Search results for query: Plausible deniability

...the ones who ordered it. If they were smart they would have had other packages also sent around the same time so that they have plausible deniability for opening the pack….although given the fact they used Fed ex they may not be that bright. It will be interesting to see how their legal team...

...because they don't feel comfortable sending something that is illegal through the mail system. That in and of itself is a felonious offense and something that should be considered when sending out samples. Plausible deniability is much easier when receiving a pack than getting caught...

I Pointed out those inconsistencies yesterday he blames it on jano 5% testing allowance.

Put everything in a safe with keypad no key. If shit goes down lock the safe, sorry officer you dont know password. This has saved many asses in court. It goes without saying make sure some1 else knows the combo and not.you. plausible deniability.

it was suggested months ago. My guess is (edit) plausible deniability he doesnt want to have a specific concentration tied to a batch number when there are inevitably going to be variances in concentration do to one batch actually being many small batches (as confirmed by the source himself).

...attempt to waste my time. You're heavily insinuating (while being smart enough to avoid definite statements to keep some plausible deniability) that the products of the brand you represent are completely ok well past their expiry date, decades even, so it better be you who produces results...

...him how he can claim them haha ….it’s unfortunate when people get jammed up over mail bc from my understanding it’s called Plausible Deniability …it’s quite common for the mail people and fuzz to jack your packs believe it or not if your in the game heavy but never have I heard of anyone...

Actually you are wrong because I am not going to use it or resell it... went right down the bin, nor I will use the store credit and much rather would of preferred bitcoin deposited back into my wallet as my usual go to sources have what i needed back in stock again. This was just once off...

he only ever speaks in generalities. Never giving a hard opinion on anything. Always maintains plausible deniability...

Why the source should not accept it? They don't know what wallet address you are using lol. Because you have no plausible deniability if you send from the exchange to the source. Let's say the source get busted and they analyse their bitcoin transaction they can easily find your exchange...

Exactly. Nothing but the obvious, and extreme overuse of the word "as". But other than that, I'd probably enjoy having a beer with him and asking him questions to hear his answers.

...I was a witness too. Now I understand why. I didn't lie though. I didn't even pay for my shit. I would gape them in the court. Plausible deniability. The golden standard so that you receive illegal shit problems free. Correct opsec for the transaction and they can't do jack. House empty...

You do not overdose lady var: ok. Can you explain the 25% variance? I’m starting to wonder if only testing 1 cap of each oral was for plausible deniability. I honestly don’t know what to think. Does Jano have more caps he can test?

I was curious about that response too, I thought he overdosed all orals so I said overdosing Ladyvar is probably not a good idea. So it's either you overdose it or it's an even worse 25% variance without you overdosing it? Someone smarter step in here. If you don't intentionally overdose the...

Because I thought you sided with science and dealt in facts and evidence. An accusation was made – I would simply like to see if that accusation is founded in any data. We cannot know if something is “expired” if we do not even have a definition of “expired.” This is why I simply ask: How do...

Ok. Just received your email. The price list has been sent to your email inbox.

The issue is that it can get flagged, making it more likely to be seized. However I guess some people say otherwise for plausible deniability

As far as I'm concerned, PPL or anyone else, if they sell it..they share in the blame. If they sell inferior product regardless of it originally came from them or not, and theyre perpetuating the problem..basically just plausible deniability and passing it on to the customers

Are you really that paranoid ordering AAS ? Seems a little crazy, though I don’t know what the laws in your country are and maybe they kill you for ordering steroids or something but I wasn’t even that paranoid picking up 55 gallon drums of GBL shipped from China to my local shipyard.

...Post" -- when I do open it I am usually already at the place, not my home residence, where I keep these items), I do still have plausible deniability regarding the contents (in the rare -- not ever going to happen for small personal orders -- event LE ever questioned me, I simply say nothing...

...using a bunch of fake names etc. Packages absolutely get flagged for fake info such as return addresses etc. You still have plausible deniability if the package is in your real name, once you have to sign for a package/receive it, then it starts getting iffy. Now if you are ordering 30kg of...

...the stuff to you as a regular package and just go with it. Fake names and addresses cause more harm than good you still have plausible deniability with your actual name. fake names etc should only be used if you have the ability to register a proper drop/receiving mail. Realistically...

...a small amount of gear. Once you receive the package don't open it for a few days if you are that worried about a CD. There is plausible deniability to a degree. Unless you are already under investigation for something and they are watching you, I would not worry. Are you sure you're not a cop?

Lol no I'm not a cop. Thanks for all the info, I appreciate it!