Photon
Member
Is there any point in testing raws?
Assume the following scenario. You have 100g of raws, you can either
Option 1
(1) Send a sample (0.2g - 1g) for raws testing and assume the purity is representative of the whole 100g (probably not).
(2) Brew it or not (dump it if purity sucks).
(3) Filter, leave in beaker, send product for testing.
(4) Adjust if needed.
(5) Filter into vials.
Total cost (120x2=$240). And lets face it, most wont send the finished product for testing.
vs
Option 2
(1) Do not test raws, assume 85% - 90% purity depending on product. Brew 30-50g.
(2) Filter, leave in beaker, send product for mg/ml and GCMS testing. GCMS will show the breakdown BA/BB, impurities, etc.
(3) Work backwards using simple math to find purity% based off GCMS.
(4) Adjust if needed. If purity sucks, dump product.
(5) Filter into vials.
Total cost (120+130(GCMS?)=$250)
Option 1 assumes that the sample sent for testing is representative of the whole.
Maybe the sample you picked was badly contaminated or has degraded due to heat. Who knows? But its only a really small part of your entire batch.
Option 2 does GCMS on the final product, isn't this more important?
This is what goes into your body, impurities and all. You also get the purity% of 30-50g of the compound..rather than what..a pathetic 0.2-1g?
If the purity sucks, you just wasted some BA/BB and oil which isn't significant.
In an ideal world, you GCMS both raws and final product. In reality, most only do purity% testing of raws or mg/ml testing on final product.
Is there something I'm missing?
Assume the following scenario. You have 100g of raws, you can either
Option 1
(1) Send a sample (0.2g - 1g) for raws testing and assume the purity is representative of the whole 100g (probably not).
(2) Brew it or not (dump it if purity sucks).
(3) Filter, leave in beaker, send product for testing.
(4) Adjust if needed.
(5) Filter into vials.
Total cost (120x2=$240). And lets face it, most wont send the finished product for testing.
vs
Option 2
(1) Do not test raws, assume 85% - 90% purity depending on product. Brew 30-50g.
(2) Filter, leave in beaker, send product for mg/ml and GCMS testing. GCMS will show the breakdown BA/BB, impurities, etc.
(3) Work backwards using simple math to find purity% based off GCMS.
(4) Adjust if needed. If purity sucks, dump product.
(5) Filter into vials.
Total cost (120+130(GCMS?)=$250)
Option 1 assumes that the sample sent for testing is representative of the whole.
Maybe the sample you picked was badly contaminated or has degraded due to heat. Who knows? But its only a really small part of your entire batch.
Option 2 does GCMS on the final product, isn't this more important?
This is what goes into your body, impurities and all. You also get the purity% of 30-50g of the compound..rather than what..a pathetic 0.2-1g?
If the purity sucks, you just wasted some BA/BB and oil which isn't significant.
In an ideal world, you GCMS both raws and final product. In reality, most only do purity% testing of raws or mg/ml testing on final product.
Is there something I'm missing?
Last edited:
