is it just me or....

ren

New Member
is test, tren, EQ the best and only cycle youll ever need...we all know that diet is everything so if youre cutting....its perfect....if youre bulking...its perfect.....seems to me thats a solid 10-15 lbs every cycle....

adam
 
ren said:
is test, tren, EQ the best and only cycle youll ever need...we all know that diet is everything so if youre cutting....its perfect....if youre bulking...its perfect.....seems to me thats a solid 10-15 lbs every cycle....

adam

Bump for some answers...I've wondered the same thing.
 
Nope. EQ is redundant. Best cycle would be Test Prop, Winny Inject, Tren and Dbol. Dbol reduces hunger actually, use a good anti-e and bam, best gains of any combo.
 
PDP said:
Nope. EQ is redundant. Best cycle would be Test Prop, Winny Inject, Tren and Dbol. Dbol reduces hunger actually, use a good anti-e and bam, best gains of any combo.

how is eq redundant?
 
Pretty much what I was wondering. Yeah, test and winny in the absence of a nice joint supporter like EQ is certainly better than an test/eq/tren cycle. whatever.
 
PDP said:
Nope. EQ is redundant. Best cycle would be Test Prop, Winny Inject, Tren and Dbol. Dbol reduces hunger actually, use a good anti-e and bam, best gains of any combo.

Or so he reads that is.

Bam?????? What............ are you making redundant cannolies?
 
Last edited:
By the way Adam, I think Prop/Tren/EQ is the ultimate base as well.

My personal D-day is April 1st.......and thats the core of my run.
 
One a you bros mind giving a sample cycle with those drugs? Got some prop and EQ, used with some AD in the past, but havent tried tren yet...maybe ill throw it in this time 'round. Gimme some ideas....thanks
 
ren said:
is test, tren, EQ the best and only cycle youll ever need...we all know that diet is everything so if youre cutting....its perfect....if youre bulking...its perfect.....seems to me thats a solid 10-15 lbs every cycle....

adam
For starters, if you enjoy getting a "hard on" at the appropriate times, kiss that goodbye....both tren and eq will affect your libido....use one or the other...it is kinda like taking dbol and anadrol at the same time...both end up with nearly the same results.
 
ren said:
is test, tren, EQ the best and only cycle youll ever need...we all know that diet is everything so if youre cutting....its perfect....if youre bulking...its perfect.....seems to me thats a solid 10-15 lbs every cycle....

adam
Its my favorite. Except I add winstrol in the summer and dbol in the winter.
 
MASSIVE1000 said:
For starters, if you enjoy getting a "hard on" at the appropriate times, kiss that goodbye....both tren and eq will affect your libido....use one or the other...it is kinda like taking dbol and anadrol at the same time...both end up with nearly the same results.

That's what the test is for, well that's not all it's for but you get the point.

Everyone is different but if you iron out your proportions (for me at least 30% more test than tren) libido will be solid. Actually my girlfriend would tell you solid is not a strong enough term. But we are all different.

EQ and Tren do not offer the same results.......well I guess all of them offer the same results in some senses......more and harder muscle. Still they offer different benefits and do so via different mechanisms.
 
Nice cycle

Got to keep it up though!!!What do you bros. think of Test, deca, D-bol, and Proviron, (plus a little Noval), Keepin the test at almost twice the deca.
So far this seems to keep little Elvis at attention!! LOL ( may switch deca to tren later) But I like the Proviron thru out. What do you boys think?
GB :cool:
 
graybass said:
Got to keep it up though!!!What do you bros. think of Test, deca, D-bol, and Proviron, (plus a little Noval), Keepin the test at almost twice the deca.
So far this seems to keep little Elvis at attention!! LOL ( may switch deca to tren later) But I like the Proviron thru out. What do you boys think?
GB :cool:


Deca scares me, but to each their own.
 
occam said:
EQ and Tren do not offer the same results.......well I guess all of them offer the same results in some senses......more and harder muscle. Still they offer different benefits and do so via different mechanisms.

That's pretty much what I was going to say.
 
"Keepin the test at almost twice the deca.
So far this seems to keep little Elvis at attention!!'

This is not the first time that I came across the idea that sexual performance depends on the relative amount of test and not the absolute amount. I'm not being critical, I'm just curious.
 
Back
Top