Search results for query: Naps

...and positively influence harm minimization. Yet the doubts were raised in the two specific situations that you mentioned - one involving Naps and most recently one involving QSC. Naps and QSC engaged in behaviors that were widely and justifiably condemned. Many members sought permanent...

I just saw this. I am a little surprised and disappointed. You could have mentioned this in one of our private messages over the past couple years. At any rate, better late than never. I will address your concerns at a later date.

As I said at the time, I probably should have issued a permanent ban instead of a 3 month ban for the Naps threat containing those elements. If it happened today, I would. But I did not when it would have made a difference. There are always lessons to learn from your mistakes. And issuing a...

I just replied to your previous post in another thread. The same bears repeating here: Member are actively encouraged to share their opinions, experiences, feedback, reviews, and criticism of sources and otherwise hold them accountable. There are few restrictions when it comes to this e.g. no...

There was a time when most members used certain tactics in a very targeted manner to expose problematic sources. The issues were inevitably explicitly identified in order to hold the sources accountable. These tactics were largely limited to sources, reps, and shameless shills in the underground...

You said there was no consequence to his behavior. The spamming of third-party reviews by sources was prohibited as a direct consequence. Naps was temporarily banned as a direct consequence of his behavior. In retrospect, as I've admitted on multiple occasions, the ban should have been longer...

The ambiguity of his statement is noted. Consequently, it's can't be 100% true. He should have said "you mean like Napsgear did with zero consequences for months on end?" if that's what he really meant. Saying "you mean like Napsgear did for months on end with zero consequences?" leaves open...

No source has to pay anything at all to share third-party reviews, post original photos, or share product lab tests. This has always been allowed - at least for the last 10 years.

No. No one has been banned for speaking out against, criticizing, insulting, posting negative reviews, etc. regarding a source. This has not only been going on for years, and explicitly allowed, it continues to this day without consequence.. Do you know what will get you banned? Violating the...

Not true at all. No one has ever been banned for speaking out against any source. MESO strongly encourages everyone to share their experiences with all sources. Don't discourage the OP or anyone else from sharing their experiences. To do so is a disservice to the community.

You can say whatever you want to say about naps or any other source. But if you come here to deter people from posting negative reviews with unfounded assertions that they will be banned for doing so, you are actively trying to harm and sabotage the board. You are not welcome here. Members...

Why would I ban you? For lying about what is allowed and not allowed on this forum? @Btcowboy and @Cherokee did nothing wrong. In fact, they did what this forum encourages - sharing source reviews. I think I would know.

Having an unpopular or popular opinion on naps had nothing to do with it. The repeated violation of multiple rules, intentional violation of rules, blatant disregard for the rules, and/or mocking of the rules along with personal attacks, both public and private, had everything to do with it.

The steroid underground subforum encourages people to post positive and negative reviews of sources. Direct, first-hand reviews are preferred but the sharing of third-party reviews is permitted especially if the attribution is given to the origin of the review. In addition, original photos of...

Not true. No one has ever been banned for this. You're doing more harm than good by deterring people from posting negative reviews with your false claims. Sharing customer reviews, both negative and positive, are a core part of the uncensored source feedback encouraged by MESO. Firsthand direct...

That's really great. The forum works exactly as it is intended. The thread then serves as an exposé of these practices. Why are you seeking my approval? I am not concerned about a source-related thread where each source post receives multiple negative/critical responses from members. I am more...

...just want to promote the agenda of a group of wannabe martyrs who wanted everyone to falsely believe they were banned for speaking out against naps. The truth is that they were banned for violating the rules and guidelines, blatantly and repeatedly, even after numerous explanations of the...

You are not just willfully ignorant but purposefully ignoring the truth.

You are still clueless.

Explain how naps is getting special treatment. You have no argument.

...addressed why posting original product photos is not considered spam I encourage you to make the case, post side by side screenshots, etc that Naps is making fake reviews, etc. I also encourage to make the technical case about how automated means are being used to manipulate this forum...

...their negative and positive opinions regarding any source in the steroid underground subforum. It is readily apparent, especially in the naps threads, that the literally thousands of negative posts by hundreds of members have not been deleted. And members are just as free to post their...

Tell me @MindlessWork , what exactly doesn't make sense to you? The manspreading kerfuffle? It had more to with getting rid of racist and misogynistic piece of shits from the forum. In case you didn't know, these kind of personal attacks will be you banned too. Good luck finding a forum that...

Not at all. As always, everyone is free to say whatever they want about sources. All opinions are permitted. No opinions or experiences are deleted. To suggest otherwise is utterly false. But you do have to respect the rules of the forum and refrain from personal attacks against the...

I don't have much patience for people who blatantly lie about what happened. Naps behavior was never ignored. It was immediately addressed at the time and he was immediately banned at the time. When the past behavior was brought up in recent days, it was also addressed. So Maybe you missed my...