MESO-Rx Sponsor Primal Pharma - US Domestic

OK Apes, quick update

We sent fresh samples to Jano for confirmation. Expect Primo, Sust, Tren Ace, and EQ to hit the site soon.

Initial lineup:
Sust 250 mg/mL in MCT
Tren Ace 100 mg/mL in MCT
Tren Ace Harm Reduction 75 mg/mL
EQ 300 mg/mL in MCT

Once more packs land, we’ll add GSO options.

Peptides went out as well, including our Tirzepatide, Retatrutide, and all TB-500 dosages.


Raw situation looks better than it has. Not spiking the football yet, but the trend is finally moving the right way.
Primo fuck yeah
 
Appreciate the bump. Saw the 153mg blind on a Mast P200 vial. That shouldn’t be that low. This one’s on us and we’re treating it as a true outlier we need to track down and fix. Our's came in at 200.27mg/mL.

Quick context on how a batch actually works. One vessel. We bring it to target, mix under heat, and hold at a controlled temp before fill. With short esters at high strength like Mast P200, the solution is thicker and less forgiving. If the agitation, temperature, or recirculation isn’t perfect at the moment of fill, you can get small pockets that read a little different. Two common culprits are short-term stratification during the hold or tiny crystals forming in a cooler zone that re-dissolve once the vial is warmed and rolled. Either can skew a single vial or a single draw.

Sampling and analytics matter too. Labs report mg per mL after converting from mass fraction using density and the ester correction. Small shifts in density assumptions, pulling from a vial that wasn’t fully warmed and rolled, or a less-than-ideal sample can move the number. Although I believe Jano does warm beforehand? @readalot would you know?

None of that excuses a 153mg/mL read when the target is 200, but it explains how a one-off low can show up even when the core batch is on spec. We also refunded @Mastedon in full + for his time, and are fully willing to replace that vial.
I have a few mast P200 vials.

Should I be concerned of under dosed mast ?
 
I have a few mast P200 vials.

Should I be concerned of under dosed mast ?
Do what @Photon said earlier in the thread take a little from each vial and send it off for testing and you’ll get an average of what your mix is if you’re super concerned and just mix the vials and revial them
 
Appreciate the bump. Saw the 153mg blind on a Mast P200 vial. That shouldn’t be that low. This one’s on us and we’re treating it as a true outlier we need to track down and fix. Our's came in at 200.27mg/mL.

Quick context on how a batch actually works. One vessel. We bring it to target, mix under heat, and hold at a controlled temp before fill. With short esters at high strength like Mast P200, the solution is thicker and less forgiving. If the agitation, temperature, or recirculation isn’t perfect at the moment of fill, you can get small pockets that read a little different. Two common culprits are short-term stratification during the hold or tiny crystals forming in a cooler zone that re-dissolve once the vial is warmed and rolled. Either can skew a single vial or a single draw.

Sampling and analytics matter too. Labs report mg per mL after converting from mass fraction using density and the ester correction. Small shifts in density assumptions, pulling from a vial that wasn’t fully warmed and rolled, or a less-than-ideal sample can move the number. Although I believe Jano does warm beforehand? @readalot would you know?

None of that excuses a 153mg/mL read when the target is 200, but it explains how a one-off low can show up even when the core batch is on spec. We also refunded @Mastedon in full + for his time, and are fully willing to replace that vial.
It’s been mentioned before, but blind testing always seems to be off 25-50% lol
 
Last edited:
Back
Top