MESO-Rx Sponsor Primal Pharma - US Domestic

I’m still a bit confused. Jano’s report said “contaminated BB sample.” Was that the benzyl benzoate (BB) you sent in? Can you clarify what that means in plain, layman’s terms?

I already mentioned multiple times.

I sent in
1 pc plastic from bottletop
1 vial pure BB
1 vial pure BB + plastic dissolved
2 sealed vials TRE400 (different batches)

Payment to see if the plastic is found in the TRE400.
 
Im just going to throw this out there, the added plastic to my cycle is giving me all the gains. 274lbs this morning lol
Understand You Get Me GIF by CBS


You're a tank, brother! Keep it up!
 
I already mentioned multiple times.

I sent in
1 pc plastic from bottletop
1 vial pure BB
1 vial pure BB + plastic dissolved

Payment to see if the plastic is found in the TRE400.
But it said the plastic was found in the 'contaminated BB' sample, no? That does not answer my question. @readalot can you explain in layman's terms?
 
I’ve said this a few times - I post updates to remind myself to send things in, and in this case I realized weeks later it hadn’t actually gone out that day. My apologies. But I post results the moment they land.

This is the last time I’m answering this. Results will be posted when they’re in. Simple! We’ve got a massive client base that trusts us and buys what’s in stock. If waiting on results isn’t for you, no hard feelings—we are more than happy to point you to another source with recent reports! Oh wait, that's if they have them...
I mean I have enough Test E from you to last multiple cycles and trt for years, honestly I should probably send in for my own testing if I plan to run this batch for years.

Is there any requirements I need to put on the jano test for it to be reimbursed? If I send a sealed vial and you’ll reimburse the vial and test cost via BTC?
 
Without a reference standard match, correct ion-ratio criteria, blanks, and an orthogonal confirmation, you can’t call it plastic. It could be column bleed, phthalate carryover from labware, or a solvent artifact. especially with dense oils like Tren 400.

I also want to say that i did read the points that you and @sionnach bought up. Interestingly you both joined at the exact same time and he's been extremely supportive of you immediately after joining.

Regardless, those points are indeed valid, but however are not possible to validate without extensive cost / funds and the involvement of a large lab and breaking OPSEC. I have zero interest in sending controlled substances to a large lab, revealing my ID to place a test order and paying via non-BTC options. Even more so, by the time all these testing is done, you'd probably be with a new batch of gear rendering the testing pointless...a wild goose chase.

Ultimately this is UGL and we have limited options. I also have zero interest in doing multiple rounds of testing for your gear. I'm here to buy and use gear, not go around testing it lol.

I however did each out to Jano to get details on reference samples etc but i doubt I'll be paying to get any of it and doing more testing.

On the plus side, we do have a few users who have sent in some of their HC gear, so we can wait for those results.

We're lacking SUS500 tho, if anyone has that, please do reply.
It's got the highest amount of solvents i believe.
 
Gotta be precise here. “Degraded plastic was found” is incorrect.

What the GC-MS screening showed was an unidentified peak that elutes where common plasticizers often show up. That’s not the same as confirming degraded plastic. Without a reference standard match, correct ion-ratio criteria, blanks, and an orthogonal confirmation, you can’t call it plastic. It could be column bleed, phthalate carryover from labware, or a solvent artifact. especially with dense oils like Tren 400.
Glad that got this type of response. Good on you primal
 
I mean I have enough Test E from you to last multiple cycles and trt for years, honestly I should probably send in for my own testing if I plan to run this batch for years.

Is there any requirements I need to put on the jano test for it to be reimbursed? If I send a sealed vial and you’ll reimburse the vial and test cost via BTC?
Will reimburse it all brother! SEND THAT BASTARD IN. I’ll even replace that vial for you <3
 
I mean I have enough Test E from you to last multiple cycles and trt for years, honestly I should probably send in for my own testing if I plan to run this batch for years.

Is there any requirements I need to put on the jano test for it to be reimbursed? If I send a sealed vial and you’ll reimburse the vial and test cost via BTC?

Request for HPLC+GCMS please.
 
I also want to say that i did read the points that you and @sionnach bought up. Interestingly you both joined at the exact same time and he's been extremely supportive of you immediately after joining.
Subtle bruh. I have no affiliation with any vendor on this site. I am a customer of several, including @Primal_Pharma . if you want a full list of the others so you can mention the questionability of my support on their threads, too, I can oblige.
 
I also want to say that i did read the points that you and @sionnach bought up. Interestingly you both joined at the exact same time and he's been extremely supportive of you immediately after joining.

Regardless, those points are indeed valid, but however are not possible to validate without extensive cost / funds and the involvement of a large lab and breaking OPSEC.
Brother, the same logic cuts both ways. If you’re saying our points aren’t “possible to validate” without breaking OPSEC and burning cash, then your claims aren’t verifiable either. That’s the whole point we’re making.

And no, don’t be weird. Come on @Photon you are so much better than that. There’s nothing between me and @sionnach. He’s calling it how he sees it, and that’s it. Unbiased perspective.

We reimburse legit third-party testing, no one has to dox themselves, and we’re not asking you to run “multiple rounds.” If you’re here to buy and not play lab tech, cool. Same here. Let’s just keep it accurate and fair. The leaps you made have some big gaps, brother.
 
Brother, the same logic cuts both ways. If you’re saying our points aren’t “possible to validate” without breaking OPSEC and burning cash, then your claims aren’t verifiable either. That’s the whole point we’re making.

All i said was that Jano provided written confirmation of plastic in 2 batches of TRE400. This is a fact. Saying it is not confirmed, isn't. That's all i was correcting. You may say that his claims are not valid or whatever, that's not my problem lol.

We reimburse legit third-party testing, no one has to dox themselves, and we’re not asking you to run “multiple rounds.”

Alot of the points bought up can only be done outside of UGL which will involve breaking opsec (probably need a larger lab).
 
Back
Top