7)
Total T 890 ng/dl - 635 (280 - 1100)
Free T 292,8 pg/ml - 199 (50 - 280)
SHBG 9 nmol/L - 10 (13 - 71)
How can I get my SHBG up? What should be my aim here? Around 30 nmol/L?
I think HaN said he is on to a solution, but I'm you'll be more likely to get a sales pitch than a direct answer from him these days.
Great post Marianco!
I can understand what you are saying, SHBG comes in second.
I don't always agree with you, and I will take my specific case as an example to explain why. I truly believe that some HRT patients can benifit from treating SHBG.
I will try to explain this. Before TRT, I had very low T, low free T, low E2, low DHT and extremely low SHBG. On top of that, I had osteopenia, caused by overall low hormonal levels, muscle waisting, lack of energy and I got stuck in Tanner stage 4 or 5 with mild pseudo-gynecomastia and no facial hair.
Now, here comes the "chicken or the egg" question:
are my overall hormones low because I have a low SHBG
OR
do I have low SHBG because I have low overall hormones?
Most people say it is the latter: "one has low SHBG because of low overall hormones".
BUT: if this was correct, increasing my overall hormones with TRT, SHOULD have increased SHBG. However: this has never happened.
So, isn't it better to try to increase SHBG (eg by increasing Thyroid levels or by stimulating the liver), this way I could have naturally higher hormone levels, without the need of testosterone injections. Antoher great benefit would be the fact that by increasing SHBG, I would reduce the risk of insuline resistence and developing diabetes. Even my osteopenia would improve because of higher overall average hormone levels.
How come the medical community hasn't figured this out yet? I think this can be the answer to a lot of problems for a lot of HRT patients with low SHBG.
The likliest culprit is excess insulin. The imbalance is not the usual form that would be easily detected by a fasting serum insulin/glucose test. You'd need an euglycemic clamp to make the determination. Metformin or similar would then be your solution. If you aren't willing to aggressively test your insulin response and markers of proper liver function, you will spin your wheels indefinately. Low SHBG is not something that will be cured by taking hormones. It is an entirely different issue that needs to be fixed before hormones can ever be regulated.
Axl,
Did you read my last post at all? Here it is again:
So, yes, there IS a very high correlation between insulin resistance and low SHBG. I'm offended and surprised that it took 20+ posts in this thread for this fact to be acknowledged, especially since it is one of the very first things that a simple Google search will reveal.
Like I said, testing for insulin resistance is the first step you must take in treating low SHBG. However, beware that it may not be so simple. In my case, I have passed blood related insulin tests with flying colors. I'm currently looking into options for more specialized tests, including an euglycemic clamp.
Offended? come on, isnt this site about knuckleheads like me. I am learning a lit of new stuff right now, so as a stubborn fool, I have to ask some of you to pound it into my head. I too saw your post. Axl was just the last one to speak on it. At least as I read in my mind. All this info is great.
Axl, My Estradiol is kinda what has started me on this final quest for metabolic perfection. A recent test revealed that I was about 114 on the scale you referred to. Others tell me that is not good enough and I need to get an "ultra sensative E2 test". It apparently has a scale of 20-29 for correct ranges, at least to my knowledge so far. Keep in mind though that was after 10 weeks of supping test cyp 150-200mgs/wk. So it may be where expected. Total and free test not in yet so I am not sure how the T/E ration stacks up.
Regarding blood sugar being "high". I just cant be sure here. I have run about 125 from the age of 20-36. A stress test ( the one where you drink the sugar and see how your body deals with it reveals healthy). While I may run 125 very easily, it also seems to "check up" there as well. I was 99 the other day when having blood work. this was not fasting, however, i had not eaten very much and much earlier. Further note is that I do have a strong affinity for simple sugars and get edgy without, until any diet changes have been in force for at least a month. . My doctor gave me something called Glumetza. I think it may also be referred to as "glucophage". Not sure about spelling. He does not think I am even a full blown type II diabetic yet, however, he thought this might help to control some blood sugar and prevent so much fat from sticking to my body when I eat. They are 500mg extended release. QUESTION, if my insuline levels are improper, will this be the right step in direction to prove of disprove SHBG. With time on this I should see an increase in SHBG, right??
So, I am thinking it looks like i am addressing blood sugar first. Maybe once that is stabilized at whatever these meds do I can again recheck thyroid...
Anyone else feel free to chime in if you think I am not on the right page...![]()
Glumetza
GLUMETZA (metformin hydrochloride extended release tablets) is indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
-> Your doc is already giving you metformin. See James's post: he also mentioned methformin as step 1 to tackle Insuline resistance issues. So your doc is on the right track. The abdominal fat sticking to your body is partly due to this. The main reason, however, is you are having the wrong diet and not enough exercise. Please do read the attachments I've posted in this thread: they are 100% suited for you.
And yes, you need the ultra sensitive test when testing E2. The high E2 could be due to the messing about with testosterone.
Here is what I would do. Stop messing around with T, clean up your diet and exercise scheme, take a baseline total T and E2 value, correct E2 if necessary by titrating 1/4 of a tablet of Arimidex every 3 days, remeasure E2 and total T, and adjust E2 until you are in the ref range. Only at this point I would add Testosterone (only if you are low on total T, at replacement dosages). Remeasure and adjust. Have your fat% measured by bio impedance or fat callipers. Set your goals: you should be as low on fat as possible to avoid future issues with diabetes mellitus (again: read the 2 pdf's I've posted in this thread)!!
Oh yeah... and stop "popping whoppers"! ;-)
If others think I'm wrong, please feel free to correct me. I'm certainly not a doc and I'm not pretending to be knowledgeable on this subject. I'm still looking for answers myself and I'm happy to share my findings woth others ...just trying to help out BBC3 here...
BBC, I think you've got it wrong: the effectiveness of the "diabetes treatment" is not measured by how much your SHGB is lowered (I don't understand where you get this from??), but is measured by how much your overall blood glucose levels and insuline levels have dropped. By decreasing circulating insuline levels, your SHBG will probably rise slightly.I cant say that I will cut back the test below 150-200 mgs/wk as that was the amount I had been on for 10 weeks at that last lab date. I would like to keep that previous scenario as a baseline to determine the effectiveness of the diabetes treatment in lowering SHBG. Regarding the E2 it is obvious I need the other test, so without any gynosign, I am going to relax on that issue till the results are in. Regarding the body fat, its funny because belly fat was exactly the area of body fat he spoke of. I used to never have a problem there. I always put everything on even. Regarding the Woppers, they are hard to stop poppin. It is a good thing the BK by my house sucks. I appreciate all your input. Thanks.
