International HGH price comparison

@GenericAsia
@TheLobster

Look above. Opportunity is staring you right in the face? Do I have to buy the endotoxin tests for you guys?

Be the change. Worst case there's nothing of note and you guys get the credit. I've got some results on the way thanks to Brother @Sampei.

Get in on the ground floor. First mover advantage.

Greeat there go the affordable prices… jkjk
 
Just one more addition, bear with me here. I now adjust the number of IU for quality (as measured by purity and dimer). (Quality-adjusted IU / nominal IU) is a multiplier that equals 1 if the purity is 100% and the dimer 0%. The lower the purity and the higher the dimer of a product, the lower the multiplier will be. This multiplier is then applied to the nominal number of IU in the product to get to the number of quality-adjusted IU. Which is used as the basis for the cost comparison in the last column.

quality-adjusted comp.webp
 
I will periodically update the table. So please share updates to pricing, current promos, links to test results, etc., in this thread.

Thanks for doing this! Could add some pharma GH for perspective on price per IU (excluding shipping).

Genotropin:
36 IU for $200 from BG
$195 from TP
$155 from Lobster
5 x 36 IU for $720 from Lobster

Cinnatropin:
30 IU for $72 from TP
$65 from Devon
 
Added a variable that describes the number of months since the last lab test. And added a penalty for infrequent lab testing in the quality-adjustment.

Rationale is as follows: (1) there is more uncertainty about the quality of the product when testing is infrequent. (2) if the last lab test is a long time ago, then this could indicate that the batch being sold has been in storage for longer, thus increasing the expected degradation. In any case, the penalty is relatively small, and due to the polynomial, only really kicks in when it has been a long time since the last test.

Finally, I added color coding to the quality parameters.

GH ranking 3Nov24.webp
 
Added a variable that describes the number of months since the last lab test. And added a penalty for infrequent lab testing in the quality-adjustment.

Rationale is as follows: (1) there is more uncertainty about the quality of the product when testing is infrequent. (2) if the last lab test is a long time ago, then this could indicate that the batch being sold has been in storage for longer, thus increasing the expected degradation. In any case, the penalty is relatively small, and due to the polynomial, only really kicks in when it has been a long time since the last test.

Finally, I added color coding to the quality parameters.

View attachment 301233

Vince Mcmahon Wwe GIF
 

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top