Threshold Necessary To Cause Positive Results On A Lab Max Test.

[sloganslimms]

I know that Lab max can let us know whether a substance is present in whatever we are testing, but at what amount is necessary to cause a positive test result. For example: let's say I have 250mg test e per ml (according to the bottle)... how much actual test is needed to cause a positive test result? I just got through with what I assume was a garbage dosed cycle of sciroxx gear and am debating buying a lab max kit. There was some gear in what I ran... but my results were garbage. No increased libido, no oily skin, some strength gains, no real weight gain that couldn't have been produced without gear, plus it shut me down for f'in nothing... soooooo pissed off. $600 waste. F#*k sciroxx.... word to the wise.

 

[sloganslimms]

Bump.... no one???

 

[micro2000]

If I remember correctly, their website says it can detect as low as 0.3 mg.

 

[Notits]

how much are were you eating, and WHAT were you eating on cycle? what did your mid and post cycle blood work show?

 

[sloganslimms]

how much are were you eating, and WHAT were you eating on cycle? what did your mid and post cycle blood work show?

I have to admit, notits... my diet was not perfect (+-32-3600/day). But i actually lost weight from this cycle. Getting bloods this week (had to wait 6 weeks after pct) and didn't get mid bloods because I already knew it was underdosed. Didn't need bloods to tell me that. I only weigh 200 lbs. Surely I should've made some gains, even without 4-5000 calories a day. My protein was on point though. 2-48g shakes a day and tons of meat. I'm around 15% bf so I was going for a lean bulk. I have noticeable obliques but just can't seem to pull off the coveted 6 pack abs, so I didn't want to put on unwanted fat. Am I approaching this all wrong? I use My fitness pal which is f'in awesome at keeping track of diet. I ate eggs and oats almost every day for breakfast. Just sucked getting shut down for basically no gains. Sciroxx sucks... they even shorted me on my order and never made right on it. Don't recommend... Karl is a scammer and a thief.

 

[sloganslimms]

If I remember correctly, their website says it can detect as low as 0.3 mg.

So, what ur saying is it takes next to nothing to show a positive result? Am I the only one that sees the problem with this?

 

[micro2000]

It is a limitation of qualitative methods. It's possible to design a semi-quantitative method using this kit and the lower level of detection but it would increase the number of kits needed for every test.

 

[mercury]

if you go to their web site, they explain everything. it says there that it is not for testing potency.

but on other hand they show that different test enen will react in different way, from yellow for very low concentration to some blue and nice blue - greenish glow all over the vial if the concentration is high.

I am not sure about the rest of the gear.

 

[Dr JIM]

Although the LM site fails to list any references for their commentary, I believe it's relatively straightforward and well worth a review for ANY ONE using LM. Primarily bc they clearly define the limitations and usefulness of LM as a reagent assay! And that makes the commentary much more credible IMO.
JIM