Low Test, Moderate/High NPP

[Jpmerr2021]

For those of you who have done this and bulked successfully, I would be interested to hear your experiences.

If we can leave out the Deca dick responses, not everybody gets Deca dick (easily managed by adding DHT anyway) I am more interested in hearing from those who have made good gains.

Thinking of jumping on 200 Test, 200 Mast (for the DHT) and 400 NPP, I have always always ran test higher then NPP/Deca but I am reading more and more about less bloat/sides with lower test and it’s tempting me.

I aromatise like a bitch, luckily I had Gyno surgery in the past so have no glands now but managing my E2 can be such a fucking headache that I am starting to really enjoy lower test cycles - My last cut was on low test and high Tren and although I had the usual Tren sides, the absence of sides from high test was very much noticed and appreciated.

So yeah, can I make strong gains on this cycle??? Do not want to waste a blast if higher test is necessary for decent gains you know.

Cheers

 

[JC Grifter]

I had great gains on test 100mg Deca 400mg. Got thick, full, and mostly kept my abs. I keep test low because I aromatize heavy and don’t live in a state where I can get my own bloodwork.

I’m sure the gains would have been even better with higher test. It was still definitely worth the blast.

As far as the gyno surgery, double check with your surgeon that he actually removed the entire gland. For the most part they will not do that due to increased chance of saucer deformity. They leave some of the gland in to avoid that happening. Don’t assume you’re gyno-proof.

 

[Habib]

I used 400 test and 300 deca. Threw in some Tbol. One thing I can say about nandrolone is that it increases your appetite! Be careful not to over eat! I aromatised heavy and used caber but still got deca dick (I know you said not to mention it but it's my personal experience). 200mg Test, 400mg NPP is a great cycle.

 

[effiffoff]

I had great gains on test 100mg Deca 400mg. Got thick, full, and mostly kept my abs. I keep test low because I aromatize heavy and don’t live in a state where I can get my own bloodwork.

I’m sure the gains would have been even better with higher test. It was still definitely worth the blast.

As far as the gyno surgery, double check with your surgeon that he actually removed the entire gland. For the most part they will not do that due to increased chance of saucer deformity. They leave some of the gland in to avoid that happening. Don’t assume you’re gyno-proof.

My gyno came back after having a surgery at age 18. (11 years)
Looks better tho as its smaller than was at young age and my pec grew a bit so the illusion is better.

 

[ConfusedAF]

For those of you who have done this and bulked successfully, I would be interested to hear your experiences.

If we can leave out the Deca dick responses, not everybody gets Deca dick (easily managed by adding DHT anyway) I am more interested in hearing from those who have made good gains.

Thinking of jumping on 200 Test, 200 Mast (for the DHT) and 400 NPP, I have always always ran test higher then NPP/Deca but I am reading more and more about less bloat/sides with lower test and it’s tempting me.

I aromatise like a bitch, luckily I had Gyno surgery in the past so have no glands now but managing my E2 can be such a fucking headache that I am starting to really enjoy lower test cycles - My last cut was on low test and high Tren and although I had the usual Tren sides, the absence of sides from high test was very much noticed and appreciated.

So yeah, can I make strong gains on this cycle??? Do not want to waste a blast if higher test is necessary for decent gains you know.

Cheers

I'm thinking of doing 200 Test, 200 Primo, and 400 NPP. Wouldn't Primo be a better choice than Mast, since it would most likely lower you E2 instead of only masking high E2 symptoms? Especially if you have a hard time controlling E2 and gyno history.

 

[CooSee]

I'm thinking of doing 200 Test, 200 Primo, and 400 NPP. Wouldn't Primo be a better choice than Mast, since it would most likely lower you E2 instead of only masking high E2 symptoms? Especially if you have a hard time controlling E2 and gyno history.

I think you're right with primo and actual E2 levels. Also I think primo is on average more anabolic for people than mast (my experience and have heard it many places). Primo way more expensive esp. for pharma so maybe that's the thinking

 

[ConfusedAF]

I think you're right with primo and actual E2 levels. Also I think primo is on average more anabolic for people than mast (my experience and have heard it many places). Primo way more expensive esp. for pharma so maybe that's the thinking

Agreed, even I considered UGL Primo and NPP quite expensive, compared to Test and Deca.

 

[FortyFiveLbs]

Sry to reignite an old thread, but how has this played out for you?

I am planning my next blast and my goal is to keep bulking as my cut has been going nicely since finishing my first cycle (500mg Test-E), currently cruising on 150mg.

I’m a high aromatizer as well, but the only side I get heavily affected by is acne.

I am planning to run-

400mg Test-E
200mg NPP

Aromasin and Caber will be on hand as well.

If it’s worth it in terms of negating sides I would consider running a comparable cycle to yours.

 

[jJjburton]

Sry to reignite an old thread, but how has this played out for you?

I am planning my next blast and my goal is to keep bulking as my cut has been going nicely since finishing my first cycle (500mg Test-E), currently cruising on 150mg.

I’m a high aromatizer as well, but the only side I get heavily affected by is acne.

I am planning to run-

400mg Test-E
200mg NPP

Aromasin and Caber will be on hand as well.

If it’s worth it in terms of negating sides I would consider running a comparable cycle to yours.

I run test at 350 and npp at 400-600 works well everytime