Stubb
Member
Fucking chat gpt. Reliable as ever.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
TheScholarOfBrew - Trenbolone Acetate 100mg/ml 3rd party
- Thread starter Bobertson
- Start date
dinfar1337
New Member
yeah i have no idea what it is, it might be olive oil or whatever, but defiently isnt only that.
its some kind of weird blend
Spaceman Spiff
Subscriber
Either way, the guy isn't selling what he has advertised. Its not even mix-up.
It's a completely different oil and I am assuming it's intentional
dinfar1337
New Member
for all we know he grabbed the leftover kcf frying oil. always gotta have trust in your source. i absolutely dont trust this guy just hoping someone smarter than me can figure out what is precisely used
Why is he using 32% BB with PG for 100mg/ml Tren ace?
PG is definitely not part of MCT.
Is he trying to dissolve more low quality raws?
Post below are 2 GCMS of MCT oils from Devon and Axle.
One is higher dosed, thus higher BB%.
Looks...very different from what you have.
Devon
View attachment 335115
Axle
View attachment 335116
propylene glycol is a solvent, agreed that if this would show up it would not be mct but propylene glycol monoleate is a Emulsifier, stabilizer, completely diffrent in their use
Photon
Member
Does not matter, it should not show up.
PGmonoleate is an ester formed by the reaction of propylene glycol and oleic acid. You are however correct that PG is not the same as PGmono and has different use.
PGmono should not be in injectables. PG is used occasional, but it's not relevant for this product.
Do you think brewer was using it for these reasons ? It wouldnt take away the fact it is MCT but added PGmono for the reasons gpt gave
Photon
Member
Not MCT.
Not needed.
Already has very high benzoyl benzoate. Way too high for what is required.
Spaceman Spiff
Subscriber
To be fair, I don't really care about how much BB it has. I think it's bothersome that he's not selling what it is indicated. Some people have allergies to certain oil and to pull that shit is fucked up
why is it not MCT tho what factors are throwing the equation off, having PGM doesent mean its not MCT, some formulations/batches have this additive for specific purposes like improved emulsification or solubility.
Photon
Member
It is not MCT because the GCMS is showing a different oil.
It has nothing to do with PGM.
There is no relationship.
The GCMS shows a mix of different kinds of oils.
It shows a mix of animal/dairy fat with vegetable oil.
Maybe he fried something with vegetable oil and then used it for brewing.
I need some fried chicken.
Trenbolonetax
Member
A mix of animal and dairy fat? He did talk about a project / experiment of his involving using animal fat to hold higher concentrations of stuff… he never elaborated so I have no more details but it’s interesting given the presence of thoseIt is not MCT because the GCMS is showing a different oil.
It has nothing to do with PGM.
There is no relationship.
The GCMS shows a mix of different kinds of oils.
It shows a mix of animal/dairy fat with vegetable oil.
Maybe he fried something with vegetable oil and then used it for brewing.
I need some fried chicken.
Spaceman Spiff
Subscriber
Why do I think some new member here is the alt of the "Brewer"?
@janoshik
Can you please help clarify?
We have a bunch of clowns using ChatGPT and would appreciate your expertise.
Of interest in your report notes you indicate “common aas oil components” meaning this is not unusual and it is used by others.
What carrier oil(s) does this indicate? The advertised oil is mct blend(https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0...-8fbb-4e6a-98b4-4ca771256e8c.pdf?v=1745439497).
What do you think the presence of Propyleneglycol monoleate indicates or is associated with?
1 8.422 1647318 32.08 Benzyl Benzoate
2 9.697 137287 2.67 Pentadecanoic acid
3 10.813 967526 18.84 Linoelaidic acid
4 10.851 1191522 23.21 Oleic Acid
5 10.977 176006 3.43 Octadecanoic acid
6 11.465 77046 1.50 Isopropyl linoleate
7 11.500 69279 1.35 1,12-Bis(2-nitrophenoxy)dodecane
8 14.619 637983 12.43 Trenbolone Acetate
9 19.423 100311 1.95 Propyleneglycol monoleate
10 20.053 130034 2.53 1,1'-Bicyclohexyl, 4-methoxy-4'-propyl-
Can you please help clarify?
We have a bunch of clowns using ChatGPT and would appreciate your expertise.
Of interest in your report notes you indicate “common aas oil components” meaning this is not unusual and it is used by others.
What carrier oil(s) does this indicate? The advertised oil is mct blend(https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0...-8fbb-4e6a-98b4-4ca771256e8c.pdf?v=1745439497).
What do you think the presence of Propyleneglycol monoleate indicates or is associated with?
1 8.422 1647318 32.08 Benzyl Benzoate
2 9.697 137287 2.67 Pentadecanoic acid
3 10.813 967526 18.84 Linoelaidic acid
4 10.851 1191522 23.21 Oleic Acid
5 10.977 176006 3.43 Octadecanoic acid
6 11.465 77046 1.50 Isopropyl linoleate
7 11.500 69279 1.35 1,12-Bis(2-nitrophenoxy)dodecane
8 14.619 637983 12.43 Trenbolone Acetate
9 19.423 100311 1.95 Propyleneglycol monoleate
10 20.053 130034 2.53 1,1'-Bicyclohexyl, 4-methoxy-4'-propyl-
Last edited:
Thanks Tom. I’m just a guy who likes to help out new vendors. With current vendors doing things like charging ridiculous MOQs, the more competition in this constrained market, the better.
Sorry but for my first order, I’m not interested in dropping $500 until we have a mutual level of trust.
A
Anonymous member 154437
Guest
There’s some good ones with lesser minimums. I think people’s issue with this guy is they think he’s not ok in head and that he’s misrepresenting himself and the knowledge he claims to have. Not that he’s new and unknown or whatever. Just gotta prove yourself as a source, do testing, deliver on promises not join as a member then start promoting yourself out of nowhere
Photon
Member
I've nothing against him too, I'm just saying the GCMS does not look like the GCMS of the other local domestic vendor's MCT GCMS. It also does not list any of the oils mentioned in the PDF document you attached.
The Tren ace is fine, it shows up in the report. Its the MCT that's in question here.
That being said, there are some new local vendors with lower MoQs of $150/200. I hope they do well too.
Last edited:
Thanks. And that’s exactly what’s going on here with testing. I didn’t ask about the testing until I had the vials in hand. He agreed to reimburse which is something reputable vendors generally do. After that I did gcms which I do not see often, especially on tren ace of all things. I did some searching and only found one other report from over 10 years ago on gcms of tren ace and the link to the actual report was dead for me:
Jano did list this as common aas oil components. He called out no
EO even though I didn’t even ask specifically about EO. So if there was something out of place I think it would be noted. Hopefully he weighs in.
Carrier oils can't really be ID'd from GCMS alone.
Cheers
Cheers
Last edited:
heh, I knew it looked familiar - that's referring to my data from a decade ago
Might be interesting to have some input from the *experts* from back then.
God.
Similar threads
