Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks manthe insulin should be added in based on high postprandial blood glucose due to high carbs, not just thrown in then carbs to cover it.
test and mast 1:1 always works for me. You may run into low e2 symptoms on 1:1 test:eq or you may not. I’d suggest starting eq lower than test just in case and then ramping up if everything feels great after a few weeks
Even with the GH you may not need insulin, how many carbs are you eating post workout? And what does your bg look like an hour after you eat?Thanks man
Makes sense on insulin part but I’m using 5iu GH as well
Ran primo cycle before and hated it .
Even with the GH you may not need insulin, how many carbs are you eating post workout? And what does your bg look like an hour after you eat?
Two time i ran it felt exhausted and above all PIPBoth are fine options, can't really go wrong with test and mast. Simple, predictable, cheat, relatively side effects free.
Nothing wrong with EQ at all for a growth phase, especially if you're one of the people that gets the appetite boost from it.
My question is with this.
Why? What did you hate about it?
I'm a very big fan of primo and it's included in pretty much every one of my cycles.
Have you ever tried primo e? And how did your bloodwork look those two times?Two time i ran it felt exhausted and above all PIP
Yeah primo e 100,Blood work was fine except for low e2Have you ever tried primo e? And how did your bloodwork look those two times?
Primo and EQ are totally different mechanisms that effect e2. EQ doesn't tend to drop it nearly as aggressively as primo, as you're just prioritizing e1 over e2 aromitization rather than outright blocking it.if you got low e2 feels from primo you shouldnt touch EQ
also you should do insulin pre workout instead of post
i did not say the mechanisms were the same, i actually implied that they were different.Primo and EQ are totally different mechanisms that effect e2. EQ doesn't tend to drop it nearly as aggressively as primo, as you're just prioritizing e1 over e2 aromitization rather than outright blocking it.
i did not say the mechanisms were the same, i actually implied that they were different.
From what I see, generally EQ lowers estrogen more than primo on a mg to mg basis.
regardless,
my point was that if he was already prone to having low estrogen (aka not aromatizing alot), why would he run another compound known for lowering estrogen??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
or did you just want an excuse to drop that little e1 e2 tidbit factoid, that you don't understand the context of, just to look smart on the internet
i did not say the mechanisms were the same, i actually implied that they were different.
From what I see, generally EQ lowers estrogen more than primo on a mg to mg basis.
regardless,
my point was that if he was already prone to having low estrogen (aka not aromatizing alot), why would he run another compound known for lowering estrogen??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
or did you just want an excuse to drop that little e1 e2 tidbit factoid, that you don't understand the context of, just to look smart on the internet
Doing eq and test at a 1:1 ratio when he already crashed himself with primo is not a good idea."If you get low e2 from primo, you shouldn't touch e2," is an objectively stupid statement. Primo has nothing to do with rate of aromatization, just outright blocking it.
Go back to Discord and throw your Tantrums there when someone challenges a statement. Weren't you the one talking about slipping your dad Cheque drops? Lmao...