Various Jano test results - one shocker

Redartudies

New Member
Got some test results today. One is quite alarming, the supposed Primo from XT-Labs in Mexico.

- QSC Var - 80mg
- QSC Mast - 100mg
- QSC Test C - 250mg
- QSC Primo - 100mg
- Evolve Biolabs Var - 10mg
- Evolve Biolabs Primo - 100 mg
XT Labs Primo - NOT PRIMO
 

Attachments

  • Primo Mex.webp
    Primo Mex.webp
    92.5 KB · Views: 193
  • Primo India.webp
    Primo India.webp
    92.1 KB · Views: 189
  • primo.webp
    primo.webp
    92.4 KB · Views: 170
  • Q Var 80mg.webp
    Q Var 80mg.webp
    90.4 KB · Views: 162
  • mast.webp
    mast.webp
    91.5 KB · Views: 152
  • Evolve Var.webp
    Evolve Var.webp
    91.6 KB · Views: 149
  • test.webp
    test.webp
    93.2 KB · Views: 186
Got some test results today. One is quite alarming, the supposed Primo from XT-Labs in Mexico.

- QSC Var - 80mg
- QSC Mast - 100mg
- QSC Test C - 250mg
- QSC Primo - 100mg
- Evolve Biolabs Var - 10mg
- Evolve Biolabs Primo - 100 mg
XT Labs Primo - NOT PRIMO
QSC testC is the latest batch? (blue cap)
 
Got some test results today. One is quite alarming, the supposed Primo from XT-Labs in Mexico.
I see that you've redacted the client name and the unique verification key.

By blocking the verification key, you make it impossible to verify the legitimacy of the @janoshik reports. This is not good.

If you did this to protect your anonymity, ask Jano to change the client name to something anonymous or pseudonymous like Redartudies. In the future, avoid using real names, email addresses, or anything that can be linked to you IRL when providing "client name".

By doing this, you don't have to redact anything, preserve your pseudonymity, and make it possible for the tests to be independently verified.
 
I see that you've redacted the client name and the unique verification key.

By blocking the verification key, you make it impossible to verify the legitimacy of the @janoshik reports. This is not good.

If you did this to protect your anonymity, ask Jano to change the client name to something anonymous or pseudonymous like Redartudies. In the future, avoid using real names, email addresses, or anything that can be linked to you IRL when providing "client name".

By doing this, you don't have to redact anything, preserve your pseudonymity, and make it possible for the tests to be independently verified.
No sense share a fake test lol , i think he put name in the test....
 
I see that you've redacted the client name and the unique verification key.

By blocking the verification key, you make it impossible to verify the legitimacy of the @janoshik reports. This is not good.

If you did this to protect your anonymity, ask Jano to change the client name to something anonymous or pseudonymous like Redartudies. In the future, avoid using real names, email addresses, or anything that can be linked to you IRL when providing "client name".

By doing this, you don't have to redact anything, preserve your pseudonymity, and make it possible for the tests to be independently verified.
Correct in assuming that I was seeking to remain anonymous. I can both ask Jano to change the name, and I can share the original test directly with any tenured member here if they have any concerns
 
Correct in assuming that I was seeking to remain anonymous. I can both ask Jano to change the name, and I can share the original test directly with any tenured member here if they have any concerns
Thank you for taking the time to submit the samples and share the results. It is appreciated.

I don't have any concerns here and @janoshik is good at exposing fraudulent reports.

I just want to promote best practices for everyone who shares independent lab test results.

One of the most important practices is transparency. By avoiding the alteration, modification, or cropping of lab reports especially when it comes to things like the verification key or order number, everyone can transparently, instantly and independently verify the legitimacy on Jano's website without requiring the involvement of any other "trusted" or "tenured" members.
 
Don't buy Indian underground anabolics.(Pharma is fine)
I agree. It can be hard to determine what’s ugl and what’s pharma. Don’t get me wrong some of it is clearly ugl and doesn’t take much looking into to determine that.

Some other products though it’s not straightforward.
 
I agree. It can be hard to determine what’s ugl and what’s pharma. Don’t get me wrong some of it is clearly ugl and doesn’t take much looking into to determine that.

Some other products though it’s not straightforward.
And that's my concern - what is true Pharma? XT Labs portray themselves as "pharma" in Mexico, yet they're clearly a very questionable operation
 
Back
Top