The Lobster International, AU, CANADA and EU Domestic HGH, PEPTIDES and Turkish Pharmacy

[Trenbolonetax]

You bitch, I explained to you what that sentence meant. You twisting my words! I'm calling Mama! You wait and see

Sorry bro I must've missed the explanation! I just read the part that said only your passport is Italian.

NO, Sampei! DO NOT CALL MAMA! PLEASE!

 

[Sampei]

Sorry bro I must've missed the explanation! I just read the part that said only your passport is Italian.

NO, Sampei! DO NOT CALL MAMA! PLEASE!
View attachment 318331

You even acknowledge it! What the fuck!

I'm calling grandma too! From the fucking grave, you done brother, you have mama and dead grandma on you now. You gonna be a scrawny little bitch when they are done with you!

1000mg of DNP are nothing compared to the heat you gonna feelzzzzzzz

 

[Trenbolonetax]

You even acknowledge it! What the fuck!

Was I high, or drunk?

I'm calling grandma too! From the fucking grave, you done brother, you have mama and dead grandma on you now. You gonna be a scrawny little bitch when they are done with you!

1000mg of DNP are nothing compared to the heat you gonna feelzzzzzzz

Oh for a second there bro I thought Mama = Mama Iris! You really had me fucked up there for a second!

 

[aljowa]

www.streamable.com/t5lhye

Genuine question: after the initial injection of the bac water, what was the reason for pulling the syringe plunger back and reinjecting multiple times?

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

Genuine question: after the initial injection of the bac water, what was the reason for pulling the syringe plunger back and reinjecting multiple times?

you dont give women a few pumps in after injecting? Virgin much?

 

[AlexDavis43]

Because people go from thread to thread starting shit with claims just off of a study. The situation isn't even replicated in real life.

Such as HGH damage because of lack of vacuum. No testing has been performed to back it up

Challenge the source, that is fine.

BUT to keep attacking them when they are willing to conduct an experiment to determine whether is the product is really defective is idiotic.

This is no longer harm reduction and is now just being annoying.

Especially when you have people fear mongering, stock up on this, stock up on that, de minimus, preaching harm reduction, testing, filtering peptides.

Clearly some of these idiots have purchased raws but

I havent seen them post any tests results for safety of their own product!

Does anyone else see something wrong with this? It's just some moron behind the computer that has nothing else going on!

This is great though. Get the testing done. Stop the speculation (or at least slow it down).

Also respectable that the members who have been very vocal about this volunteered to share the costs.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

This is great though. Get the testing done. Stop the speculation (or at least slow it down).

Also respectable that the members who have been very vocal about this volunteered to share the costs.

I dont understand why they keep egging this conversation on.

Other customers and Source offer to help pay/fully cover. .

Maybe the complainers are right ? Maybe 2 months of no vacuum will do damage? but when we are deciding to put it to rest with real data collection, they keep going.


I swear to god, Embarrassment to harm reduction and testing.

 

[Ghoul]

It's "speculation" that vacuum serves a purpose and its absence is a problem?

It's hard to believe in a forum dedicated to "harm reduction" there are clowns giving vendors cover and putting out the message to members that using them without the assurance the seal hasn't been compromised is acceptable.

These morons, I presume, wouldn't consume a bottle of juice with the safety button popped up, but injecting something similarly compromised is fine?

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

It's "speculation" that vacuum serves a purpose and its absence is a problem?

It's hard to believe in a forum dedicated to "harm reduction" there are clowns giving vendors cover and putting out the message to members that using them without the assurance the seal hasn't been compromised is acceptable.

These morons, I presume, wouldn't consume a bottle of juice with the safety button popped up, but injecting something similarly compromised is fine?

When are you going to do something else rather than post from your computer chair all day? Create hypotheticals instead of putting stuff into action?

Send/post some real stuff for testing or your own Raws you stocked up on.

You are nothing but a big joke.

 

[Ghoul]

I dont understand why they keep egging this conversation on.

Other customers and Source offer to help pay/fully cover. .

Maybe the complainers are right ? Maybe 2 months of no vacuum will do damage? but when we are deciding to put it to rest with real data collection, they keep going.


I swear to god, Embarrassment to harm reduction and testing.

The other purpose for vacuum is to maintain sterility.

A significant number of peptide vials have failed sterility testing, so under what circumstances is it ok to inject and vial of peptide that shows indication of a compromised seal?

 

[Ghoul]

When are you going to do something else rather than post from your computer chair all day? Create hypotheticals instead of putting stuff into action?

Send/post some real stuff for testing or your own Raws you stocked up on.

You are nothing but a big joke.

Stop thinking like a drug dealer, conflating your tests that confirm the substance and potency, with harm reduction. You do that to ensure you don't have a beef with your customers.

The only "safety" involved with your testing is making sure one of your trailer park clients doesn't get pissed off and drop a dime to the cops, or pay a methed up midnight visit looking for a refund at the tip of a shotgun.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

It's "speculation" that vacuum serves a purpose and its absence is a problem?

It's hard to believe in a forum dedicated to "harm reduction" there are clowns giving vendors cover and putting out the message to members that using them without the assurance the seal hasn't been compromised is acceptable.

These morons, I presume, wouldn't consume a bottle of juice with the safety button popped up, but injecting something similarly compromised is fine?

Also

What have you done to ensure the safety of your own gear rather than piggy backing off of others on this forum.

You don't have any strong ideas.



It's a passive/aggressive thing he does quite a bit to me as well.

It's clear you've unhinged this drug dealer who wants to pass off sharing the mandatory QA he does on his stock, one dealer ensuring another isn't screwing him over, as some magnanimous act of "harm reduction", like some equivalent, or even superior to, the intense community focused harm reduction work you've done.

He showed his ass when he let slip he hates you because Scruff no longer posts test results. Think about why that would upset him. As a user unable to judge the quality of a vendor's product? No. Scruff's tests saved him money, padding his bottom line.

At this point he's boasting that he won't be "sharing" any more, purely out of spite, because you're allowed to exist here. Something he could do at no cost. That's actively choosing to induce unnecessary harm to the MESO community.

Shows you the depth of his commitment to MESO members.

You still havent made a comment about your idiot interpretation of me.

Where is your testing? you are piggy backing off of other peoples tests and not doing any yourself?

You are probably going to sit here in silence because you don't know how to respond fucking coward.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

Stop thinking like a drug dealer, conflating your tests that confirm the substance and potency, with harm reduction. You do that to ensure you don't have a beef with your customers.

The only "safety" involved with your testing is making sure one of your trailer park customers doesn't get pissed off and drop a dime to the cops, or pay a methed up midnight visit looking for a refund at the tip of a shotgun.

All I see is deadbeat loser posting from his computer chair all day.

You are pathetic.

 

[Ghoul]

All I see is deadbeat loser posting from his computer chair all day.

You are pathetic.

Go fuck yourself telling people it's ok to inject from peptides arriving unsealed.

You and your ignorance are a source of harm.

You don't need to, nor would it be any use, having Jano test it because the NEXT unsealed vial could be unsterile even if the one sent in is fine,

More than 1 in 20 peptide vials are testing positive for bacteria.

It's not like oils. There's no ingredient in peptides to inhibit bacteria growth.

 

[Sampei]

More than 1 in 20 peptide vials are testing positive for bacteria.

How do you know that?

 

[Ghoul]

How do you know that?

Jano reported it.

Just because *most* of the time a functioning immune system can handle the bacterial load doesn't mean that'll always be the case, depending on the individual and species of bacteria, which will be dependent on where the contamination occurred.

I proposed at least sterile filtering it before use, as a precaution, and even that offends the two "harm induction" idiots here.

 

[BamaCrazy]

The other purpose for vacuum is to maintain sterility.

A significant number of peptide vials have failed sterility testing, so under what circumstances is it ok to inject and vial of peptide that shows indication of a compromised seal?

Are you claiming lack of vacuum is a compromised seal? Or could it be just a lack of vacuum and nothing more? And if it is a compromised seal do you have real world examples of people here being harmed due to a compromised seal? Unlikely

Over the last 12+ months I’ve purchased several kits of various peptides. Some with vacuum. Some without. I’ve never been harmed. I am certain this is the case with many of the members here. Could the potency and effectiveness been impacted? Maybe. But linking everything to harm reduction to further your cause (whatever that cause is, you still haven’t told us) is getting old.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

Go fuck yourself telling people it's ok to inject from peptides arriving unsealed.

You and your ignorance are a source of harm.

You don't need to, nor would it be any use, having Jano test it because the NEXT unsealed vial could be unsterile even if the one sent in is fine,

More than 1 in 20 peptide vials are testing positive for bacteria.

It's not like oils. There's no ingredient in peptides to inhibit bacteria growth.

I was discussing degradation. but since you bring up sterility. Pretty sure vacuum helps maintain sterility but does not achieve it Could be wrong

more than 1/20 vials? Where are you getting this? post a quote

I proposed at least sterile filtering it before use, as a precaution, and even that offends the two "harm induction" idiots here.

Propose what?

Do some testing and take some initiative.

Why haven't you even talked about doing initiative of testing your own products?


You are avoiding the topic of YOU TAKING SOME REAL ACTION ON HARM REDUCTION.


BTW there is nothing wrong with people that live in a trailer park you twat.

Whats the real problem is someone who has dedicated his whole year to sitting his ass on these forums with no life outside of his computer chair. No practical application or real world experience into anything but what pubmed has posted.

 

[BamaCrazy]

Jano reported it.

Just because *most* of the time a functioning immune system can handle the bacterial load doesn't mean that'll always be the case, depending on the individual and species of bacteria, which will be dependent on where the contamination occurred.

I proposed at least sterile filtering it before use, as a precaution, and even that offends the two "harm induction" idiots here.

So 1 in 20? Are all peptides tested for bacteria? Or is it 1 in 20 of those from clients who paid for bacteria testing?

Honest question. I don’t know what’s included in basic testing.

 

[Ghoul]

Are you claiming lack of vacuum is a compromised seal? Or could it be just a lack of vacuum and nothing more? And if it is a compromised seal do you have real world examples of people here being harmed due to a compromised seal? Unlikely

Over the last 12+ months I’ve purchased several kits of various peptides. Some with vacuum. Some without. I’ve never been harmed. I am certain this is the case with many of the members here. Could the potency and effectiveness been impacted? Maybe. But linking everything to harm reduction to further your cause (whatever that cause is, you still haven’t told us) is getting old.

Who knows what caused the lack of vacuum? A slow leak, or a sudden leak in transit. The end user has no way of knowing,

Is this where we are now? You need direct evidence that someone's illness was caused by a contaminated vial or it's all nonsense?

At least sterile filtering it would eliminate that risk. It's standard lab practice with any lyophilized peptide that's going to be used in vivo. Lab rats are worthy of more precautions than members?

What's the purpose of vacuum sealing? Do you know? I'm serious. What do you think the purpose is, or would you advocate vendors just end that process?