I don't see anything wrong with it other than Weston's reviews not being held as valid as it could appear that his review was "bought" or that he will only positively review gear for which he gets special discounts on. A factor which must be considered if his review is to be "valid" as some can argue that he may not provide a good review for gear unless a discount be involved. A practice which he could be selective at.
There is also the possibility of the source giving out "special" gear to the first buyers/discounted offers and those reviews should not be held as "valid" reviews either.
We shouldn't hang
@Weston, just acknowledge that his review is not valid. He jumped on the free/discounted gear train. Those vials could have been "special" perfectly dosed vials. Then the lab goes back to their shady zero Quality Control ways right after some positive reviews of their DISCOUNTED gear.
I personally do not believe that the first issue applies to
@Weston, however, stranger things have happened at Meso.