Thanks. Someone will finally want to test it after you have thrown it out. Nature of the beast here.Apologies. Just seeing this. I tend to go on a little digital detox on the weekends.
It is still available.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks. Someone will finally want to test it after you have thrown it out. Nature of the beast here.Apologies. Just seeing this. I tend to go on a little digital detox on the weekends.
It is still available.
We reviewed spectra together against the NIST spectra. AutoID appears correct for the plastic-associated peak that was also flagged in the TRE400 samples.MCT oil does not turn up as MCT oil in GCMS.
Alot of products in GCMS are not so straight forward to interpret.
Jano requested i send in a plastic (polystyrene) sample (he mentioned in his thread when i asked about it) and i so just did as he requested.
Yes the spectra is not present in all the other vendor testing we previously did.
Only vials suspected thus far are from a single vendor.
I have emailed Jano to see how we can move from suspected->confirmed, but if it's too much work I'll just move on and call it a day. At this point i've already invested a little too much more time than i would have liked, for gear from a vendor i've decided not to use going forward.
Thanks for the clarificationMCT oil does not turn up as MCT oil in GCMS.
Alot of products in GCMS are not so straight forward to interpret.
Jano requested i send in a plastic (polystyrene) sample (he mentioned in his thread when i asked about it) and i so just did as he requested.
Yes the spectra is not present in all the other vendor testing we previously did.
Only vials suspected thus far are from a single vendor.
I have emailed Jano to see how we can move from suspected->confirmed, but if it's too much work I'll just move on and call it a day. At this point i've already invested a little too much more time than i would have liked, for gear from a vendor i've decided not to use going forward.
antioxidant or anti-yellowing additive that leached from the polystyrene.We reviewed spectra together against the NIST spectra. AutoID appears correct for the plastic-associated peak that was also flagged in the TRE400 samples.
GPC. See my edits. Seriously, follow the advice you gave me. Most here dont give a shit. Go live your life. Dont waste anymore of your time.
i do!!!!Most here dont give a shit
I know you do and I sincerely appreciate it.i do!!!!
hello.but in the term "MCT BB BA", what do the "BB" and the "BA" stand for? Also, is the concern with plastics contamination limited to only Tren with MCT from the one domestic vendor? Or only products with MCT but not GSO? thanks!
BA - Benzyl Alcohol, BB - Benzyl BenzoateSorry newb questions, but in the term "MCT BB BA", what do the "BB" and the "BA" stand for? Also, is the concern with plastics contamination limited to only Tren with MCT from the one domestic vendor? Or only products with MCT but not GSO? thanks!
Benzyl Alcohol and Benzyl Benzoate. BA is for sterility. BB is a solvent. The plastics issue is so far only suspected in Primal’s Tren E 400.Sorry newb questions, but in the term "MCT BB BA", what do the "BB" and the "BA" stand for? Also, is the concern with plastics contamination limited to only Tren with MCT from the one domestic vendor? Or only products with MCT but not GSO? thanks!
Is this because the other products (so far) haven't been specifically tested for the possible plastic contaminant? Or would that suspicious peak have shown up already in standard Jano tests of the other products?The plastics issue is so far only suspected in Primal’s Tren E 400.
Is this because the other products (so far) haven't been specifically tested for the possible plastic contaminant? Or would that suspicious peak have showed up already in standard Jano tests of the other products?
and the sad thing is if we get a vendor which agrees to this and fixes the issue he will probably go to jail in the next year or so lmao.Lack of testing.
No testing no problems perfect gear.
Lack of testing.
No testing no problems perfect gear.
If vendors only pay for mg/ml testing then all you get is mg/ml results.
Nothing else.
Is this because the other products (so far) haven't been specifically tested for the possible plastic contaminant? Or would that suspicious peak have shown up already in standard Jano tests of the other products?
That's what I mean -- didn't the original "suspicious plastic peak" show up in a standard GCMS report? Nobody was specifically looking for it?Hasn't shown up in other GCMS reports, so maybe not
That's what I mean -- didn't the original "suspicious plastic peak" show up in a standard GCMS report? Nobody was specifically looking for it?
And the running theory is that the oil in the vial reacts with the rubber self-healing membrane of the vial and causes microplastics/nanoplastics to leech into the oil? And this is because the membrane is made of a material that shouldn't be used with oils but is ok for water-soluble things like peptides?
