HammerBarn
New Member
Concerns Mount Over BBA Operations Following SSA Admin's Sudden Transition
(This message has been tidied up with assistance from chatgpt.)
In a move that has raised eyebrows within the community, AkumaRift — a former administrator of the SSA Telegram group — abruptly locked down the SSA chat and began directing members toward a new group affiliated with a company called BBA. The sudden transition occurred without clear explanation, prompting widespread skepticism among SSA members, many of whom reacted negatively to the announcement. These reactions reportedly led AkumaRift to delete and repost the message multiple times in an attempt to manage the backlash.
Since the formation of the BBA Telegram group, members have reported numerous red flags suggesting inconsistencies and potential misconduct:
Despite attempts to discuss these findings within the BBA Telegram group, users report that such messages are swiftly removed.
While it remains unclear whether BBA is engaging in deliberate fraud or is simply operating with poor transparency, the mounting evidence has led many in the community to suspect either selective scamming — fulfilling some orders to maintain credibility — or a full-scale exit scam in progress.
Readers are encouraged to review the evidence themselves and exercise caution. Those with additional information or firsthand experiences are urged to come forward and share further details.
(This message has been tidied up with assistance from chatgpt.)
In a move that has raised eyebrows within the community, AkumaRift — a former administrator of the SSA Telegram group — abruptly locked down the SSA chat and began directing members toward a new group affiliated with a company called BBA. The sudden transition occurred without clear explanation, prompting widespread skepticism among SSA members, many of whom reacted negatively to the announcement. These reactions reportedly led AkumaRift to delete and repost the message multiple times in an attempt to manage the backlash.
Since the formation of the BBA Telegram group, members have reported numerous red flags suggesting inconsistencies and potential misconduct:
- Inconsistent Information: Multiple conflicting price lists were circulated within the group, and initial claims stated that all products shipped exclusively from China. However, after a user claimed a U.S. package arrival within three days, the narrative shifted to include the existence of a U.S.-based warehouse.
- Admin Activity and Silence from Reps: AkumaRift’s unusually hands-on involvement in the day-to-day operations of BBA stood in contrast to his previously passive role as SSA admin. He, along with two other early members, were observed answering nearly all user questions while designated company representatives remained largely inactive.
- Bot Activity and Product Labeling Issues: Multiple users have raised concerns about suspiciously bot-like accounts claiming successful deliveries. In addition, inconsistencies have been observed in the labeling of peptides — with the same products arriving with different packaging for different individuals.
- Moderation Practices: Allegations of censorship have surfaced, with users claiming that posts highlighting inconsistencies or raising critical questions are promptly deleted. Accusations have also been made that AkumaRift deflects scrutiny and gaslights users when challenged.
- Lab Report Irregularities: Perhaps most notably, one user identified that six Certificates of Analysis (COAs) shared by BBA — purportedly verifying peptide quality — match exactly, in dosage and purity, to reports previously released by another company, OU Peptides. The reports appear identical aside from altered headers, leading to speculation that BBA may have repurposed OU’s lab results to falsely represent its own products. Both sets of COAs were obtained via the respective companies' Telegram channels and are available for independent comparison.
Despite attempts to discuss these findings within the BBA Telegram group, users report that such messages are swiftly removed.
While it remains unclear whether BBA is engaging in deliberate fraud or is simply operating with poor transparency, the mounting evidence has led many in the community to suspect either selective scamming — fulfilling some orders to maintain credibility — or a full-scale exit scam in progress.
Readers are encouraged to review the evidence themselves and exercise caution. Those with additional information or firsthand experiences are urged to come forward and share further details.

