Why is CNN airing Isis video over and over

The plot thickens:


No it doesn't.

You left enough info in your post that I was able to locate your source (you're always too embarrassed to post your sources for some reason, Kawilt :rolleyes:).

The article itself is from The Fars News Agency, a mouthpiece for Iran's mullahs, and certainly not a trustworthy news source. These are the same clowns that ran a story claiming US Security policy is being driven by "Tall White Aliens" that the US inherited from Adolf Hitler. LMFAO

The blog you took the article from - The Saker - is typical of the pro Russian, anti-Western, anti-Israel moon bats you're known for reading. This Saker clown's 2014 man of the year was the Russian soldier!

I must say, Kawilt, for someone who professes his love for liberty, you sure seem to have a fetish for tyrants.

So no, the plot doesn't thicken. It's actually looking quite thin. LMFAO

Later, Komrade.
 
LOL CBS. This site is obviously pro Russian. This Saker dude's seems pretty popular all over the world. I browse through pro West news just as much. I keep informed everyday by our press and news sites. But I learned long ago that sometimes a lot is left out. You want to go back in time, say, to just the Eisenhower administration and work your way forward? Go back and see how much was twisted and left out of the news of every major world event during each following administration (Vietnam,Tonkin Bay, JFK assassination, Bangladesh,Contra's, Afghanistan, Iraq) There's a few I left out, but you get my point. This one caught my eye because it mentioned confiscated passports. Well if that's true we should be seeing something more about it soon enough, or maybe nothing at all. You need a program to keep up with all that's going on over there and around the world. Otherwise your being fed pablum by both sides.
Here's a little something from Russian news on about Turkey:
http://sputniknews.com/military/20150306/1019171895.html#ixzz3TdmYuQnC
Your doing yourself a disservice by discounting every news source because of it's origin or author.
con·spir·a·cy
(kən-spîr′ə-sē)
n. pl. con·spir·a·cies
1.
An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.
2. A group of conspirators.
3. Law An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action.
 
LOL CBS. This site is obviously pro Russian. This Saker dude's seems pretty popular all over the world. I browse through pro West news just as much. I keep informed everyday by our press and news sites. But I learned long ago that sometimes a lot is left out. You want to go back in time, say, to just the Eisenhower administration and work your way forward? Go back and see how much was twisted and left out of the news of every major world event during each following administration (Vietnam,Tonkin Bay, JFK assassination, Bangladesh,Contra's, Afghanistan, Iraq) There's a few I left out, but you get my point. This one caught my eye because it mentioned confiscated passports. Well if that's true we should be seeing something more about it soon enough, or maybe nothing at all. You need a program to keep up with all that's going on over there and around the world. Otherwise your being fed pablum by both sides.
Here's a little something from Russian news on about Turkey:
http://sputniknews.com/military/20150306/1019171895.html#ixzz3TdmYuQnC
Your doing yourself a disservice by discounting every news source because of it's origin or author.
con·spir·a·cy
(kən-spîr′ə-sē)
n. pl. con·spir·a·cies
1.
An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.
2. A group of conspirators.
3. Law An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action.

Are you saying that NBC, ABC, CBS, FOX, CNN, MSNBC would lie to us??? Wtf?? Why would they want to keep the truth from us??? And why would they propagate the mantra "yeah right, you cannot believe everything you read on the internet!" Why?
They don't love us? They love corporate money more??

They call it programming for reason folks!
 
Your doing yourself a disservice by discounting every news source because of it's origin or author.

Are you saying that NBC, ABC, CBS, FOX, CNN, MSNBC would lie to us??? Wtf?? Why would they want to keep the truth from us??? And why would they propagate the mantra "yeah right, you cannot believe everything you read on the internet!" Why?
They don't love us? They love corporate money more??

I was standing in line at the supermarket the other day and noticed the National Examiner had a story saying they had proof that Obama was actually the secret love child that was conceived during a sordid affair between Marilyn Monroe and an space alien named Dave from the planet Cryptosporidium .

Do you think I should have bought that paper before the evidence disappears? I'm just thankful for the brave reporters that will report the things the media won't. Aren't you? :rolleyes:
 
I was standing in line at the supermarket the other day and noticed the National Examiner had a story saying they had proof that Obama was actually the secret love child that was conceived during a sordid affair between Marilyn Monroe and an space alien named Dave from the planet Cryptosporidium .

Do you think I should have bought that paper before the evidence disappears? I'm just thankful for the brave reporters that will report the things the media won't. Aren't you? :rolleyes:


Not sure why you copied me to your reply, but naivety is the death of the human race.

If people want to believe the main stream corporate news then they should research their owners/stockholders to discover where the money is coming from. I believe anybody who watches the MSMCorporate News is being sheltered and is the main factor in loosing OUR freedoms and OUR rights everyday.

This is book is a good read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_People's_History_of_the_United_States
http://www.amazon.com/A-Peoples-History-United-States/dp/0060838655

Yeah, I know Howard Zinn came from aliens and worked for the Arab States or something asinine type of response.

Just think CBS, when you wake up too reality, we all will probably be in a world of shit!
 
Not sure why you copied me to your reply, but naivety is the death of the human race.

I copied you because you because you've rejected mainstream media in favor of alternative sources. The Nation Examiner is about as alternative as one can get.

Just think CBS, when you wake up too reality, we all will probably be in a world of shit!

I've got news for you: We're already in a world of shit. The question is what to do about it. Unfortunately, you paranoid conspiracy theorists just confound legitimate efforts to answer that question.
 
I copied you because you because you've rejected mainstream media in favor of alternative sources. The Nation Examiner is about as alternative as one can get.



I've got news for you: We're already in a world of shit. The question is what to do about it. Unfortunately, you paranoid conspiracy theorists just confound legitimate efforts to answer that question.
Just trying to open some eyes, no reason to be a meanie! lol
 
I copied you because you because you've rejected mainstream media in favor of alternative sources. The Nation Examiner is about as alternative as one can get.



Unfortunately, you paranoid conspiracy theorists just confound legitimate efforts to answer that question.
Seriously CBS, do you know who Noam Chomsky is? I don't think anyone with scruples (not saying you don't have them) would equate him with The Nation Examiner.
 
Seriously CBS, do you know who Noam Chomsky is? I don't think anyone with scruples (not saying you don't have them) would equate him with The Nation Examiner.

Chomsky is a paranoid, delusional, disingenuous fraud. So yeah, I would equate Chomsky with the Nation Examiner.

Chomsky's Follies
The professor's pronouncements about Osama Bin Laden are stupid and ignorant.

By Christopher Hitchens

Refuting Chomsky

His defenders say I didn't come up with proof that Noam Chomsky distorts the truth. Here it is.
David Horowitz

http://www.paulbogdanor.com/chomsky/200chomskylies.pdf
Version 2.0
Compiled by Paul Bogdanor

Brad DeLong (June 17, 2002): My Very, Very Allergic Reaction to Noam Chomsky: Khmer Rouge, Faurisson, Milosevic

Chomsky’s Immoral Divestiture Petition
Guest Column
Alan M. Dershowitz



 
Chomsky is a paranoid, delusional, disingenuous fraud. So yeah, I would equate Chomsky with the Nation Examiner.

Chomsky's Follies
The professor's pronouncements about Osama Bin Laden are stupid and ignorant.
By Christopher Hitchens

Refuting Chomsky

His defenders say I didn't come up with proof that Noam Chomsky distorts the truth. Here it is.
David Horowitz

http://www.paulbogdanor.com/chomsky/200chomskylies.pdf
Version 2.0
Compiled by Paul Bogdanor

Brad DeLong (June 17, 2002): My Very, Very Allergic Reaction to Noam Chomsky: Khmer Rouge, Faurisson, Milosevic

Chomsky’s Immoral Divestiture Petition
Guest Column
Alan M. Dershowitz


David Horowitz? hahahahah! Okay man, I see what angle you've been educated on now. Talk about national enquirer material.
 
David Horowitz? hahahahah! Okay man, I see what angle you've been educated on now. Talk about national enquirer material.

Just as I suspected, you conveniently ignored Hitchens and based your objections entirely on Horowitz. FYI, I put Hitch first and in bold for that reason. You see, I've been dealing with you Chomsky fanboys for years and I know how you think - correct that, you don't think, you follow your spiritual leader. Nothing will turn you boys away from your messiah. It's always EVERYBODY else that has to wake up to reality but never you. LMFAO
 
Just as I suspected, you conveniently ignored Hitchens and based your objections entirely on Horowitz. FYI, I put Hitch first and in bold for that reason. You see, I've been dealing with you Chomsky fanboys for years and I know how you think - correct that, you don't think, you follow your spiritual leader. Nothing will turn you boys away from your messiah. It's always EVERYBODY else that has to wake up to reality but never you. LMFAO

Wasn't Dershowitz charged with plagiarism among other things? That'd be 2 down.......
 
Back
Top