How to retain muscle after a steroid cycle

Pericles

New Member
There are an endless number of threads/articles/discussions about the importance of a proper pct, how to use AI's, HCG, SERMS et al. These discussions are very crucial, as the endocrine system must be restored to normalcy. However another critical component of the post cycle period is hardly discussed at all: How to train in order to keep the size one got from the cycle. In my many years of experience, I see athletes retain 2/3rds of the size and strength the got from the cycle, because they run a correct pct coupled with proper training.

We are all familiar with the fact that steroids increase protein synthesis dramatically, what many do not know or understand is that there is a second role that steroids play in building muscle: They blunt the effect of cortisol. Intense training (absolutely critical to building muscle) increases cortisol. Cortisol/Glucocorticoids induce rapid muscle breakdown and proximal muscle atrophy. Androgen’s suppress this process very effectively. Glucocorticoid-induced muscle atrophy: ... [Endocr Pract. 1999 Sep-Oct] - PubMed - NCBI.

This^ is a large part of why I run gear. I like to do an hour and 20 minutes of high intensity lifting, followed up 25 minute of maximal training hitting the bags. Steroids enable me to do so. There is no way I could do nearly 2 hours of maximal training bereft of androgens

What this all means is that our post cycle workouts must both retain muscle, while at the same time not elevating cortisol. Doing so is a delicate matter, and many, many trainees succumb to this conundrum. Some keep blasting away, desperately trying to do the same workouts as they did on gear. In the words of my favorite villain, Bane, “admirable....but mistaken.”

On the other hand, you have trainees (especially those foolish enough to not do a pct who simply stop working out. Of course they lose all muscle, in fact becoming smaller than they were at the beginning of their cycle.


There was a well written thread on another bodybuilding forum about how to train after a cycle. The author advocated one week off at the end of the cycle. This is actually not a bad idea. However the reason I do not advocate this strategy is that one week might lead to two.... Instead, I argue that one should take a few days off, being careful to set a limit, 3 days or so. I also suggest that they take a day off anytime they feel like doing so. On cycle, I will not miss workouts, I will just suck it up and push through it. Do not do this when off cycle. Doing so is hard for A type personalities, but important.

To understand the next suggestions, lets take a look at training and muscle growth: Muscle do not grow while lifting, The grow when we rest/eat/sleep. The weights are the stimulus for growth. I am a fan of Dorian Yates philosophy, which was a spin on Mike Mentzers “Heavy Duty” philosophy. That philosophy says that we should only do enough sets to stimulate growth, and that is it. Warm up, and then do a “working set.”

A working set requires maximal intensity, going to failure, and then either forced reps, drop sets, etc. You put your heart and soul into that set. Dorian Yates had a similar approach to training, except he advocated 2 working sets.

Myself, and with people I work with, I advocate 3 working sets while on cycle. Warm up and 3 working sets may look like a typical work out program, but is not.

Keep in mind that once you do the first warm up, you don't need warm up for the rest of your sets. So, you do 2-3 sets of bench to warm up followed by 3 working sets. On your next exercise, you do 3 sets total, the first to absolute failure, using rest pause, but no help from a spotter. Same with the second. And to be clear, I am talking about doing everything you can to absolute failure. If you are not training harder than 95% of the people in the gym, you are not training hard enough.

Also, we hit each angle of the muscle, and no more. You will go all out on the bench, but then do no more mid-chest work. No flat fly's, pec deck, nothing. So, 5-6 sets of mid chest, and then hit incline, say 3 sets of all out dumbbell incline presses, forced reps on the final set. Then 3 more for decline. If you do not have a spotter, then do drop sets. If you feel the need to do more sets, then your intensity was not high enough.

Also, when on, I do lots of cardio, 5-6 days a week between high intensity martial arts training, and incline tread mill @ 80% of max heart rate. When off, I still do 2-3 days of cardio. I am older, as big as I want to be and do sports that require a high degree of cardio. Also, I do cardio for health reasons.

As mentioned, if you are a younger guy or gal, trying to get big, you may want to cut out cardio altogether. Cardio will eat into your recovery. One compromise might be to do 20 minutes of low intensity cardio twice a week. You have to determine what is right for you.

Now, onto the topic of weights while off cycle. First, instead of 3 working sets, decrease to 2. Drop all forced reps, drop sets and other extreme effort techniques. Instead, go to 90-95% of maximal intensity. That means one rep less than absolute failure. Try to stay with the same weight you were using on cycle, but one rep less. Be careful, as post cycle is one of the easiest times to get injured.

Years ago, Dan Duchane pointed out research that indicated that the best rep scheme for increasing natural test production was 5. This was true especially for large muscle groups, namely squats and deadlifts. The catch is that these heavy basic lifts were going on during a time that the body was susceptible to injury. Lets unpack this scenario.

Some do pct using a “power pct” approach. That means a large amount of HCG is used for 2-3 weeks after the cycle having long esters. That would get you to the point where esters would clear, and SERMs could be effectively implemented. Others use small amounts of HCG on cycle, and short esters during the end enabling an immediate transition to SERMs. Either way the endocrine system is artificially propped up. As such, there is no need for heavy 5's to stimulate natural test production. I recommend higher reps during this period to prevent injury. Once the SERMs end, transition into the 5 rep schema, being sure to use perfect technique in order to avoid injury. Do so for 2 months, at which point start moving into higher reps and having enough off time to begin a new cycle.
 
you have done your research no doubt. no matter how hard you train after a cycle you will lose strength and size. no way around it, when you go off cycle you will get smaller. ive been using aas for over 20 years and ive never seen anyone keep their size. no way around it natural isnt ever going to be as big or strong. the question is how to minimize the losses. that is done by training hard and keeping a solid diet off cycle.
 
That's not me but to be completely honest my girl picked it because she said i look very close to it, in my prime. I say in my prime because I haven't lifted in 6-7 months do to two injuries. I am healthy now and have no restrictions other than the fact I have some personal issues holding me back. I plan on competing someday after I retire from my sport. That may be sooner than later if I don't make this comeback successful.

I am planning a test prop run at 100 mg eod and 30-40 mg dbol with it. This will be my first cycle and I always took pride in not cycling but at my level everyone does . I had no plans of cycling till these injuries and I know this isn't ideal because I'm not in peak shape but do you think even a small 4 weeker just to get back and then run a 10 weeker with dbol be better? I normally would rather get back to 100 % before cycling but I only have a small window to get back to where i need to be. I stand at 12% bf and 190-195 pounds. I was 10% and 200 pounds at one point. Maybe 205 but was from water weight fluctuating.

What do you think of my goals? I would probably be in the gym three weeks to a month before I started the 4 week prop cycle. Does it sound like a decent idea? I think because I was in such good shape I didn't really lose to much thank god. Don't hold back either PC I have a lot of respect for your views!
 
That's not me but to be completely honest my girl picked it because she said i look very close to it, in my prime. I say in my prime because I haven't lifted in 6-7 months do to two injuries. I am healthy now and have no restrictions other than the fact I have some personal issues holding me back. I plan on competing someday after I retire from my sport. That may be sooner than later if I don't make this comeback successful.



I am planning a test prop run at 100 mg eod and 30-40 mg dbol with it. This will be my first cycle and I always took pride in not cycling but at my level everyone does . I had no plans of cycling till these injuries and I know this isn't ideal because I'm not in peak shape but do you think even a small 4 weeker just to get back and then run a 10 weeker with dbol be better? I normally would rather get back to 100 % before cycling but I only have a small window to get back to where i need to be. I stand at 12% bf and 190-195 pounds. I was 10% and 200 pounds at one point. Maybe 205 but was from water weight fluctuating.



What do you think of my goals? I would probably be in the gym three weeks to a month before I started the 4 week prop cycle. Does it sound like a decent idea? I think because I was in such good shape I didn't really lose to much thank god. Don't hold back either PC I have a lot of respect for your views!


I'd recommend AT LEAST. a month back in the gym without AAS, muscle memory is amazing and a lot of what was lost will come back real quick..

Not sure if dbol is the right choice here... What sport? You can PM me that if you'd like..
 
No, No, No! Get in as good shape as you can, and then (and only then) run a cycle. I would run a long ester test, as the fluid retention will help your injuries. Switch out to prop at the end. Also, you have to train around your injuries. At my age, I am always doing so.

What sport are you in?

That's not me but to be completely honest my girl picked it because she said i look very close to it, in my prime. I say in my prime because I haven't lifted in 6-7 months do to two injuries. I am healthy now and have no restrictions other than the fact I have some personal issues holding me back. I plan on competing someday after I retire from my sport. That may be sooner than later if I don't make this comeback successful.

I am planning a test prop run at 100 mg eod and 30-40 mg dbol with it. This will be my first cycle and I always took pride in not cycling but at my level everyone does . I had no plans of cycling till these injuries and I know this isn't ideal because I'm not in peak shape but do you think even a small 4 weeker just to get back and then run a 10 weeker with dbol be better? I normally would rather get back to 100 % before cycling but I only have a small window to get back to where i need to be. I stand at 12% bf and 190-195 pounds. I was 10% and 200 pounds at one point. Maybe 205 but was from water weight fluctuating.

What do you think of my goals? I would probably be in the gym three weeks to a month before I started the 4 week prop cycle. Does it sound like a decent idea? I think because I was in such good shape I didn't really lose to much thank god. Don't hold back either PC I have a lot of respect for your views!
 
I've read that the rough rule of thumb for muscle memory is that (naturally) it takes approximately half the time you took off to get back to the same level. Obviously there are a hundred factors (diet, daily activity, etc) to consider that can change this but I've noticed when I've taken 6 months off due to medical issues (blinding migraines most recently) it's taken me 3-4 months to get back to around the same level of muscle mass and strength, as long as I maintained a somewhat reasonable diet and didn't sit immobile day in and day out.
 
Pericles, first good info thanks. I noticed you brought up Dan Duchane and his ideas on training, I know he was working on a follow up to body opus that would talk about his current ideas on training and it looks like he died before actually writing the book. I have tried to find info on what he was working on and I found some of it but not much you would happen to know anything about it would you? Thanks
 
Chris Duffy (yes THAT Chris Duffy) new Dan well...I think they even lived together or a bit.

Dan died of Polycystic Kidney Disease. However, Chris said that he was also a morphine addict. That explains, IMO, why he did not publish a follow up. Back in the early 1990's we lab rats (as Dan would call himself and us) put the peices togther. We were running HCG w/ the serm follow up. I was lucky, as I was gyno bulletproof. AI's had not been figured out as far as I know.A lot of plastic surgeons got Rich.

Dans legacy will be that he was a pioneer ,especially in PCT. He was the first to postulate that fertility drugs like Clomid would restore the endocrine system.
 
Chris Duffy (yes THAT Chris Duffy) new Dan well...I think they even lived together or a bit.

Dan died of Polycystic Kidney Disease. However, Chris said that he was also a morphine addict. That explains, IMO, why he did not publish a follow up. Back in the early 1990's we lab rats (as Dan would call himself and us) put the peices togther. We were running HCG w/ the serm follow up. I was lucky, as I was gyno bulletproof. AI's had not been figured out as far as I know.A lot of plastic surgeons got Rich.

Dans legacy will be that he was a pioneer ,especially in PCT. He was the first to postulate that fertility drugs like Clomid would restore the endocrine system.
It was nubain he was addicted to sadly, I did find a site with some that had talked with Dan about what he was working on for that book and it has a outline of it of sorts. It was very interesting especially if you are of the Mentzer high intensity school of though. Mentzer was kind of an ass though! Like talking to a belligerent drunk except he wasn't drunk. :) If I find the site again I will forward you the link if you want.
 
Correct. It was the rage because powerlifters and body builders justified its use because it blunted cortisol. My best friend Rickey died from it. Crazy, because Rickey never touched a drug (I was still active in my addiction when I met Rickey, but was clean and sober when he died...coming up on 17 years).

Rickey would not drink more than a beer and I could not get him to take a puff of marijuana. .He was a former Marine, nationally ranked powerlifter, and Judo BB. By the time he was hooked, I was in grad school in NY. Rickey lived in the Bay Area, where I spent 10 years and I would call him (he was my gear source) and he would be loaded out of his mind. I couldn't believe it.

One day, his wife called. I was the best man at their wedding, and close to both of them. Rickey got high, and ran his motorcycle into the back of a truck killing him instantly.
 
It was nubain he was addicted to sadly, I did find a site with some that had talked with Dan about what he was working on for that book and it has a outline of it of sorts. It was very interesting especially if you are of the Mentzer high intensity school of though. Mentzer was kind of an ass though! Like talking to a belligerent drunk except he wasn't drunk. :) If I find the site again I will forward you the link if you want.

Mentzer was, I heard, a meth addict.
 
Back
Top