Purplepanda Labs Test Propionate Raw Powder test results

[Gorillag]

Posting up for all thinking or that have recently. I sent a sample off to analyzer1 for him to tes the raw material. Ordered and shipped to the UK this month.

Pleased to say the results were a purity of >99% so spot on with very little if any impurities.

He stated
"There are no organic impurities like hormones, intermediates, decomposition products or other small organic molecules. I can not detect traces of heavy metals yet, I will provide this type of testing in short time probably. However if there would be some higher amounts of heavy metals I would see it."

 

[ickyrica]

Thank you for the post.

You've been around a while but not that many posts. Interesting...

 

[Gorillag]

B

Thank you for the post.

You've been around a while but not that many posts. Interesting...

Been around a very long time but just starting to get interested again due to running some TRT now and prop is better at controlling levels. Joined before board got an upgrade so before 2003 I doubt there's many people left here now.

 

[grey]

Appreciate the share....

 

[ickyrica]

B


Been around a very long time but just starting to get interested again due to running some TRT now and prop is better at controlling levels. Joined before board got an upgrade so before 2003 I doubt there's many people left here now.

Thank you for clarifying. I'm a big fan of PPL but am still always on the lookout for fake posts and profiles regardless of what lab I like ATM. Welcome back

 

[Rockclimber]

Thanks! I love PPL test prop, glad to see its as pure as they advertise.

 

[Mayne]

Appreciated, you paid a lot of money testing a rather cheap compound I am happy you came back with stellar purity at least for peace of mind, may I ask if you did bloods to compare since this is basically pharma quality

 

[Gorillag]

Not started yet will decide. Cheaper for me to test the raws than get the bloodwork done.

I also have some HGH getting tested so once available will post that as well not from purplepanda

Also like to know what I am injecting old school when pharma used to be more readily available.

 

[master.on]

Posting up for all thinking or that have recently. I sent a sample off to analyzer1 for him to tes the raw material. Ordered and shipped to the UK this month.

Pleased to say the results were a purity of >99% so spot on with very little if any impurities.

He stated
"There are no organic impurities like hormones, intermediates, decomposition products or other small organic molecules. I can not detect traces of heavy metals yet, I will provide this type of testing in short time probably. However if there would be some higher amounts of heavy metals I would see it."

That's total BS
even pharmacopeia grade gear (USP/EP) has some tiny amounts of intermediates left.
http://jpdb.nihs.go.jp/jp14e/14data/Part-I/Testosterone_Propionate.pdf

Pharmacopeia monongraphs (entries for each substance) went to great extent to set testing methods, identified common intermediates/residues left and their acceptance limits.

Jano = Mr. Shady

 

[AnTabolic73]

That's total BS
even pharmacopeia grade gear (USP/EP) has some tiny amounts of intermediates left.
http://jpdb.nihs.go.jp/jp14e/14data/Part-I/Testosterone_Propionate.pdf

Pharmacopeia monongraphs (entries for each substance) went to great extent to set testing methods, identified common intermediates/residues left and their acceptance limits.

Jano = Mr. Shady

Who said anything about @jano

 

[janoshik]

1. Well, I don't think that most of master.on says is worth reacting to. He obviously lacks basic reading comprehension.

2. You can clearly notice that there indeed is an impurity - page 2, right on 26th minute (zoom in a lot) and at 210 nm at page 4 at 5.75 minutes.

3. The fact that nothing will be impurity-less at any time is absolute truth and the reason why I don't write anything but 98%+ as the highest purity rating on my result sheets, as it's rather not possible in routine testing to get results more accurate.

 

[Gorillag]

I actually didn't take the statement to mean it was pure 100% the question I was asking was is there a bunch of crap mixed in with it. I think the answer is there isn't so whether it's 98% or 99% for our purposes it probably doesn't make any difference.