Why you should not frontload

Blange89

Well-known Member
AnabolicLab.com Supporter
Code:
https://www.bluelight.org/xf/threads/%E2%AB%B8why-you-should-not-frontload%E2%AB%B7.802044/

Dont know if you guys have seen this, thought I would share.
 
Why are you quoting from Bluelight? Do you not know that is a recreational drug site? What do those people really know about AAS?
 
Why are you quoting from Bluelight? Do you not know that is a recreational drug site? What do those people really know about AAS?

Steroids are drugs, which are used illicitly mostly for recreational purposes like non competitive bodybuilding. BL is a site dedicated to illicit drug use. Makes sense there would be a section over there on the illicit use of roids. Do I need to say illicit again or is that enough
 
That was a long write up that I skimmed mostly...
Although I don’t know the scientific reasonings behind whether to front load or not I will say that I personally believe it’s just a waste of gear!
I’ve front loaded once and I don’t for a second believe I grew more or noticed any kind of difference than a normal cycle.
Well other than wasting gear... :D
 
The point of frontloading is not more growth qua growth, it’s to reach peak levels faster and thus have a more sustained amount of time at the specific level. Almost everything in that write up was wrong, which considering how long it was is truly impressive. It would have saved me time if he had just titled it “I don’t know how esters or half lives work”.
 
The point of frontloading is not more growth qua growth, it’s to reach peak levels faster and thus have a more sustained amount of time at the specific level. Almost everything in that write up was wrong, which considering how long it was is truly impressive. It would have saved me time if he had just titled it “I don’t know how esters or half lives work”.
I agree with you and that’s why most people want to do it, but also because they may think more gear equals more growth. But why not just extend the cycle a bit longer to reach the same outcome?
On paper this idea might seem like a good one, but for me anyway, it’s a total waste. What looks good on paper doesn’t always carry over into real life experience and experiments with cycles imo.
I’m just making conversation bro. I don’t want you to think I’m being a dick or anything like that lol. ;)
This has been a topic that I’m sure a lot of people have either wondered about or have tried. Just putting my take on it is all. :)
 
I agree with you and that’s why most people want to do it, but also because they may think more gear equals more growth. But why not just extend the cycle a bit longer to reach the same outcome?
On paper this idea might seem like a good one, but for me anyway, it’s a total waste. What looks good on paper doesn’t always carry over into real life experience and experiments with cycles imo.
I’m just making conversation bro. I don’t want you to think I’m being a dick or anything like that lol. ;)
This has been a topic that I’m sure a lot of people have either wondered about or have tried. Just putting my take on it is all. :)

Totally agree. I imagine it could be justified for certain esters, but even so I think going longer makes more sense. My quibble was with how the original piece was written. I’ve lurked here for years and rarely speak up because I have less experiential and more theoretical/analytical knowledge. But this one I could not let slip without commentary.
 
Totally agree. I imagine it could be justified for certain esters, but even so I think going longer makes more sense. My quibble was with how the original piece was written. I’ve lurked here for years and rarely speak up because I have less experiential and more theoretical/analytical knowledge. But this one I could not let slip without commentary.
Participate more man! I think all sides are great for readers. :D
 
I see the benefit of front loading versus cycle extension potentially having to do with reaching peak plasma levels before myostatin levels increase. If you reach full saturation levels three days faster is that really going to make that much of a difference though? I guess I could see it more beneficial if you are using long esters but in my opinion not much of a need with short esters. Like I said though that is just my speculation and in no way a scientific response.
 
Back
Top