HCG only vs. TRT only vs. TRT/HCG Combo

DavidZ

New Member
SWALE said:
No, just T does not do the same things. They (T from HCG and T from TRT) are completely different.
Why? Isn't T just T?

If anything, I would think the body would prefer the T that it makes to exogenous T.

SWALE said:
I have achieved the same serum androgen levels in men with test cyp or test gel they had on just HCG, and all report they felt better on the testosterone.
Do you have a medical explanation for this reported response?

I'm not challenging the responses that have been reported. Rather I'm probing to see if there's a known or suspected scientific explanation for them.

One possible explanation is that, as we've discussed before, HCG is trickier to dosage correctly.

SWALE said:
THEN, when I added in HCG, they felt even better.
Do you have an explanation for this reported response? I've read your description of the hormonal pathways that HCG opens up compared with standard TRT alone. However, if thats the explanation, then it doesn't make sense to me that men on TRT alone would report feeling better than on HCG alone. It seems to me that it should be the other way around men on HCG alone should feel better than men on TRT alone.

SWALE said:
You are limiting yourself with just HCG. HCG alone simply does not bring the benefits T does. Try it, you will see.
Swale, based on your comments that (a) skipping days on an HCG protocol produces roller coaster T levels and (b) the body likes consistency, I decided to switch my HCG only protocol from twice a week to daily. Actually, nightly (shots taken at bedtime) because I believe in following the circadian rhythm. My new HCG shot dosage is 65 to 70 IU every night before bed.

I don't have blood tests yet, but so far I like the new regimen.

Thanks for your comments and suggestions! :D
 
I have just started looking around for information on this also.

QUOTE:
Do you have an explanation for this reported response? I've read your description of the hormonal pathways that HCG opens up compared with standard TRT alone. However, if thats the explanation, then it doesn't make sense to me that men on TRT alone would report feeling better than on HCG alone. It seems to me that it should be the other way around men on HCG alone should feel better than men on TRT alone.
END QUOTE

That seems like that's how it should work to me also. It seems to me that it should be the other way around men on HCG alone should feel better than men on TRT alone...

Question: Does the hCG have to be continued on "forever" or can it re-start the HPAT Axis and resurrect one's natural production of T?

Am a "newbie" in this game (to some extent anyway), so forgive me if I am overlooking some very basic info etc.

LRS
 
stat1951 said:
Question: Does the hCG have to be continued on "forever" or can it re-start the HPAT Axis and resurrect one's natural production of T?
I posed this question in another thread. See:
https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/134234868

Unfortunately, it appears that we don't yet know the answer to this question. My personal experience (discussed in some detail in the other thread) seems to indicate that it's possible but, unless you're a hypogonadism is from steroid use, it's a very slow process.
 
I'm willing to bet that, for some, to get your T levels high enough with just HCG would require quite a bit of it which would then elevate your E too high. That could cause the disparity between T and HCG therapies. I'm also guessing that since HCG raises other levels that it may raise one of them too high which could cause negatives as well.

As for restarting the HPTA.....I just can't see how this would be possible. HCG basically mimics LH right? So it is suppressing LH production. SO, when you come off of HCG the pituitary won't be producing any. How's this restarting? Although I did just think of one reason. Could it be possible that the gland is overstressed and overworked? Then, by allowing it to shut down production for a while you are giving it a rest. Then, when you come off HCG it's "ready" to go back to work? A theory at least.
 
Weatherlite said:
I'm willing to bet that, for some, to get your T levels high enough with just HCG would require quite a bit of it which would then elevate your E too high. That could cause the disparity between T and HCG therapies.
That doesn't make sense to me. For any desired level of T there's a specific dosage of HCG that will yield that amount of T. Finding that specific dosage of HCG is another story.

Weatherlite said:
I'm also guessing that since HCG raises other levels that it may raise one of them too high which could cause negatives as well.
That would depend on the amount of HCG each man needs to get their T into the upper normal range. I only need about 410 iu/week to get my T into the upper normal range. Most men need much more.

Weatherlite said:
As for restarting the HPTA.....I just can't see how this would be possible.
Here's what Swale said in another thread:

I, too have heard of it happening.

It seems like the body, once equilibrated at a good serum androgen level, seeks to maintain same, and will "pull up" low T levels sans TRT to get back there (sometimes).

It's nothing we can count on, though. The bottom line is that (1) NOTHING will surprise me with respect to the Endocrinological system anymore (2) Mother Nature is, was, and always will be, the boss.
 
DavidZ said:
Here's what Swale said in another thread:

I, too have heard of it happening.

It seems like the body, once equilibrated at a good serum androgen level, seeks to maintain same, and will "pull up" low T levels sans TRT to get back there (sometimes).

It's nothing we can count on, though. The bottom line is that (1) NOTHING will surprise me with respect to the Endocrinological system anymore (2) Mother Nature is, was, and always will be, the boss.

David,

Swale never said such a thing in regards to hCG "RESTARTING the HP".

Dustin
 
DavidZ said:
Yes, he did. See his posting in the thread entitled "Can HCG Restart the H/P Axis To Become Self-sufficient Again?" at:

https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/134234868

First, the title in question "Can HCG Restart the H/P Axis To Become Self-sufficient Again? was coined by you not him. Second, his response was about the adjustments of hCG.

He wrote:

The body, once equilibrated at a good serum androgen level, seeks to maintain same, and will "pull up" low T levels sans TRT to get back there (sometimes).

So as you can see, he never said hCG helped RESTART THE HP.

I highly doubt he had this in mind, when he said nothing surprises him anymore. He has a lot of clinical experience, yet there comes times when a certain dose of T can put a patient in the upper normal range, whereas others you have to constantly titrate the dosage to achieve the levels of same. Also, it was noticed that patients on TRT, will show a reduction in E. I can't explain the later, but it happens. I think he was steering in that direction.

Dustin
 
Last edited:
RE: HCG Restart the H/P Axis

Maybe SWALE can tell us what he meant by his comments rather than this second guessing?

Also....

Both SWALE and Dr. Shippen seem to have a lot of clinical experiences in this area, but the fact is that their combined practices would account for a very, very small percentage of patients treated for hypogonadism worldwide. Additionally, only a very small fraction of a percent of hypogonadal patients post on the Internet support sites / informational sites. Finally, individuals who had successfully gone through a regimen where their HPA Axis (or HPAT Axis) was successfully re-started would very likely NOT be looking for boards like this to post on. If things are better and where you want them to be and life is good, then most people tend to move on and not continue to hawk board such as this.

I know that psychiatric researchers have found that many people with severe depression have highly elevated (well above maximum normal ranges) of cortisol levels (these being non Cushing's Disease individuals) and that the research indicated that their HPA Axis as related to cortisol production was out of kilter. Clinical studies have shown that short-term application of RU-486 (an extremely strong anti-cortisol drug originally developed in France for Cushing's Disease patients which then became infamous as the "abortion pill") not only relieved their severe depression but apparently "re-set" their HPA Axis and resulted in the return of normal cortisol secretions. The short-term applications in these trials were in the range of 4 - 7 days.

I show this example just to address the fact that - in at least the area of cortisol production - it seems that the HPA Axis can be "re-set" fairly readily.

I guess what I'm looking for if anyone has ever done any PubMed searches or other related medical / clinical trial studies to see if the HPAT Axis has been successfully re-started in appropriate cases (is it primary hypogonadism or secondary hypogonadism - and how does one tell the difference absed upon what test result readings)? And whether or not other substances than simply hCG have been looked in to???

In my situation, I have possibly a Pheo tumor which generates chronic secretion of adrenaline and its various co-factors. That then frequently causes - as appears to be the case in my situation - severe anxiety which then causes a simultaneous high production of cortisol. High levels of cortisol basically screw up all of your other hormones as well as your nervous system, etc. In going through Cushing's Support boards on the Internet, I find it very interesting that many of the male posters also report hypogonadal symptoms.

In my case, I was not hypogonadal for years nor did the hypogonadal state slowly appear. It literally appeared overnight within two weeks of a sudden onslaught of severe anxiety (caused possibly by this potential Pheo tumor) - along with several other unrelated physical symptoms (tinnitus, periphernal neuropathy type pains, flushing/itching symptoms of upper torso, a prostatitis type symptom - that actually seems more like an UTI - that comes and goes,
etc.).

So I wonder if the Pheo tumor has caused the "interference" with the HPA Axis and if surgical removal of the Pheo will "fix" the hypogonadal situation - or at least allow something like hCG to "re-set" the HPA Axis....
 
DLMCBBB said:
First, the title in question "Can HCG Restart the H/P Axis To Become Self-sufficient Again? was coined by you not him. Second, his response was about the adjustments of hCG.
Swale was responding to the entire thread, including the title.

DLMCBBB said:
He wrote:

The body, once equilibrated at a good serum androgen level, seeks to maintain same, and will "pull up" low T levels sans TRT to get back there (sometimes).

So as you can see, he never said hCG helped RESTART THE HP.
Do you know what "sans" means? It means "without."

I agree that Swale could have been implying that TRT could restart the H/P axis, but given the topic of the thread, I don't think that's what he was saying.

DLMCBBB said:
I highly doubt he had this in mind, when he said nothing surprises him anymore.
I disagree. But as stat1951 said, why don't we let Swale tell us what he said/meant rather than debating it between ourselves. Besides, this conversation belongs in the "Can HCG restart the H/P Axis" thread, not this one.
 
Nope. I have no idea why the same serum androgen level produced by direct supplementation feels better than that produced by HCG alone. But I did not make this up; nor did I predict this. I just have had so many guys report this that I am merely passing it along.

When considering hormonal issues, you will see every single possible variation in response. That is why case studies must be taken with an appropriate grain of salt. Watch long enough, and nothing will surprise you anymore.

I remember a certain online "longevity" clinic's so-called "Medical Director" basing the cycling of TRT (which we all know is nonsense) on a single case study of man on STEROIDS developing pituitary calcification--and even though there is no evidence whatsoever that cycling TRT would prevent that from happening (in fact, even a rudimentary understanding of how the body functions would show that it could not). So even those who try to pass themselves off as experts make this mistake.

HCG definitely elevates serum testosterone levels. And doing so definitely suppresses HPTA function. Especially when the HCG dosing is too high (as it usually is) and excess estrogen is produced.

I suspect in these cases the body was already trying to reverse the secondary hypogonadism, and the HCG was basically getting in the way (except with respect to restoring testicular response). Once it was removed, endogenous production resumed.
 
SWALE said:
Nope. I have no idea why the same serum androgen level produced by direct supplementation feels better than that produced by HCG alone. But I did not make this up; nor did I predict this. I just have had so many guys report this that I am merely passing it along.
Fair enough.

I suspect that the trickiness of HCG dosing is at least a partial explanation for the responses you are getting.

With TRT, you administer it, the body shuts down T production, and then all you need to do is maintain T levels based on the replacement dosage.

But HCG dosing is much trickier. The evidence shows that (for whatever reason!) the body becomes more responsive to HCG over time. First, there's that "self-priming effect" study that showed that the second HCG shot produced far more T than the first shot. Then there's the comments in Shippen's protocol that say that early Leydig cell response increases over time. Last (but not least :) ) is my experience where my HCG dosage has decreased gradually by about 50% over 5 years of HCG administration.

In other words, if you maintain your HCG dosage at a constant level, your T levels will gradully rise, which will cause excess E2. Therefore, if you don't gradually reduce your HCG dosage over time (based on frequent blood tests), you will report disatisfaction with an HCG only protocol.

However, all of this assumes that the man is responsive to HCG. As we all know, the range of responsiveness in men to HCG is huge.

Add all these factors together and you can see how tricky it is to dosage HCG.
 
Last edited:
This is a longer posting, but is actually just segments of the full article...

QUOTE:

Objective:

Although shown to be effective for their intended medical treatment, AAS have been shown to induce hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in adult males. The medical literature is conflicting in the reports of spontaneous return and long-term suppression of gonadal suppression post AAS usage. This observational study documents the treatment protocol of HCG, clomiphene citrate, and tamoxifen in returning hormonal function to normal post AAS usage.

Design: Five HIV-negative males age 27-49, weighing 77-100 kg, with serum total testosterone levels below 240 ng/dL and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels below 1.5 mIU/mL were considered for this observational study. All five patients were administered the treatment protocol.

Methods: Treatment consisted of combination therapy which included concurrent administration of (a) Human Chorionic Gonadotropin, (b) Clomiphene Citrate and (c) Tamoxifen Citrate for a standard duration of 45 days. This protocol was repeated with every patient until serum LH and total testosterone values reached normal ranges.

Results: All five patients were considered eugonadal by normal laboratory reference ranges by the conclusion of treatment. Average serum total testosterone rose from 98.2 to 692.8 ng/dL (p<.001) while the average serum LH rose from an average undetectable value of less than 1.0 to 7.92 mIU/mL (p<.0008).

Conclusions: Although the treatment protocol of HCG, clomiphene citrate, and tamoxifen proved beneficial in reversing AAS induced hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, future controlled studies need to be performed to confirm the beneficial effects of this combined pharmacotherapy in returning HPGA functioning to normal.

This condition typically results from an abnormality in the normal functioning of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis (HPGA), usually from a negative feedback inhibition of one of the hormone secreting glands, causing a cascading unbalance in the rest of the axis. Possibly resulting from a physiological abnormality (i.e. mumps orchitis, Klinefelters syndrome, pituitary tumor) or as an acquired result of exogenous factors (i.e. androgen therapy, AAS administration). Clerico et al (1981) found a dramatic suppression of serum gonadotropin levels in athletes given methandrostenelone, suggesting a direct action of AAS on the hypothalamus.

One particular study administered 600 mg of nandrolone decanoate to 30 HIV-positive males over twelve weeks (Sattler et al, 1999). The results made no reference to LH or testosterone levels. The lack of gonadotropin measurement is puzzling as the data showed 12 of 30 subjects experienced testicular shrinkage, implying Leydig cell dysfunction and suppressed testosterone levels. Other studies using AAS have also shown no reference to LH or FSH levels but suppressed values are expected in each case (Bagatell et al, 1994; Behre et al, 1997; Sheffield-Moore et al, 1999; Tricker et al, 1996).

Declining, or suppressed, circulating testosterone levels as a result of either pathophysiological or induced hypogonadal conditions can have many negative consequences in males. Declining levels of testosterone have been directly linked to a progressive decrease in muscle mass (Mauras et al, 1998), loss of libido (Schiavi et al, 1991), decrease in muscular strength (Balagopal et al, 1997; Mauras et al, 1998) impotence (Rakic et al, 1997), oligospermia or azoospermia (Vermeulen & Kaufman, 1995), increase in adiposity (Mauras et al, 1998) and an increased risk of osteoporosis (Wishart et al, 1995).

While some research suggests that the hormonal axis will spontaneously return to normal shortly after cessation of testosterone administration (Knuth et al, 1989), documented cases have taken up to 2 years to return to normal (Jarow & Lipshultz, 1990). This case of a 39-year old male who previously used AAS was found to have low serum testosterone levels (6nmol/L, range 14 to 28 nmol/L) 2 years after his last administration of the drugs (Jarow & Lipshultz, 1990). For most men, suffering with diminished libido, impotence, depression, fatigue, muscle atrophy, and infertility for 2 years is not a pleasant option. Other androgen or anabolic steroid induced cases of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism have taken 6 months (Gazvani et al, 1997; Wu et al, 1996), 8 months (Gazvani et al, 1997), 10 months (Boyadjiev et al, 2000), 12 months (Schurmeyer et al, 1984), and 18 months (Gazvani et al, 1997) to finally return to eugonadal status.

The individual use of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), clomiphene citrate, and tamoxifen citrate in the treatment of testicular sub-function and gonadotropin suppression, respectively, is well documented. HCG has been shown to significantly improve gonadal function in hypogonadotropic hypogonadal adult males (Barrio et al, 1999; Burgess & Calderon, 1997; Cisternino et al, 1998; DAgata et al, 1982; 1984; Dunkel et al, 1985; Kelly et al, 1982; Ley & Leonard, 1985; Liu et al, 1988; Martikainen et al, 1986; Okuyama et al, 1986; Ulloa-Aguirre et al, 1985; Vicari et al, 1992). Studies using clomiphene citrate to induce endogenous gonadotropin production in males found significant improvements in LH and FSH values after treatment (Bjork et al, 1977; Burge et al, 1997; Guay et al, 1995; Landefeld et al, 1983; Lim & Fang, 1976; Ross et al, 1980; Spijkstra et al, 1988). Tamoxifen citrate has also been found to produce a profound increase in serum LH levels as well as improved semen and sperm quality (Gazvani et al, 1997; Krause et al, 1985; Lewis-Jones et al, 1987; Wu et al, 1996).

As HCGs effect is centralized at the Leydig cells of the testicles, clomiphene citrate and tamoxifen citrate act upon the hypothalamic-pituitary region in stimulating gonadotropin production. Tamoxifen, a nonsteroidal antiestrogen, and clomiphene citrate, a nonsteroidal ovulatory stimulant, compete with estrogen for estrogen receptor binding sites, thus eliminating excess estrogen circulation at the level of the hypothalamus and pituitary and allowing gonadotropin production to resume normally. The normal operation of both the testicular and hypothalamic-pituitary regions is crucial in returning HPGA function to normal. Returning one component of the axis to normal without concurrently returning the other would sabotage and inhibit the operation of the entire HPG axis. It was with this understanding that HCG was eventually combined with clomiphene citrate and tamoxifen as attempted therapy to reverse gonada function in hypogonadotropic hypogonadal males.

In accordance with previous studies, each medication was used individually, and along with HCG, in initial trials. The simultaneous use of clomiphene citrate and tamoxifen was determined through preliminary use of clomiphene citrate and tamoxifen individually. It was discovered that although both clomiphene citrate and tamoxifen met with some success, when combined together they achieved a more significant increase in gonadotropin production. This clinical outcome resulted in the combination therapy of HCG, clomiphene citrate and tamoxifen.

With roughly 4 million men in the U.S. being considered hypogonadal (Lacayo R., 2000; Sheffield-Moore et al, 1999; Shelton DL, 2000), an estimated 200,000 men are currently receiving testosterone treatment for the condition (Shelton DL, 2000). As stated earlier, AAS are being prescribed to HIV & AIDS sufferers to combat progressive muscle loss. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported an estimated 635,000+ men diagnosed with AIDS through December 2000 while an estimated 97,700 have been reported with HIV (Centers for Disease Control, vol.12, No. 2, table 5; Centers for Disease Control, vol. 12, No. 2, table 6). In 2000 alone over 31,000 men were diagnosed with the AIDS virus (Centers for Disease Control, vol. 12, No. 2, figure 3). Between hypogonadal, AIDS, & HIV males, potentially over 900,000 men are being administered AAS therapy.

As described herein, a possible treatment modality may be the combined regimen of HCG, clomiphene citrate, and tamoxifen. Medical history has demonstrated examples of physician-induced complications resulting from treatment. Iatrogenic hyperthyroidism (Bartsch & Scheiber, 1981) and iatrogenic Cushings syndrome (Cihak & Beary, 1977; Kimmerle & Rolla, 1985; Smidt & Johnston, 1975; Tuel et al, 1990) are cases were administered medications or treatments provoked abnormalities in patients normal physiology. The administration of testosterone as a treatment for hypogonadotropic hypogonadism falls into this same category of causing endocrine related abnormalities (Bhasin et al, 1996; Marynick et al, 1979; Strawford et al, 1999; Tenover, 1992). Testosterone replacement therapy has proven to be very effective in reversing the symptoms of suppressed testosterone production, but does not treat the underlying cause of the deficiency....

Because of the negative impact of the hypogonadal state on physical and mental well- being, pharmacotherapy that restores HPGA function more rapidly than current modalities would greatly benefit men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

While we believe that the treatment protocol was effective in returning normal hormonal function to these men, the lack of randomization or a control group leaves room for speculation. Although cases of spontaneous return to eugonadism with no medicinal intervention have been published, these reports documented durations anywhere from 6-18 months before normal hormone status was achieved (Gazvani et al, 1997; Wu et al, 1996). If the alternative treatment modality described herein can reverse suppressed gonadotropin production and AAS associated side effects much sooner than non-treatment, further evaluation of this therapy should continue.

END QUOTE

The more complete article is at this site (only one where I could find it at):

http://www.basskilleronline.com/hpta_reversal.html

I found this section especially interesting:

QUOTE: The normal operation of both the testicular and hypothalamic-pituitary regions is crucial in returning HPGA function to normal. Returning one component of the axis to normal without concurrently returning the other would sabotage and inhibit the operation of the entire HPG axis. It was with this understanding that HCG was eventually combined with clomiphene citrate and tamoxifen as attempted therapy to reverse gonada function in hypogonadotropic hypogonadal males. END QUOTE

And even more so:

QUOTE: This condition typically results from an abnormality in the normal functioning of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis (HPGA), usually from a negative feedback inhibition of one of the hormone secreting glands, causing a cascading unbalance in the rest of the axis. Possibly resulting from a physiological abnormality (i.e. mumps orchitis, Klinefelters syndrome, pituitary tumor) or as an acquired result of exogenous factors (i.e. androgen therapy, AAS administration)... While some research suggests that the hormonal axis will spontaneously return to normal shortly after cessation of testosterone administration (Knuth et al, 1989), documented cases have taken up to 2 years to return to normal (Jarow & Lipshultz, 1990)... The individual use of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), clomiphene citrate, and tamoxifen citrate in the treatment of testicular sub-function and gonadotropin suppression, respectively, is well documented... In accordance with previous studies, each medication was used individually, and along with HCG, in initial trials. The simultaneous use of clomiphene citrate and tamoxifen was determined through preliminary use of clomiphene citrate and tamoxifen individually. It was discovered that although both clomiphene citrate and tamoxifen met with some success, when combined together they achieved a more significant increase in gonadotropin production. This clinical outcome resulted in the combination therapy of HCG, clomiphene citrate and tamoxifen... Medical history has demonstrated examples of physician-induced complications resulting from treatment. Iatrogenic hyperthyroidism (Bartsch & Scheiber, 1981) and iatrogenic Cushings syndrome (Cihak & Beary, 1977; Kimmerle & Rolla, 1985; Smidt & Johnston, 1975; Tuel et al, 1990) are cases were administered medications or treatments provoked abnormalities in patients normal physiology. The administration of testosterone as a treatment for hypogonadotropic hypogonadism falls into this same category of causing endocrine related abnormalities (Bhasin et al, 1996; Marynick et al, 1979; Strawford et al, 1999; Tenover, 1992). Testosterone replacement therapy has proven to be very effective in reversing the symptoms of suppressed testosterone production, but does not treat the underlying cause of the deficiency... Because of the negative impact of the hypogonadal state on physical and mental well-being, pharmacotherapy that restores HPGA function more rapidly than current modalities would greatly benefit men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism... END QUOTE

I wonder whatever happened with further examination of that protocol? From some of the language used it almost sounds like possibly a British study? It seems relatively recent (comparatively speaking) as it references clinical studies from 1999. I wonder if anyone would be interested in duplicating this study with a larger base (I for one would be willing to be a test subject - at least once I get things cleared up with the Pheo tumor or whatever it is!).
 
This article really doesn't tell us anthing new. They talk about a combination of hormones/drugs that are well-known for secondary hypogonadism (HCG, Clomid, Tamoxifen). They note that this combination yields a special result, namely the restoration of normal levels of T, LH and FSH. (My comments: What about health? What about how a person feels? What about side effects? I'm not looking to hit numbers. I'm looking to optimize my health.)

They note that this combination of hormones/drugs restores function to all components in the feedback loop. They note that TRT alone supresses part of the feedback loop, namely the H/P axis, and claim that such suppression has negative health effects. (My comments: Really? What neagtive health effects? What about the negative health effects of chronic use of those 2 drugs - Clomid and Tamoxifen?)
 
David--What exactly is the evidence that the body "becomes more responsive to HCG over time"?
 
SWALE said:
David--What exactly is the evidence that the body "becomes more responsive to HCG over time"?
Three things:

(a) Medline article 4044781 on the "Self-priming effect of HCG," which documents that, for men with secondary hypogonadism, the second HCG shot produced far more T than the first shot,

(b) Dr. Shippen's experience/observation, as discussed in his HCG Protocol, that the Leydig cells produce increasingly more T in response to HCG over the first few weeks/months of administration, and

(c) My personal experience that the weekly HCG dosage required to put my T into the upper normal range decreased gradually from 1,000 IU/week to 410 IU/week over 5 years. For specific dosages and dates, see:
https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/134234868
 
DavidZ said:
Three things:

(a) Medline article 4044781 on the "Self-priming effect of HCG," which documents that, for men with secondary hypogonadism, the second HCG shot produced far more T than the first shot,

(b) Dr. Shippen's experience/observation, as discussed in his HCG Protocol, that the Leydig cells produce increasingly more T in response to HCG over the first few weeks/months of administration, and

(c) My personal experience that the weekly HCG dosage required to put my T into the upper normal range decreased gradually from 1,000 IU/week to 410 IU/week over 5 years. For specific dosages and dates, see:
https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/134234868

I don't see this any different than studies showing absolute increases in T were smallest in prepubertal boys compared to post-pubertal, perhaps reflecting the small potential Leydig cell mass.

Again David, how do you explain the lack thereof of a second peak in T, when the patient is given LH compared to hCG?

Im trying to hear you out. While its true we are all biased in our assessments, and we are influenced by what we read, I strive to be balanced. I just cannot see how hCG "primes" the HP as you are so desperately trying to convey to the bros.

Dustin
 
DLMCBBB said:
I don't see this any different than studies showing absolute increases in T were smallest in prepubertal boys compared to post-pubertal, perhaps reflecting the small potential Leydig cell mass.
Read the article more carefully. The article indicates that men with secondary hypogonadism had NO INITIAL RESPONSE in the 8 hours after the first HCG shot and a very small peak at 48 to 72 hours after. The second HCG shot yielded a strong T response with first and second peaks.

DLMCBBB said:
Again David, how do you explain the lack thereof of a second peak in T, when the patient is given LH compared to hCG?

Im trying to hear you out. While its true we are all biased in our assessments, and we are influenced by what we read, I strive to be balanced. I just cannot see how hCG "primes" the HP as you are so desperately trying to convey to the bros.
Dustin, you seem to have missed my perhaps subtle, but important, change in emphasis here. My point is that men with secondary hypogonadism become more responsive to HCG over time. Please note that I'm not claiming ANY PARTICULAR REASON why that happens. Rather, I'm simply observing it as an important empirical fact.

Another possible explanation, as Dr. Shippen claims in his HCG Protocol based on his years of clinical experience, may be that chronic HCG administration results in Leydig cell regeneration/restoration.
 
DavidZ said:
Read the article more carefully. The article indicates that men with secondary hypogonadism had NO INITIAL RESPONSE in the 8 hours after the first HCG shot and a very small peak at 48 to 72 hours after. The second HCG shot yielded a strong T response with first and second peaks.

Dustin, you seem to have missed my perhaps subtle, but important, change in emphasis here. My point is that men with secondary hypogonadism become more responsive to HCG over time. Please note that I'm not claiming ANY PARTICULAR REASON why that happens. Rather, I'm simply observing it as an important empirical fact.

Another possible explanation, as Dr. Shippen claims in his HCG Protocol based on his years of clinical experience, may be that chronic HCG administration results in Leydig cell regeneration/restoration.

I did read the article carefully, if you have read my responce CAREFULLY I said:

"I don't see this any different than studies showing absolute increases in T were smallest in prepubertal boys compared to post-pubertal, perhaps reflecting the small potential Leydig cell mass."

Note the key word "STUDIES" Not in reference to 4044781! What made you assume that?

Regardless, you have just stated what I said before that, the leydig cell mass has a direct response to hCG stimulation. Very much in line with Dr. Shippens comments (Leydig cell regeneration/restoration).

I think we all agree that previous exposure to LH activity is an obligatory prerequisite, but this in now way demonstrates that hCG has any "priming" affect whatsoever on the HP.

Dustin
 
DLMCBBB said:
I did read the article carefully, if you have read my responce CAREFULLY I said:

"I don't see this any different than studies showing absolute increases in T were smallest in prepubertal boys compared to post-pubertal, perhaps reflecting the small potential Leydig cell mass."

Note the key word "STUDIES" Not in reference to 4044781! What made you assume that?
Your comment was that "I don't see this (article as) any different than (other studies)..."

I was pointing out how this article WAS different from the "studies" you referenced. Namely, the huge increase in response from the first to the second HCG shot for men with secondary hypogonadism (not prepubertal boys).

DLMCBBB said:
Regardless, you have just stated what I said before that, the leydig cell mass has a direct response to hCG stimulation. Very much in line with Dr. Shippens comments (Leydig cell regeneration/restoration).
I stated this as "another possible explanation." I don't rule out other possible explanations, including restoration of H/P axis function.

Also, there's a big difference between saying Leydig cell mass and Leydig cell regeneration/restoration.

DLMCBBB said:
I think we all agree that previous exposure to LH activity is an obligatory prerequisite, but this in now way demonstrates that hCG has any "priming" affect whatsoever on the HP.
Nor does it exclude it as an explanation, either.
 
Back
Top