CNraws, Private source for members only

short term money > long term money? weird choice

I suggest refunding, because who knows what you ingest with the remaining 75%. Deciding not to will only make people pick other vendors for raws.
 
Everyone says degredation, but even with time and bad storage, would it really go from 98/99% purity to 25% purity, or is it more likely that they are cutting to stretch it yet allowing it to still test positive.
 
Everyone says degredation, but even with time and bad storage, would it really go from 98/99% purity to 25% purity, or is it more likely that they are cutting to stretch it yet allowing it to still test positive.
In this case with yellow sticky raws it seems degredation but I see your point.
 
@Photon and others who ordered test U, please write to me if you want to refund or to take it as credit. It is up to you.

Sorry again for the low purity issue.
Yes I will take a refund for mine. Ideally if you do managed to get valid good test U. I'll take credit for another 150 grams exactly as paid before. But for now refund seems best for me. I will order again if you can confirm you have vaild test undeconate. Once this raws arrive I will test them anyways and give you another data point. I already suspect it will arrive the same batch as you said and will dispose of it after sending sample. Not sure what happened here but let's hope it doesn't happen again or very often
 
Yes I will take a refund for mine. Ideally if you do managed to get valid good test U. I'll take credit for another 150 grams exactly as paid before. But for now refund seems best for me. I will order again if you can confirm you have vaild test undeconate. Once this raws arrive I will test them anyways and give you another data point. I already suspect it will arrive the same batch as you said and will dispose of it after sending sample. Not sure what happened here but let's hope it doesn't happen again or very often
Not a problem. Write to me by email, please. To double confirm there.
 
Its been confirmed from same batch as yours for what its worth
Well send yours off for testing anyways when you get it. More data people have and the supplier the better. He did mention he covers testing and this will probably give him more leverage to show his supplier that they supplied him shit raws.
 
I can't imagine that being ever OK. Some manufacturer cutting corners?

This is what happens in a shortage.

It's not usually total unavailability.

Prices go up, quality goes down. There's less focus on quality when you're lucky to get anything at all.

Scams become increasingly frequent too.

It'll be interesting to see if the last few years turn out to have been the "golden age" underground AAS.

"Grandpa, tell me again about the $200 kits of Primo"
 
Last edited:
Back
Top