research- please read :)

moralanimal

New Member
Hey Bros,
As some of you know, I am a forensic psychologist. We have all experienced the effects of societal views on AAS use. It is stigmatizing and has what I would consider unfair legal ramifications. The current psychological research and literature on the topic is skewed and bias. Quantities for personal use as well as the addictive potential and resulting scheduling are not factual.
I would like to do my part in changing this and need others help (actually everyones). I am looking to publish along with 2 colleges (a psychiatrist and a lawyer) a different view that is more reality based. Between the 3 of us we have already obtained 163 self report surveys. To obtain the statistic power necessary we need a minimum of 500 subjects. This is where your cooperation comes in.
The study would require filling out a web based survey on an independent page. No identifying data (name, residence, etc.) would be asked or should be given with the expectation of age, gender, level of education and SES. This is in no way tied to any law enforcement.
What I can offer in return. 1) Published norms of personal use printed in a well respected journal (I have ties to what is considered the gold standard journal in the area this would fall under). This will benefit you, should you get popped (e.g. 100 d-bol is not an excessive amount and should not be used as the basis for intent to distribute, etc.). 2) AAS use does not fit the current models of addiction and is improperly scheduled. I have a hypothesis on this and would rather not disclose it at this point until findings are published. What I can say is with the 163 subjects already obtained it fits very nicely. 3) Not to be the bad guy but some do develop a problem and the current treatment modalities will be less then effective. This will cause further problems down the road and can serve to help those who need it.
Understandably, many will be nervous. What I would like to understand is how many would be wiling to participate? Thanks in advance for your cooperation.
 
i willing to hear you out and participate once i find out a little more about the study. hit me up bro. getdiesel@hush.com

moralanimal said:
Hey Bros,
As some of you know, I am a forensic psychologist. We have all experienced the effects of societal views on AAS use. It is stigmatizing and has what I would consider unfair legal ramifications. The current psychological research and literature on the topic is skewed and bias. Quantities for personal use as well as the addictive potential and resulting scheduling are not factual.
I would like to do my part in changing this and need others help (actually everyones). I am looking to publish along with 2 colleges (a psychiatrist and a lawyer) a different view that is more reality based. Between the 3 of us we have already obtained 163 self report surveys. To obtain the statistic power necessary we need a minimum of 500 subjects. This is where your cooperation comes in.
The study would require filling out a web based survey on an independent page. No identifying data (name, residence, etc.) would be asked or should be given with the expectation of age, gender, level of education and SES. This is in no way tied to any law enforcement.
What I can offer in return. 1) Published norms of personal use printed in a well respected journal (I have ties to what is considered the gold standard journal in the area this would fall under). This will benefit you, should you get popped (e.g. 100 d-bol is not an excessive amount and should not be used as the basis for intent to distribute, etc.). 2) AAS use does not fit the current models of addiction and is improperly scheduled. I have a hypothesis on this and would rather not disclose it at this point until findings are published. What I can say is with the 163 subjects already obtained it fits very nicely. 3) Not to be the bad guy but some do develop a problem and the current treatment modalities will be less then effective. This will cause further problems down the road and can serve to help those who need it.
Understandably, many will be nervous. What I would like to understand is how many would be wiling to participate? Thanks in advance for your cooperation.
 
Thanks for the support. I really appreciate it more then you realize. I was a bit concerned that participants would be skeptical; thanks for your trust. I am meeting with a web guy on Tuesday to see the damage of setting up the webpage (no grant money for this one :( ) and will get back to everyone. Hopefully we will all benefit from this.
As far as the legal stuff goes- BigK, that is your area. I am not an expert like yourself but one of the goals is to publish findings that can be used in court as a defense. It should, at least in theory, make it more difficult to convict someone of intent to distribute when it really possession. I am more then open to any feedback you have.
Thanks again- this means a lot to me. Again, I realy think this will serve all of us.
 
I would participate

I would respond to your questionaire, It might shock just a few people to see (IMHO) just how far off base their perceptions of AAS users actually is. Im 55, ex-marine, MBA from a major School, married, 2 children, professional. Definately part of the Middle class LOL.
 
I would be inetrested email me at deacon@cyber-rights.net


also on the topic of distribution it is generally not the amount per se - but also the presence of packaging materials - scales - customer names addys etc
it takes more than just amount to prove distributorship most times - unless of course it is an ungodly amount of drug.
Dont want to start any arguments here but felt this should be thrown into the conversation
 
Back
Top