MESO-Rx Sponsor Primal Pharma - US Domestic

First, I paid for products.

Then, I paid for testing.

There's money behind my standards.

You're just posting.
You finally got around to paying for HPLC testing? Way to go. Looking forward to what you find.

I have put plenty of money into standards. Thanks.
 
Do you have a thread somewhere that your test results are posted?

You can find the results from vendors who participated here:


Of note, it was shown by Jano that endotoxin testing on finished oils was not reliable for a range of matrices he encounters.
 
Last edited:
You finally got around to paying for HPLC testing? Way to go. Looking forward to what you find.

I have put plenty of money into standards. Thanks.
Not here.

If you're concerned about this specific source upholding community standards, or any source, test their products.

It's more efficient and effective than quoting and rephrasing your questions again and again.
 
Not here.

If you're concerned about this specific source upholding community standards, or any source, test their products.

It's more efficient and effective than quoting and rephrasing your questions again and again.
You may find my comments above geared toward expanding and defining the testing credit for this source.

When a source claims pharma grade, they will need to back it up. BS COA claims don't work either. Standard HPLC testing won't do that.

If you don't like my methods and don't want to see them, please ignore me (use the ignore feature). You have the ability and every right to do so. Many have tried but few seem to be able to do it long term based on my observations.
 
Last edited:
@readalot that’s how you do it like an adult.

Again, it’s good that you hold sources to a high standard. Most of us do.

The difference is, we manage that without leaving behind 20+ pages of obsessive pestering.

If the style of one’s (e.g. @readalot ’s) argument is embarrassing or unprofessional in the context of a debate/discussion, there’s the risk of pushing the audience to start feeling defensive about the entity one wants to convince to change behaviors, even if the audience agrees on the merits of one’s core argument and would be one’s natural allies.

That is not the optimal outcome one may be looking for. That’s the risk that is being pointed out, I’m just stating it formally. Simpler: one may lose allies who were already on the same side, based on the merits of one’s case, if they can’t stand the approach.

Debate is by its nature performative. Strategy can be as important as the merits of the case. Sometimes more so. The most effective leaders acknowledge this and work both angles.

Other factors, such as debate opponents’ style (e.g. Tracy, lol) as well as knowing one’s audience come into play, obviously. It’s not always about being the most formal/virtuous in approach.

This also applies to the vendor reps as well, but they do start with the upper hand by definition. Well…if their prices and delivery completion aren’t a shit show, and they aren’t disingenuous all the time.

I am impressed at the drive of several folks here, @readalot included, who spend their own free time pushing the vendors and participants towards safer solutions.

From time to time I cringe at some of what some harm reduction proponents write (and what defensive vendors write, obviously)…others might not, but I do, maybe that’s my personal problem. On balance, however, it’s good work. Thank you all for your commitment to harm reduction here and elsewhere.

TTA
 
Last edited:
If the style of one’s (e.g. @readalot ’s) argument is embarrassing or unprofessional in the context of a debate/discussion, there’s the risk of pushing the audience to start feeling defensive about the entity one wants to convince to change behaviors, even if the audience agrees on the merits of one’s core argument and would be one’s natural allies.

That is not the optimal outcome one may be looking for. That’s the risk that is being pointed out, I’m just stating it formally. Simpler: one may lose allies who were already on the same side, based on the merits of one’s case, if they can’t stand the approach.

Debate is by its nature performative. Strategy can be as important as the merits of the case. Sometimes more so. The most effective leaders acknowledge this and work both angles.

Other factors, such as debate opponents’ style (e.g. Tracy, lol) as well as knowing one’s audience come into play, obviously. It’s not always about being the most formal/virtuous in approach.

This also applies to the vendor reps as well, but they do start with the upper hand by definition. Well…if their prices and delivery completion aren’t a shit show, and they aren’t disingenuous all the time.

I am impressed at the drive of several folks here, @readalot included, who spend their own free time pushing the vendors and participants towards safer solutions.

From time to time I cringe at some of what some harm reduction proponents write (and what defensive vendors write, obviously)…others might not, but I do, maybe that’s my personal problem. On balance, however, it’s good work. Thank you all for your commitment to harm reduction here and elsewhere.

TTA
Which Alt account are you?? Hmmmm‍,
 
Keep the questions coming. We’re not ducking anything.
Yes you are.

- Raw purities
- Your claim of pharma grade
- All the stuff above you ducked (e.g., COA specs)


BiG DUCK:

 
Last edited:
Bro, now I get why you’re banned from certain forums... but anyway, just to clear the air on the testing situation: we’ve said it before and we’ll say it again. We encourage testing. Always have. And yes, we’ll happily reimburse anyone who takes the time and effort to test our products.

So you agree to terms above or you want to propose changes?
That’s not even a question. The only thing we ask is that it’s not abused or spammed just for the store credit. But as far as us being stingy? You want cash instead? I'll send that to you too.
You are slippery. I said XMR, not cash. Repeat, I didn't say cash.
We genuinely don't mind. That’s definitely not who we are. We’ve gone above and beyond for plenty of guys on here already, and we’ll keep doing so.

Please mark up terms found here with suggested changes...


If you want a ceiling on credit / reimbursement amount then please specify. Please be clear.
 
So you agree to terms above or you want to propose changes?

You are slippery. I said XMR, not cash. Repeat, I didn't say cash.


Please mark up terms found here with suggested changes...


If you want a ceiling on credit / reimbursement amount then please specify. Please be clear.
STFU !!!!!!

8000 posts in less than 2 years lol wow just wow
 
STFU !!!!!!
That approach works so well. You are persistent. Props.

mad foghorn leghorn GIF by Looney Tunes


You are building a quality body of work in here.

 
Last edited:
That approach works so well. You are persistent. Props.

mad foghorn leghorn GIF by Looney Tunes


You are building a quality body of work in here.

Unlike you idc what others think in here, how many private discords you been invited to because your well liked by many ?

Lol … I’ll wait …

Hey, there’s broke fatass basement dweller ghoul too !!!
 
Unlike you idc what others think in here, how many private discords you been invited to because your well liked by many ?

Lol … I’ll wait …
Seriously though. I don't walk in your shoes and i don't know what you got going on. IRL, I would be happy to buy you a beverage of your choice.

No joking, question: if I share something with you will you watch it and give me your opinion on it?
 
Back
Top