Got my blood back for current test E that Im running.

Fastmugga

New Member
So I was running this test e from a local guy. It was called starchem labs and the label looked really cheap. But I figured fuck it maybe the brewer was better at brewing then making labels. Anyways here are my bloods. I was running 650mg of this shit a week. 3359 ng/dl test level for that would definitely be considered underdosed for 650mg a week correct? Question is what would them test levels be equivalent to mg wise?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2015-08-31-13-19-44.png
    Screenshot_2015-08-31-13-19-44.png
    110.3 KB · Views: 42
Your right it seems a bit underdosed, i would say these numbers are more in line with say
400-500mg per week devided in two pins.
Of course we're all a little different but that is in the ball park i believe.
 
Bro, how long after last pin did you have them taken?
How long were you on it?
Pinned Monday morning. Blood drawn Tuesday morning. But I figured by 9 weeks levels would be stable at least at a cerrain amount. I didn't think that at any pointthey should drop to where they are.
 
Pinned Monday morning. Blood drawn Tuesday morning. But I figured by 9 weeks levels would be stable at least at a cerrain amount. I didn't think that at any pointthey should drop to where they are.
I hear you.
It wasn't stated that's why I asked.
Too bad man. Sorry to hear that
 
I think these numbers only would seem maybe slightly under dosed, plus you may have had a higher peak if tested at 48 hrs with test e. If you split into 2 325mg pins, going off the 10x rule applying to LAST PIN and NOT weekly dosage, your sitting right at 10x. The peak may have even been higher at 48 hours after pin. I don't think this see s too bad, maybe slightly under dosed.
 
10x my ball sack ..
If I had one .. O wait I do have a sack.. It's balls I don't have ..

Look at it this way..
Your test levels are still higher than the total of three high school football players ..
And possibly half the cheerleading squad...
Unless it's the Bulgarian high school cheersquad
 
When people have talked about getting bloodwork to see if their test is dosed properly, people commonly look for a level of their test dosage x10 for a guesstimate. I was under the impression that this estimation applied to the dosage of the last amount pinned, and not total weekly dosage. Because one pin a week at 650mg will provide for a higher peak than 325mg pinned twice a week, which won't have as high of a peak but provide more stable blood levels. Then again there is nothing that proves the accuracy of this so called 10x rule. I was simply stating that if it were to be applied to this situation, assuming he was pinning 325mg twice a week, the the 10x would apply to the 325 dosage so 325x10=3250 his bloods came back at 3359 so they would be 10x his most recent pin dosage. It's also possible that his test level would have came back higher would he have waited the full 48 hours prior to blood draw allowing for the peak of serum levels.
Correct me if I'm wrong this is just the understanding I have come to
 
I really don't buy into this last pin shit. If you guys had looked at roidcalc when it was up and running you would see how half lives work and blood levels work off of different dosages. I totally agree that by week 9 your blood levels would be as stable as they were going to get. How much any one shot , or in this case 24 hours, is going to affect the numbers is a little bit in question. By week 9 i think you would be expecting to see the effect of 490mg in your bloodstream at any given time or thereabouts, which you attain around the middle of week 4.

hOfdQ.jpg


That is taken from an old post in 2012 about test half-lives by Foreveryoung. Just saving you the lookup.
 
Back
Top