International HGH price comparison

[MyNameIsJeff]

I will periodically update the table. So please share updates to pricing, current promos, links to test results, etc., in this thread.

 

[readalot]

RESPECT!!

Was thinking of doing a dashboard like this for the enhanced testing acceptance with vendors.

 

[unrest]

Maybe lab tests can be added as well.

 

[readalot]

@GenericAsia
@TheLobster

Look above. Opportunity is staring you right in the face? Do I have to buy the endotoxin tests for you guys?

Be the change. Worst case there's nothing of note and you guys get the credit. I've got some results on the way thanks to Brother @Sampei.

Get in on the ground floor. First mover advantage.

 

[Avies48]

@GenericAsia
@TheLobster

Look above. Opportunity is staring you right in the face? Do I have to buy the endotoxin tests for you guys?

Be the change. Worst case there's nothing of note and you guys get the credit. I've got some results on the way thanks to Brother @Sampei.

Get in on the ground floor. First mover advantage.

Greeat there go the affordable prices… jkjk

 

[readalot]

Greeat there go the affordable prices… jkjk

I don't think 120 USD for each of them is going to affect their bottom line too much .
Good business practice.

I, on the other hand, don't get a revenue stream on my recent "investment". Maybe I'll get some properly tested gear though at some point.

 

[MyNameIsJeff]

Since I apparently did not have anything better to do tonight. I added more sources and also the latest testing results for each product.

 

[MyNameIsJeff]

Just one more addition, bear with me here. I now adjust the number of IU for quality (as measured by purity and dimer). (Quality-adjusted IU / nominal IU) is a multiplier that equals 1 if the purity is 100% and the dimer 0%. The lower the purity and the higher the dimer of a product, the lower the multiplier will be. This multiplier is then applied to the nominal number of IU in the product to get to the number of quality-adjusted IU. Which is used as the basis for the cost comparison in the last column.

 

[AlexDavis43]

I will periodically update the table. So please share updates to pricing, current promos, links to test results, etc., in this thread.

Thanks for doing this! Could add some pharma GH for perspective on price per IU (excluding shipping).

Genotropin:
36 IU for $200 from BG
$195 from TP
$155 from Lobster
5 x 36 IU for $720 from Lobster

Cinnatropin:
30 IU for $72 from TP
$65 from Devon

 

[MyNameIsJeff]

5 x 36 IU for $720 from Lobster

This one is included in the latest version. The other ones I will add soon.

 

[AlexDavis43]

This one is included in the latest version. The other ones I will add soon.

It's one of the best prices per IU for pharma GH. Not sure how long that deal will last.

 

[TheMoto]

Nice, Thanks for taking the time to do this.

 

[DugPrime]

we need a china lab that comes from nowhere and beat QSC prices

 

[readalot]

Race to the bottom. No thanks.

 

[MyNameIsJeff]

 

[strangegenericguy]

Shipping to EU from qsc is 20? You sure? I think 60

 

[Joker21]

Shipping to EU from qsc is 20? You sure? I think 60

To countries that do not require Special Line, shipping starts at $20 and increases with the weight of the parcel.

 

[MyNameIsJeff]

Added a variable that describes the number of months since the last lab test. And added a penalty for infrequent lab testing in the quality-adjustment.

Rationale is as follows: (1) there is more uncertainty about the quality of the product when testing is infrequent. (2) if the last lab test is a long time ago, then this could indicate that the batch being sold has been in storage for longer, thus increasing the expected degradation. In any case, the penalty is relatively small, and due to the polynomial, only really kicks in when it has been a long time since the last test.

Finally, I added color coding to the quality parameters.

 

[readalot]

Added a variable that describes the number of months since the last lab test. And added a penalty for infrequent lab testing in the quality-adjustment.

Rationale is as follows: (1) there is more uncertainty about the quality of the product when testing is infrequent. (2) if the last lab test is a long time ago, then this could indicate that the batch being sold has been in storage for longer, thus increasing the expected degradation. In any case, the penalty is relatively small, and due to the polynomial, only really kicks in when it has been a long time since the last test.

Finally, I added color coding to the quality parameters.

View attachment 301233

 

[Sampei]

Since I apparently did not have anything better to do tonight. I added more sources and also the latest testing results for each product.

View attachment 301138

Qsc shipping is higher, you should add the average between low cost shipping and EU special lines especially because no one just buy 1-2 Kits for that prices