HGH purity 95%, 97%, 99.9% whats the difference?

[Big-Amsterdam]

question with regards to HGH purity.
If you have 3 bottles of the same HGH, 1 95% purity, 2 97% purity, 3 99.9% purity, how would the strengt between them be compared to each other?

i mean is 97% purity only 2% more strong then 95%, so you have to inject only 2% less to get same effect?

The reason i ask is because suppose i can buy the same HGH 95% purity for $50/100iu, 97% $80/100iu and 99,9% $105/100IU. If the 99,9% of the same type of HGH is only 5% more strong then the 95% then it would be better to just buy the 95% and inject more. can get 2 times the amount of IU for the same price. or does it not work that way?

anyone has any knowledge on how these puritys are related to the amount of HGH in the product? the strength?

 

[jJjburton]

Its never that precise unless it's pharm grade.

 

[janoshik]

Good job on not answering a single question the guy asked.
And thanks god I don't see the point in arguing anymore.

Anyway - the numbers like that are usually pulled out of manufacturers ass.

Other than that, the general scare is that the impurities might be harmful to health.


So yeah, you could be getting twice as much IUs for the same price, but also put your health in jeopardy - guess that's the consensus. Am I wrong here?

 

[Colt44]

I'd always go for purity as long as the quantity is there. Better to pay a little more to know there are less impurities. My guess though is you are being lied to in regards to all of those. Are there any assays to prove what they are telling you? Not that it'd matter much.

 

[jJjburton]

Good job on not answering a single question the guy asked.
And thanks god I don't see the point in arguing anymore.

Anyway - the numbers like that are usually pulled out of manufacturers ass.

Other than that, the general scare is that the impurities might be harmful to health.


So yeah, you could be getting twice as much IUs for the same price, but also put your health in jeopardy - guess that's the consensus. Am I wrong here?

and you said you dont argue.....LOL you didnt answer him well either. You basically re said what the OP wrote.

 

[janoshik]

So you lack reading comprehension as well. Whatever.

 

[jJjburton]

So you lack reading comprehension as well. Whatever.

You actually think the OP is serious here? I thought you dont argue anymore?

 

[Colt44]

Good job on not answering a single question the guy asked.
And thanks god I don't see the point in arguing anymore.

Anyway - the numbers like that are usually pulled out of manufacturers ass.

Other than that, the general scare is that the impurities might be harmful to health.


So yeah, you could be getting twice as much IUs for the same price, but also put your health in jeopardy - guess that's the consensus. Am I wrong here?

Not wrong in my book.

 

[jJjburton]

Not wrong in my book.

yea but the OP has simple info in front of him. SO pharm grade might be his answer, if he cant tell the differnce between 4 percent change with dollar price.

 

[Colt44]

You actually think the OP is serious here? I thought you dont argue anymore?

I highly doubt he is serious. I'm sure his next post will let us know where we can grab these kits in the 90 and up percentile.

 

[jJjburton]

Good job on not answering a single question the guy asked.
And thanks god I don't see the point in arguing anymore.

Anyway - the numbers like that are usually pulled out of manufacturers ass.

Other than that, the general scare is that the impurities might be harmful to health.


So yeah, you could be getting twice as much IUs for the same price, but also put your health in jeopardy - guess that's the consensus. Am I wrong here?

He could be getting scammed too. or all fake stuff.

 

[Colt44]

yea but the OP has simple info in front of him. SO pharm grade might be his answer, if he cant tell the differnce between 4 percent change with dollar price.

I say either way he's fucked. Lol

 

[jJjburton]

I say either way he's fucked. Lol

Exactly and jano is a tool bitch.

 

[janoshik]

Like I said, those claims about purity are usually bullshit.

Also @jJjburton: ur mum

 

[Dr JIM]

question with regards to HGH purity.
If you have 3 bottles of the same HGH, 1 95% purity, 2 97% purity, 3 99.9% purity, how would the strengt between them be compared to each other?

i mean is 97% purity only 2% more strong then 95%, so you have to inject only 2% less to get same effect?

The reason i ask is because suppose i can buy the same HGH 95% purity for $50/100iu, 97% $80/100iu and 99,9% $105/100IU. If the 99,9% of the same type of HGH is only 5% more strong then the 95% then it would be better to just buy the 95% and inject more. can get 2 times the amount of IU for the same price. or does it not work that way?

anyone has any knowledge on how these puritys are related to the amount of HGH in the product? the strength?

The more important question is what these "purifies" are based upon bc GH purity can only be determined thru KNOWING the Amino Acid RATIOS and their SEQUENCE when compared to human GH.

Thus UNLIKE AAS, GH purity is not a measure of the degree of "contamination"!

If the latter was the case most GH would look like trash bc every vial requires the presence of buffers, surfactants, emulsifiers that are NOT
needed in raw AAS powder.

Why? Bc AAS are MUCH more stable polycyclic compounds that are relatively resistant to red-ux reactions
esp compared to poly-PEPs such as GH

For instance take a gander at any of our generic GH assay threads and note
the weight of WHATS IN THE VIAL is only 5-10% GH the remainder is needed "junk". That's certainly not "pure" by any standard.

 

[janoshik]

I've had very lengthy discussions and the definition of HGH purity that came out of them was the following:

Purity of HGH preparation equals ratio of real functioning HGH over total protein content, under condition HGH was the only protein that the preparation was supposed to contain.



You don't really need to know AA ratios or sequence for testing purity...

 

[Colt44]

You don't really need to know AA ratios or sequence for testing purity...

So you don't need to know if you are working with actual rHGH to test for purity of rHGH?

 

[janoshik]

If the latter was the case most GH would look like trash bc every vial requires the presence of buffers, surfactants, emulsifiers that are NOT
needed in raw AAS powder

...


For instance take a gander at any of our generic GH assay threads and note
the weight of WHATS IN THE VIAL is only 5-10% GH the remainder is needed "junk".

This is exactly what lead to many misunderstandings... True that...

That's why the definition written above was come up with - what do you think about that?

So you don't need to know if you are working with actual rHGH to test for purity of rHGH?

You need to know that - but amino acid ratios or sequence are NOT the (only) conditions of knowing that.

You can identify stuff by many other - some better suited - tests. Retention time being the most common with chromatography, fragmentation patterns, circular dichroism etc...

However these all have a condition that AAA does not have - you need to have a standard.

 

[Big-Amsterdam]

i dont understand all the fuss about. basicly this is a very interesting question... does it make sense to spend more money per IU of high quality HGH or spend less per IU on lower quality and just inject more. guys that dont understand the interesting thing about this and only start bashing are just complete morons.

with regards to these results, yes i have from several manufacturars HPLC test, serum tests and lab tests. these are legit prety big biochemical and pharmaceutical companies in china. of course they can fabricate these documents. but as most of the guys on this board buy there HGH from local street dealers i place my bet on legit pharma companies with all these test, even if they could be fabricated which i doubt some of them do because there name is on all the papers. most of these companies sell for millions also agro chemicals and so on so i dont realy see their need to fake paperwork. because of my work i have contact with these companies. probably some guys here that are not able to give nice feedback are only jealous....

i thank others for looking into this more seriously

 

[Dr JIM]

I've had very lengthy discussions and the definition of HGH purity that came out of them was the following:

Purity of HGH preparation equals ratio of real functioning HGH over total protein content, under condition HGH was the only protein that the preparation was supposed to contain.



You don't really need to know AA ratios or sequence for testing purity...

Well for a Pharma GH that's true bc their production processes are reviewed extensively to ensure the product being sold to consumers mimics that of HGH.

This is NOT true of generic GH and a classic example of what could be overlooked by HPLC is the "Z" sample.

That's bc post production sequence or ratio alterations of this nature can only be detected by enzymatic LC/MS or perhaps by changes in IGF