It was only around 90 iu for around a few months. You guys should also remember that my IGF-1 levels are NOT the ones you'd expect from 90 iu:
I'm curious how you got to 90iu. In a later post you mentioned saturation, did your IGF-1 levels continue to climb as you went beyond .1iu/kg?
Is anyone willing to actually contest my IQ claim (WAIS-III test report about me with an IQ score of 133) because I can verify it with this method if anyone's up for it.
I don't have a report from a clinical neuropsychologist at an internationally renowned institution, where it, clear as day, says I was assessed on the WAIS-III and have a "133" score.
Internationally renowned? Sure, maybe, but also unnecessary to administer a simple test. I'm curious why you were tested?
Well, if the doubters put up money in escrow, some small financial benefit may come of it.
For the IQ discussion to be substantive, should we commit to limiting it just to the escrow verification instead of shitslinging because it's not going to be very productive otherwise?
I was curious, but I've lost interest. As I mentioned two standard deviations is possible, three, less so. Your argument about the definition of "few" was in bad faith, however. "Few" is ambiguous and you certainly know this.
Based on your writing, the number your proclaim is plausible, but speaks only to one aspect of the test. That's neither proof nor disproof, just an observation of the fact that I have limited information by which to make a judgment.
The point stands however, proclaiming one's IQ or even indicating that one might be the smartest person in the room rarely goes well. I'm sure you can employ your substantial intellect to communicate what is necessary on the topic with a little more discretion.
Regarding the point where most males saturated around 0.1 iu/kg, and after that point, the change was simply more side effects (which doesn't fit my side effect changes/profile completely), with minimal additional IGF-1 elevation, and the PO I observed after this proposed saturation point, I think we should consider:
Here is where I'm curious. What caused you want to titrate above the theoretical saturation point? Your statement is ambiguous. Are you suggesting that you saw no or marginal increase in IGF-1? What about side effects?
I asked ChatGPT and it thinks his IQ is 126.
As part of an ADHD assessment, I took the WAIS-IV recently. Why that's relevant, to the assessment, I have no idea, but the doc ordered it and I played along out of curiosity. After the test, I described my experience to ChatGPT, where I did well, and at which points I struggled. It returned an estimate of my FSIQ. The number that if offered was very close to the result I received when tested as a teenager. I've yet to see the results of this most recent test, but if it's accurate, that's a curious phenomenon.