Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not bad. Tough to dial in the dose if your using caps.
I assume we are looking at test results for ~50 mg anavar. it says qualitative and quantitative and then shows the results.What are we looking at? At first glance it looks like jano just weighed the capsules....why is this not a purity test?
The test is showing the compound and amount of the compound in each capsule.What are we looking at? At first glance it looks like jano just weighed the capsules....why is this not a purity test?
100%. The HPLC test determines the amount of a compound in a given sample.So what is the quality of the anavar? Whats the point of the test if it doesnt do that
It does. It says how's mg are actually in the supposed 50mg caps.So what is the quality of the anavar? Whats the point of the test if it doesnt do that
A majority of his raws were 98+ pure. I think his winny or something tested lower.Ive never heard of a source having pure anything let alone anavar..
Thats a seperate test....ordered by the source...
The test showing the purity was a test of the raws. This test is of the capsule mixed and is how much anavar is in each capsule.T
Thats a seperate test....ordered by the source...
You still making assumptions about purity and no way its 100% and if it is it should still be notified as suchThe test showing the purity was a test of the raws. This test is of the capsule mixed and is how much anavar is in each capsule.
No raws are ever pure. What I’m saying is that HPLC testing detects the amount of actual compound in a given sample, so the purity of the raws is irrelevant. The result will reflect the impurity because the quantitative analysis will return a lower amount of the compound from the sample if it’s less pure.Ive never heard of a source having pure anything let alone anavar..
This^No raws are ever pure. What I’m saying is that HPLC testing detects the amount of actual compound in a given sample, so the purity of the raws is irrelevant. The result will reflect the impurity because the quantitative analysis will return a lower amount of the compound from the sample if it’s less pure.
If the raws are, say, 98% pure, and the source managed to theoretically get their dosing perfect but didn’t account for the impurity, you’d get a result of 49mg of var. The worse your raws are, the further off that number will be.
That’s why raw testing is so important: if you know what the level of impurity is in your API before you do your calculations, you can account for it and add extra raws to make up the difference.
So we still dont know if its a purity or dosing/mixing issue...No raws are ever pure. What I’m saying is that HPLC testing detects the amount of actual compound in a given sample, so the purity of the raws is irrelevant. The result will reflect the impurity because the quantitative analysis will return a lower amount of the compound from the sample if it’s less pure.
If the raws are, say, 98% pure, and the source managed to theoretically get their dosing perfect but didn’t account for the impurity, you’d get a result of 49mg of var. The worse your raws are, the further off that number will be.
That’s why raw testing is so important: if you know what the level of impurity is in your API before you do your calculations, you can account for it and add extra raws to make up the difference.
It’s 100% a dosing/mixing issue assuming that the raws were tested beforehand.So we still dont know if its a purity or dosing/mixing issue...