Whistles77
Member
NPP100 and NPP200 P11 I think are untested too, unless I missed itBumping up for
P11 batch of 25% under-dosed MastP200.
Don't recall seeing this addressed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NPP100 and NPP200 P11 I think are untested too, unless I missed itBumping up for
P11 batch of 25% under-dosed MastP200.
Don't recall seeing this addressed.
Empty MCT oil is smooth, no?Awesome! Perfect pairing with your ment.
BTW, I’m on day 4 of the ment and so far so good- not trying to give a feels report or anything like that, but it pins very, very smooth.
Dude, just ask Jano. If we can wait forever for his test results, we can wait for his answers, too.@readalot would you know?
What makes you think it’s empty?Empty MCT oil is smooth, no?
I wouldn’t base the “strength” of a drug base don how much is hurts. Good gear brewed correctly and kept sterile flowsEmpty MCT oil is smooth, no?
Idk man. You made the initial comment about how it feels to inject it.What makes you think it’s empty?
Caps. I’ve gotten them before. Good stuff. Will dry you out!@Primal_Pharma Is the Accutane 20mg in Caps or Tabs?
Could be in junk mail or spam that’s where mine was locatedBeen off the forum for a few weeks working, is primal still sending out order verifications via email? Been watching for one but haven’t seen it.
Gotcha. Nah, I’m not suspicious of anything. Primal has done good by me since he opened.Idk man. You made the initial comment about how it feels to inject it.
Primo fuck yeahOK Apes, quick update
We sent fresh samples to Jano for confirmation. Expect Primo, Sust, Tren Ace, and EQ to hit the site soon.
Initial lineup:
Sust 250 mg/mL in MCT
Tren Ace 100 mg/mL in MCT
Tren Ace Harm Reduction 75 mg/mL
EQ 300 mg/mL in MCT
Once more packs land, we’ll add GSO options.
Peptides went out as well, including our Tirzepatide, Retatrutide, and all TB-500 dosages.
Raw situation looks better than it has. Not spiking the football yet, but the trend is finally moving the right way.
Honestly it is what it is. Even if we get a shit bag, we still finish the bundle, 'na mean?Gotcha. Nah, I’m not suspicious of anything. Primal has done good by me since he opened.
I have a few mast P200 vials.Appreciate the bump. Saw the 153mg blind on a Mast P200 vial. That shouldn’t be that low. This one’s on us and we’re treating it as a true outlier we need to track down and fix. Our's came in at 200.27mg/mL.
Quick context on how a batch actually works. One vessel. We bring it to target, mix under heat, and hold at a controlled temp before fill. With short esters at high strength like Mast P200, the solution is thicker and less forgiving. If the agitation, temperature, or recirculation isn’t perfect at the moment of fill, you can get small pockets that read a little different. Two common culprits are short-term stratification during the hold or tiny crystals forming in a cooler zone that re-dissolve once the vial is warmed and rolled. Either can skew a single vial or a single draw.
Sampling and analytics matter too. Labs report mg per mL after converting from mass fraction using density and the ester correction. Small shifts in density assumptions, pulling from a vial that wasn’t fully warmed and rolled, or a less-than-ideal sample can move the number. Although I believe Jano does warm beforehand? @readalot would you know?
None of that excuses a 153mg/mL read when the target is 200, but it explains how a one-off low can show up even when the core batch is on spec. We also refunded @Mastedon in full + for his time, and are fully willing to replace that vial.
Do what @Photon said earlier in the thread take a little from each vial and send it off for testing and you’ll get an average of what your mix is if you’re super concerned and just mix the vials and revial themI have a few mast P200 vials.
Should I be concerned of under dosed mast ?
Comcerning as I have about a case of Primal Mast P 200.
Can we identify the under dosed batch?
It’s been mentioned before, but blind testing always seems to be off 25-50% lolAppreciate the bump. Saw the 153mg blind on a Mast P200 vial. That shouldn’t be that low. This one’s on us and we’re treating it as a true outlier we need to track down and fix. Our's came in at 200.27mg/mL.
Quick context on how a batch actually works. One vessel. We bring it to target, mix under heat, and hold at a controlled temp before fill. With short esters at high strength like Mast P200, the solution is thicker and less forgiving. If the agitation, temperature, or recirculation isn’t perfect at the moment of fill, you can get small pockets that read a little different. Two common culprits are short-term stratification during the hold or tiny crystals forming in a cooler zone that re-dissolve once the vial is warmed and rolled. Either can skew a single vial or a single draw.
Sampling and analytics matter too. Labs report mg per mL after converting from mass fraction using density and the ester correction. Small shifts in density assumptions, pulling from a vial that wasn’t fully warmed and rolled, or a less-than-ideal sample can move the number. Although I believe Jano does warm beforehand? @readalot would you know?
None of that excuses a 153mg/mL read when the target is 200, but it explains how a one-off low can show up even when the core batch is on spec. We also refunded @Mastedon in full + for his time, and are fully willing to replace that vial.
Why are you guys asking questions a week later lol. Seems like you should be, yeah.I have a few mast P200 vials.
Should I be concerned of under dosed mast ?
How did my boy Bandern and DoubleDee catch a ban?
Yeah what’s happening lolIt was rampant and some more this morning. Don’t think it’s over yet.
