SST - Shady Mods at the Shit Show

[Tenman2b]

If ever there was doubt about SST, take a look at this thread.
A lot of their sources offer people credit if they have the product tested or post labs on cycle. A mod has admitted now that they wont approve any labs that look bad for a source. They are refusing to give some guy credit because he's on Test and his labs are shit. Looks like the source did the right thing and gave him credit anyways. Mod is saying his software won't allow them to score any bad marks against a source. What a shit show.

Steroid Source Talk

Community platform by XenForo®

steroidsourcetalk.me

 

[T&H]

If ever there was doubt about SST, take a look at this thread.
A lot of their sources offer people credit if they have the product tested or post labs on cycle. A mod has admitted now that they wont approve any labs that look bad for a source. They are refusing to give some guy credit because he's on Test and his labs are shit. Looks like the source did the right thing and gave him credit anyways. Mod is saying his software won't allow them to score any bad marks against a source. What a shit show.

Steroid Source Talk

Community platform by XenForo®

steroidsourcetalk.me

It has to be a 4x or greater. Sounds like because it pushes the source to find out what the problem is, since it could be the gear. Bloodwork can vary anyways, but that is low.

 

[Liska]

Welcome to Meso where we really hate people not reading threads properly, in this case you confusing the store credit sources may give to customers for testing and credit as mod approval of the labwork counting towards the source (required for 'verified' status and stuff) by meeting certain guidelines - these are completely independent of each other as explained by the mod you're unjustly attacking:

"Source credit for bloodwork is not board policy. You keep saying this no matter how many ways I refute. Board policy is the way I review the bloodwork. Credits are a separate matter entirely. Leading to the next point…

Sources DO NOT need my approval to give a credit.

“Approval” of bloodwork means it counts; that would be a positive affirmation of bloodwork for the source."

 

[Villain]

If ever there was doubt about SST, take a look at this thread.
A lot of their sources offer people credit if they have the product tested or post labs on cycle. A mod has admitted now that they wont approve any labs that look bad for a source. They are refusing to give some guy credit because he's on Test and his labs are shit. Looks like the source did the right thing and gave him credit anyways. Mod is saying his software won't allow them to score any bad marks against a source. What a shit show.

Steroid Source Talk

Community platform by XenForo®

steroidsourcetalk.me

SST is definitely a shit show and a joke, even if you did interpret this wrong.

 

[theotherguy]

Nevermind

 

[graciebjj]

If ever there was doubt about SST, take a look at this thread.
A lot of their sources offer people credit if they have the product tested or post labs on cycle. A mod has admitted now that they wont approve any labs that look bad for a source. They are refusing to give some guy credit because he's on Test and his labs are shit. Looks like the source did the right thing and gave him credit anyways. Mod is saying his software won't allow them to score any bad marks against a source. What a shit show.

Steroid Source Talk

Community platform by XenForo®

steroidsourcetalk.me

you're an idiot. The mod is saying he's not adding a point to the source's reputation for bad bloods. Isn't that a good thing? Don't you want:

1. sources being tested and
2. mods explicitly saying "this does not meet satisfactory levels to give the source good boy points" when the results aren't good?

The source put out an incentive for testing, the testing came back underwhelming. A mod said "not a good result, no point awarded to source". It's up to the source to make it right to their client's satisfaction.

 

[superVato]

If ever there was doubt about SST, take a look at this thread.
A lot of their sources offer people credit if they have the product tested or post labs on cycle. A mod has admitted now that they wont approve any labs that look bad for a source. They are refusing to give some guy credit because he's on Test and his labs are shit. Looks like the source did the right thing and gave him credit anyways. Mod is saying his software won't allow them to score any bad marks against a source. What a shit show.

Steroid Source Talk

Community platform by XenForo®

steroidsourcetalk.me

I hang out around SST sometimes and remember seeing this post. Just going to put it out there that AG the source still honored the blood work credit and even has offered to pay for the OP to get bloods retested. I agree it's a little weird but that 2x multiplier is why they handled it so weird.

 

[Tenman2b]

you're an idiot. The mod is saying he's not adding a point to the source's reputation for bad bloods. Isn't that a good thing? Don't you want:

1. sources being tested and
2. mods explicitly saying "this does not meet satisfactory levels to give the source good boy points" when the results aren't good?

The source put out an incentive for testing, the testing came back underwhelming. A mod said "not a good result, no point awarded to source". It's up to the source to make it right to their client's satisfaction.

Sources put out an incentive for testing. To perform bloodwork. Same as the incentive offered for Janoshik testing. Compensation for time/money spent. No where does it say that we will compensate you for your time and money if you make us look good.

Yes you want sources tested. Yes you want no points awarded for poor results.

 

[graciebjj]

Sources put out an incentive for testing. To perform bloodwork. Same as the incentive offered for Janoshik testing. Compensation for time/money spent. No where does it say that we will compensate you for your time and money if you make us look good.

Yes you want sources tested. Yes you want no points awarded for poor results.

So what is your problem with the thread then?? You're getting a source tested, you're getting no points awarded for a poor result. You should be happy, no?