RED
New Member
has anyone ever ran a pct with just nolvadex? I've herd that clomid can pop up as a false negative or whatever it's called on a piss test
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Clomid is much more important during PCT than Nolvadex. The point of PCT is to restart your natural test production, which not only reduces the chances of long term issues, but also maximizes the gains you will keep post cycle. Nolvadex is an estrogen antagonist. It does not actually lower E2 levels, but blocks the receptors and prevents E2 related sides that may occur from fluctuations in test levels during PCT. Nolvadex does nothing to kickstart your body producing its own testosterone again. Test production is stimulated by Luteinizing Hormone. Clomid causes your body to produce LH, and therefore gets your body producing test again on its own. The quicker your body produces its own test after you remove synthetic test, the more gains you keep post cycle. I would suggest including Clomid in your PCT.
Clomid is much more important during PCT than Nolvadex. The point of PCT is to restart your natural test production, which not only reduces the chances of long term issues, but also maximizes the gains you will keep post cycle. Nolvadex is an estrogen antagonist. It does not actually lower E2 levels, but blocks the receptors and prevents E2 related sides that may occur from fluctuations in test levels during PCT. Nolvadex does nothing to kickstart your body producing its own testosterone again. Test production is stimulated by Luteinizing Hormone. Clomid causes your body to produce LH, and therefore gets your body producing test again on its own. The quicker your body produces its own test after you remove synthetic test, the more gains you keep post cycle. I would suggest including Clomid in your PCT.
Well you learn something new everyday! I appreciate the correction.I hate to be the bearer of bad news but nolva most certainly does increase LH. Nolvadex is a mixed agonist and antagonist depending on the tissue in question.
Well you learn something new everyday! I appreciate the correction.
Thank you for the clarification. I try not to comment on things I don't know about, but it is amazing how many things you read from supposed reputable sources that are simply incorrect. Which is why it is great to have resources like yourself around here.No problem. I believe one increases the amplitude of LH secretion while the other increases the frequency. They both have their place in a proper PCT
Thank you for the clarification. I try not to comment on things I don't know about, but it is amazing how many things you read from supposed reputable sources that are simply incorrect. Which is why it is great to have resources like yourself around here.
Clomid is much more important during PCT than Nolvadex. The point of PCT is to restart your natural test production, which not only reduces the chances of long term issues, but also maximizes the gains you will keep post cycle. Nolvadex is an estrogen antagonist. It does not actually lower E2 levels, but blocks the receptors and prevents E2 related sides that may occur from fluctuations in test levels during PCT. Nolvadex does nothing to kickstart your body producing its own testosterone again. Test production is stimulated by Luteinizing Hormone. Clomid causes your body to produce LH, and therefore gets your body producing test again on its own. The quicker your body produces its own test after you remove synthetic test, the more gains you keep post cycle. I would suggest including Clomid in your PCT.
Well you learn something new everyday! I appreciate the correction.
No worries man. I was in the band in high school. I have a thick skin. Appreciate your comment though.Sorry man!! I'm just impatient today. I should've read the whole thread. No need to correct someone twice. My apologies
I've had to readjust my view on several things. Learning never ends. I just try to make sure my references are reliable and objective sources, preferably peer reviewed and replicated studies. Then the issue becomes how applicable the results of a study are to a specific population and misinterpreting results to reach false conclusions or validate confirmation bias....DR. Scally, dr. Jim, and many others are good at doing this