Cloudy/Lumpy HGH

[2lanes]

of the dozens of folks you mentioned who have experienced the same issue, did anyone send anything off to Jano for testing.

No, didn't want to waste any more money on this dogshit vendor. Their tirz was trash too

 

[AlexDavis43]

It's really clear following filtration. Provlem is that 90% of their customers aren't filtering. View attachment 328546

Send em a picture of that side by side with the cloudy one, or just post it and tag them. The direct comparison would be compelling. Seeing both images side by side at once, I mean. Like marketing.

 

[AlexDavis43]

No, didn't want to waste any more money on this dogshit vendor. Their tirz was trash too

Get reimbursed. Not wasting money.

 

[StoopidGoat]

Get reimbursed. Not wasting money.

As in, credit? No chance of using them again.

 

[Ateam2023]

Send em a picture of that side by side with the cloudy one, or just post it and tag them. The direct comparison would be compelling. Seeing both images side by side at once, I mean. Like marketing.

a side by side photo would really show the difference, it would be a good idea if that is an option,,

 

[Benf15harp]

I just added bac water to sigma 24iu hgh and after maybe 3 minutes all dissolved and perfectly clear.

 

[Smokeythabear]

I just added bac water to sigma 24iu hgh and after maybe 3 minutes all dissolved and perfectly clear.

My 24iu that I just received was the same thing (GB). However the 36iu I have from March, is cloudy (promo buy). Same vendor, both used 3ml of hospira Bac.

 

[Ateam2023]

As in, credit? No chance of using them again.

so was the problem mostly with the 36 iu vials? you said 24 iu and 36 iu were giving cloudy results, im wondering which specifically was the culprit in these filter tests you performed?

 

[2lanes]

so was the problem mostly with the 36 iu vials? you said 24 iu and 36 iu were giving cloudy results, im wondering which specifically was the culprit in these filter tests you performed?

10 iu

 

[StoopidGoat]

so was the problem mostly with the 36 iu vials? you said 24 iu and 36 iu were giving cloudy results, im wondering which specifically was the culprit in these filter tests you performed?

Mine are H36. As 2lanes posted above, it turns out his were 10 iu. I only became aware of this today. One individual in telegram mentioned the same issue with H24.

 

[Ateam2023]

Mine are H36. As 2lanes posted above, it turns out his were 10 iu. I only became aware of this today. One individual in telegram mentioned the same issue with H24.

ok i was confused about the 10 iu comment , thought he was talking smack , lol

 

[Ateam2023]

Mine are H36. As 2lanes posted above, it turns out his were 10 iu. I only became aware of this today. One individual in telegram mentioned the same issue with H24.

were these all from a "GB"?.

 

[CraneKraken]

Apologies, I just seen the reply. I hesitated because I was unsure of the forum policy on such behaviour.

The kits are from SSA, from speaking to others, it seems specific to the H24 and H36 kits. When queried, SSA state that their HGH should only be used with sterile water, and not bac water, which is obviously nonsense.

After 2 weeks of contacting them trying to get a viable explanation, many of us have given up, hence this post.

I've been saying for awhile now that their GH is rubbish. Had some dudes white knighting for them and trying to come at me for daring to claim the GH I purchased from SSA was subpar. I switched to Opti and have thrived using his GH. With that said, SSA does an excellent job with the other peptides I've ordered from them. For some reason the GH SSA offers just doesn't cut it.

 

[StoopidGoat]

were these all from a "GB"?.

Nope, never had contact with any of the people prior to my posting of the issue in the TG group. Some replied to my message after a few days (assumedly from searching the chat as its relatively fast moving). Others mentioned the issue after. All purchases that I'm aware of were individual.

 

[StoopidGoat]

I've been saying for awhile now that their GH is rubbish. Had some dudes white knighting for them and trying to come at me for daring to claim the GH I purchased from SSA was subpar. I switched to Opti and have thrived using his GH. With that said, SSA does an excellent job with the other peptides I've ordered from them. For some reason the GH SSA offers just doesn't cut it.

I agree 100%. Their other peptides are spot on. The problem is that outside of photos of these vials, it's anecdotal, with an equal amount of people saying theirs is fine, or its user error etc.

 

[CraneKraken]

Garbage GH plain and simple. Cue up all the nonsense excuses about the water it was mixed with blah blah blah. IMO there may be some decent generics out there, but if you have the cash if there's one thing you want to spend the extra money on and get pharm grade its GH. Then there is no guessing on what you have as far as quality is concerned.

Agreed, SSA GH is garbage and it has been for awhile. I do think that some sources on here have GH that is significantly better than it was in the past, and according to testing some are as close to, and even match, the same standards pharma is obligated to perform. The cost benefit analysis is a win for those UGL's that provide GH at 97 - 98% with no dimer. I'm pretty sure (could be off a % point) that's the same percentage pharma has to live up to.

 

[CraneKraken]

I agree 100%. Their other peptides are spot on. The problem is that outside of photos of these vials, it's anecdotal, with an equal amount of people saying theirs is fine, or its user error etc.

It's clearly not user error. You seem to know exactly what you're doing with the filtration process, so simply reconstituting it with BAC water being user error is a ridiculous assertion. I'd imagine the dudes making those claims are just coping because they have stockpile upon stockpile of dog shit GH and refuse to let it go.

 

[CraneKraken]

As in, credit? No chance of using them again.

If you use insulin just have them credit you with insulin pens. Those are pharma grade.

 

[Smokeythabear]

I agree 100%. Their other peptides are spot on. The problem is that outside of photos of these vials, it's anecdotal, with an equal amount of people saying theirs is fine, or its user error etc.

The frustrating part is all of the Jano tests I’ve seen for their GH is pretty damn good. I ordered the 24iu in a GB after buying that Feb/March promo of 36iu but before I tried the 36iu. I was stressing that my 24iu vials were gonna be cloudy shit too like my 36iu. Luckily these green top 24iu are clear so far. My SSA rep is acting as if she’ll replace the 36iu but I haven’t received tracking since we spoke on Wednesday. No matter what, I’ll be trying Lobster next. My JY grey top 24iu have been fine but I think it’s either under-dosed or degraded because my IGF-1 on 4iu was 293 but my IGF-1 on 3iu of the filtered 36iu from SSA was 306. Take that for what you will.

 

[keepbashing]

I think the problem with Jano-testing is, that peptides will be filtered before the testing process. Thats done in order to protect the HPLC. So whatever floats in your vials might not get detected by Janoshik testing. I might be wrong but @janoshik can tell us for sure. Not really my area of expertise.

Oh and i forgot to mention: I had the exact same issue with GH I ordered from HYB recently. Still in contact with the Rep. Will update you about the statement and solution.