MESO-Rx Sponsor Primal Pharma - US Domestic

[Mastedon]

That Mast P200 there is from the newest batch

Thanks for the insight. Would I be reimbursed if I did HPLC + GCMS testing on the old Mast P200 and NPP200, both from earlier this year?

 

[Primal_Pharma]

Thanks for the insight. Would I be reimbursed if I did HPLC + GCMS testing on the old Mast P200 and NPP200, both from earlier this year?

Of course brother!

 

[Tbaz192]

Alright boys I’m a year older today.

Where’s the good news on the gear results?

 

[Ryan Veneficus]

It's really strange, a 1ml sample is enough for multiple rounds of testing.

Janoshik Analytical

Unfortunately that forces me to consider that the original sample was tested, tested poorly, and so a new one had to be sent in to improve the result.

 

[Photon]

Unfortunately that forces me to consider that the original sample was tested, tested poorly, and so a new one had to be sent in to improve the result.

Maybe the lab used more oil, spilled it etc. Won't know for sure. I'm sure we can get people purchasing to test it either way so I won't sweat it..

 

[Primal_Pharma]

Unfortunately that forces me to consider that the original sample was tested, tested poorly, and so a new one had to be sent in to improve the result.

Tested poorly?

.

I challenge you to find a higher purity Mast P raw that is currently in stock from any other source. Will send you $500 XMR.

 

[Ryan Veneficus]

Tested poorly?

View attachment 354033. View attachment 354035

I challenge you to find a higher purity Mast P raw that is currently in stock from any other source. Will send you $500 XMR.

I was speaking about the test E 250 sample that was asked about in the original post that started this reply chain. Not Masteron.

 

[CHIEF M]

Tested poorly?

View attachment 354033. View attachment 354035

I challenge you to find a higher purity Mast P raw that is currently in stock from any other source. Will send you $500 XMR.

I only found same percentage lol shucks !

 

[Primal_Pharma]

I only found same percentage lol shucks !

 

[Photon]

Tested poorly?

View attachment 354033. View attachment 354035

I challenge you to find a higher purity Mast P raw that is currently in stock from any other source. Will send you $500 XMR.

You won't find anything above 98% because that's how it's reported by default. That's not the actual percentage. You can request for it to be reported in actual values instead. For e.g 98.10% vs 98%+.

Both 98.1 and 100% will be reported as 98%+.

 

[CHIEF M]

I was like I’ll take that xmr and spend it back in your shop lmao

 

[readalot]

You won't find anything above 98% because that's how it's reported by default. That's not the actual percentage. You can request for it to be reported in actual values instead. For e.g 98.10% vs 98%+.

 

[readalot]

For e.g 98.10% vs 98%+.

More like 99% +/- 1% TBF as an example. Although 100.2% +/- 2% would be another example.

Jano uses this "floor +" notation to avoid confusing some folks on the measurement plus / minus confidence interval. Or having to explain a perfectly reasonable measurement of 100.3% purity.

HPLC measurement error on raws is usually quoted as +/- 2% but I imagine on some raws it is tighter than that.

 

[Primal_Pharma]

You won't find anything above 98% because that's how it's reported by default. That's not the actual percentage. You can request for it to be reported in actual values instead. For e.g 98.10% vs 98%+.

Both 98.1 and 100% will be reported as 98%+.

They used to do 98-99% then, no?

 

[Photon]

They used to do 98-99% then, no?

Kain has TRA raws from QSC that's 98%+ but the actual purity was I think 100.3%.

My Test D raws are at 99.4% but also reported as 98%+.

Janoshik Analytical

I mean it doesn't mean much lol, I'm just saying it's how they report it.

 

[Turkeybuilder]

I must have missed some drama in this thread since i’m so new, why is everyone seemingly up this source’s ass when it comes to raws and oils despite clearly good results historically? Almost like some people are waiting/wanting this source to fuck up. I don’t see this on other sources threads

 

[readalot]

I must have missed some drama in this thread since i’m so new, why is everyone seemingly up this source’s ass when it comes to raws and oils despite clearly good results historically? Almost like some people are waiting/wanting this source to fuck up. I don’t see this on other sources threads

We are entering with a clear purpose: to set a higher standard and lead the way in performance supplementation. We are not here to follow trends. We are here to redefine them.

 

[readalot]

I must have missed some drama in this thread since i’m so new, why is everyone seemingly up this source’s ass when it comes to raws and oils despite clearly good results historically? Almost like some people are waiting/wanting this source to fuck up. I don’t see this on other sources threads

We don’t just aim to participate in this space—we intend to set the pace and become the benchmark by which others are measured.

 

[Photon]

I must have missed some drama in this thread since i’m so new, why is everyone seemingly up this source’s ass when it comes to raws and oils despite clearly good results historically? Almost like some people are waiting/wanting this source to fuck up. I don’t see this on other sources threads

People want to buy but are afraid of buying without test results.
They are worried it goes OOS so they keep pushing for testing.

 

[Turkeybuilder]

People want to buy but are afraid of buying without test results.
They are worried it goes OOS so they keep pushing for testing.

I personally also only buy lab tested oils as well. So I get why people push for testing. Idk it just feels like it’s more than just that in this thread sometimes but maybe that’s how things are on this forum compared to what i’m used to