The prosecution also played for the jury a part of the Congressional hearings in which Cummings read an affidavit from Andy Pettitte’s wife, Laura. In the affidavit, she said that her husband had told her about a conversation he had with Clemens about Clemens’s use of human growth hormone.
Judge Walton ruled last week that Laura Pettitte’s testimony would be barred from the trial, unless it was needed for rebuttal evidence when Andy Pettitte was on the stand.
“I’m very troubled by this,” Judge Walton said. “We’ve spent a lot of money to reach this point. Government counsel should have been more cautious about what was presented so we are not in this situation.”
Judge Walton stopped the video while Cummings was speaking on the video, then the lawyers on both sides met at the bench to discuss what had transpired. After the jury was excused, Rusty Hardin, Clemens’s lead lawyer, said he was disturbed that the paused video remained on the screen for the jury to see while the lawyers spoke.
“We’re going to have to move for a mistrial,” he said, adding that “the entire time we were at the bench, Cummings’s statement was on the screen for the jury to look at.”
The statement was: “Let me read to you what his wife said in her affidavit. I, Laura Pettitte, do depose and state, in 1999 or 2000, Andy told me he had a conversation with Roger Clemens in which Roger admitted to him using human growth hormones.”
After the judge ruled that Laura Pettitte’s testimony was inadmissible, the government should have taken care to redact that part of the video, Judge Walton said. He also said the defense should have objected as soon as the images were put on the screen.